Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the proposition - “All animals are wild”?
Some animals are wild.
The given proposition is “All animals are wild.” This means that every animal falls into the category of being wild. Now, let's analyze each option to determine which inference can be validly drawn from this proposition:
-
No animals are wild. This option directly contradicts the original proposition. If all animals are wild, then it is not possible that no animals are wild. Therefore, this option is invalid.
-
Some animals are wild. This option can be inferred from the original proposition. If all animals are wild, then it naturally follows that at least some animals (if not all) are wild. Thus, this is a valid inference.
-
Some animals are not wild. Again, this option contradicts the proposition that all animals are wild. If it is true that all animals are wild, there cannot be any animals that are not wild. Therefore, this is an invalid inference.
-
No non-animals are wild. This proposition does not logically follow from the original statement because the original proposition only talks about animals, not non-animals. Without additional premises, we cannot conclude anything about non-animals based solely on the given proposition. Thus, this is an invalid inference.
Based on the analysis above, the only option that can validly be inferred from the proposition "All animals are wild" is "Some animals are wild." This inference is logically consistent with the original statement.
Similar Questions
Given below are two statements:
Statement I: No immediate inference can ever be drawn from only one premise.
Statement II: In Aristotelian syllogism, the conclusion is drawn from the first premise through the mediation of the second.
In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:The product of any three consecutive integers is divisible by 6. Therefore, 3×4×5 (=60), is divisible by 6? Which type of reasoning is embodied here?
A deductive argument is invalid if:
Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning:
In which of the following arguments 'the relation that exists between premises and conclusion is that of logical necessity'?
The argument which claims that its conclusion is conclusively supported by its premises is called
Which is an example of a correct deductive argument?
The argument which claims that its conclusion is supported by its premises conclusively is:
“The relation that exists between Premises and Conclusion is that of logical necessity” – is a case with which of the following arguments ?
In a valid deductive argument, if the premises are true, then:
Important Questions from Deductive
Given below are two statements:
Statement I: No immediate inference can ever be drawn from only one premise.
Statement II: In Aristotelian syllogism, the conclusion is drawn from the first premise through the mediation of the second.
In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:The product of any three consecutive integers is divisible by 6. Therefore, 3×4×5 (=60), is divisible by 6? Which type of reasoning is embodied here?
A deductive argument is invalid if:
Given below are some characteristics of reasoning. Select the code that states a characteristic which is not of deductive reasoning:
In which of the following arguments 'the relation that exists between premises and conclusion is that of logical necessity'?
