Which of the following can alter the boundary of a state or change its name?
Parliament
The question asks which authority in India has the power to alter the boundary of a state or change its name. This is a fundamental aspect of the structure and organization of the Indian Union as defined by the Constitution of India.
Let's examine each option to determine which body holds this significant power:
The power to alter the boundary of a state or change its name is explicitly vested in the Parliament of India by the Constitution. Article 3 of the Indian Constitution deals with the formation of new States and alteration of areas, boundaries or names of existing States. It states that Parliament may by law:
A bill making any of these provisions can only be introduced in either House of Parliament on the recommendation of the President. Before recommending the bill, the President must refer it to the Legislature of the State concerned for expressing its views within a specified period. However, Parliament is not bound by the views of the State Legislature.
Based on the provisions of the Indian Constitution, specifically Article 3, it is clear that the power to alter the boundary of a state or change its name lies with the Parliament.
| Authority | Power regarding State Boundaries/Names | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| State government | No power to alter its own boundaries or name unilaterally. | ||
| Parliament | Has the constitutional power to alter boundaries, names, and form new states (Article 3). | ||
| Supreme Court | Interprets laws; no power to alter states. | High Court | Judicial function; no power to alter states. |
| Constitutional Power | Authority | Relevant Article |
|---|---|---|
| Form new states | Parliament | Article 3 |
| Increase state area | Parliament | Article 3 |
| Diminish state area | Parliament | Article 3 |
| Alter state boundaries | Parliament | Article 3 |
| Change state name | Parliament | Article 3 |
The process of altering state boundaries or names is a significant legislative act. While the President must refer the bill to the concerned state legislature for its views, Parliament is not obligated to accept or act upon these views. This highlights the central government's ultimate authority in maintaining the territorial integrity and political map of the Union of India. This power has been used multiple times in India's history to reorganize states based on language, administrative convenience, or other factors, for example, the formation of new states like Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand, and Jharkhand, or the reorganization of existing states.
The Parliament of India consists of ______.
Who among the following was the first Vice President of India?
In India the residuary powers to legislate any matter that is NOT mentioned in the three federal lists lies with the ______.
What is the minimum quorum required in the Lok Sabha so that it can transact any business?
In which of the following years was the Rajya Sabha first constituted?
Which of the following statements is NOT correct with reference to the election of the President of India?
Comptroller and Auditor General of India is appointed for how many years?
Whose resolution is mandatory to impeach the President of India from his office before the completion of his/her term?
________ scheme has been introduced by the Central Government to provide equal primary education to all budding children across India.
As of 26th January 2021, who is the Lok Sabha Speaker?
Who appoints the Chief Election Commissioner of India?
What is correct about the dismissal of Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha ?
i. He can be dismissed by no-confidence motion
ii. To introduce such resolution prior notice of 14 days is essential
iii. Such resolution should be passed by absolute majority
iv. Such resolution should be passed by a majority of the ten members of the house
What is correct ?
i. Finance Bill can be introduced in Lok Sabha only
ii. Rajya Sabha can detain the Finance Bill
If the Vice President removed from his office, what shall happened?
Consider the following statements :
1. In India, there is no law restricting the candidates from contesting in one Lok Sabha election from three constituencies.
2. In 1991 Lok Sabha Election, Shri Devi Lal contested from three Lok Sabha constituencies.
3. As per the- existing rules, if a candidate contests in one Lok Sabha election from many constituencies, his/her party should bear the cost of bye elections to the constituencies vacated by him/her in the event of him/her winning in all the constituencies.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?