All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Which of the following techniques of enhancing strategic thinking is most similar to Devil’s Advocacy ?

This question was previously asked in
UGC NET 2025 Management Question Paper (07-Jan-2026) (Shift 1)
The correct answer is

Dialectical inquiry

 Dialectical inquiry — option 2. It belongs with devil’s advocacy because both are techniques for deliberately manufacturing conflict about a proposal.

The two conflict-based techniques.

 Devil’s advocacyDialectical inquiry
What is producedOne plan, plus a systematic critique of itTwo opposed plans — a thesis and a counter-plan or antithesis
Role assignedA member is appointed to attack the proposal, whatever he privately thinksTwo subgroups each build and defend a complete alternative
Outcome soughtA stronger version of the original plan, or its rejectionA synthesis drawing on both

They differ in degree, not in kind: one appoints a critic, the other builds a rival case. Both are forms of programmed conflict — conflict introduced on purpose rather than left to arise.

Why the other three are different in kind. All three are techniques for generating ideas and for suppressing the social pressures that inhibit them, not for attacking a proposal :

TechniqueHow it works
BrainstormingFree generation of ideas in a group with criticism deliberately withheld — the direct opposite of devil’s advocacy
Nominal group techniqueMembers write ideas silently and independently, then present and rank them in turn, so that no one dominates
Delphi methodExperts respond to successive rounds of questionnaires anonymously and without meeting, each round summarising the last, until answers converge

What the conflict techniques are for. They exist to counter groupthink — Irving Janis’s term for the tendency of cohesive groups to converge prematurely, suppress doubts and assume unanimity. A group that has developed an illusion of invulnerability will not criticise its own plan; the remedy is to assign the criticism as a duty, so that dissent carries no personal cost.

The cost of the method. Programmed conflict improves the quality of decisions but can reduce the group’s satisfaction and its willingness to accept the outcome — which is why the critic’s role is rotated and why the process is kept explicitly impersonal.

Hence, the answer is Dialectical inquiry.

Was this answer helpful?

Similar Questions

  1. In the context of Prisoner's dilemma, which one of the following is correct?

  2. In the context of distinguishing between forecasting and prediction, which one of the following statements is false ?

  3. A new approach “Learning Model” which is helpful to strengthen the decision making process was developed by :

  4. In the context of Prisoner’s dilemma, which one of the following is correct ?

  5. The decision-criterion in which a decision-maker selects an alternative that maximizes \(H\) (criterion of realism) \(= [a \times (\text{maximum in column})] + [(1 - a) \times (\text{minimum in column})]\) is called

  6. A phenomenon in which the norm for consensus overrides that realistic appraisal of alternative course of action is:


Important Questions from Decision Making

  1. Who pioneered the concept of "Fight or Flight situation" as stress survival trait ?
  2. An economic decision in the family deals with :

    (i) Multiple goals
    (ii) Single goal
    (iii) Multiple values
    (iv) Scarce resources

    code :
  3. Match List – I with List – II and indicate your answer by using the codes given below :
    List - I
    (Concept)
    List - II
    (Description)
    p. Heuristics1. Judgements made on the basis of specific kind of information that can be brought to mind.
    q. Representative Heuristics2. Tendency to use a number of value as a starting point to whom one adopts.
    r. Availability Heuristics3. Simple rules for drawing inferences in a rapid and effortless manner.
    s. Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristics4. Judgements made on the basis of resemblance of current stimuli to other stimuli.

    Codes:
  4. Arrange in correct sequence the steps involved in decision-making :
    I. Selecting the best alternative
    II. Identifying the problem
    III. Searching alternative solutions
    IV. Thinking through alternatives
    V. Feedback
  5. Arrange in proper sequence the steps involved in problem solving stage :
    (a) Obtaining relevant information
    (b) Selecting the best course
    (c) Formulating possible course of action
    (d) Identifying the problem
Need Expert Advice?
Upcoming Exams
CTET
December 12, 2026
CBSE UGC NET
December 14, 2026
CSIR UGC NET
December 19, 2026
Test Series
UGC NET img
Teaching
UGC NET (Paper 2) 2026 Mock Test Series
796 Tests 2 Tests Free
4.4(40)
English
More Questions from UGC NET

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App