The world currently has been in the throes of a twin process of 'democratic backsliding' and 'democratic backlash'. How would you explain this paradox?
The paradox of “democratic backsliding” and “democratic backlash” captures the contradictory forces shaping today’s political landscape. Democratic backsliding refers to the gradual erosion of democratic institutions, norms, and freedoms. It often manifests through weakening of checks and balances, judicial manipulation, suppression of dissent, curbs on press freedom, and constitutional changes concentrating power in executives. Populist leaders, elected through democratic means, frequently spearhead this trend by undermining democratic safeguards while claiming legitimacy from electoral victories. Such patterns are evident across diverse regions, from Central Europe to Asia and Latin America.
At the same time, however, societies have exhibited what scholars call “democratic backlash.” This represents citizen-driven resistance against authoritarian tendencies and democratic erosion. Protest movements, civil society activism, and mobilization by opposition groups reveal the resilience of democratic ideals even under threat. Mass demonstrations against corruption in Brazil, judicial overhauls in Poland, or electoral manipulation in Belarus illustrate how ordinary citizens remain deeply invested in democratic principles. Social media and global connectivity also amplify backlash, enabling citizens to coordinate resistance and demand accountability.
The paradox arises from these processes occurring simultaneously. Backsliding provokes backlash, as citizens and organizations resist attempts to erode their rights. Conversely, backlash can itself invite harsher measures from illiberal governments seeking to suppress dissent, thereby accelerating democratic decline. In polarized societies, this tension creates cycles of erosion and resistance, producing instability but also preventing authoritarian consolidation in some cases.
This dual dynamic underscores democracy’s contested yet enduring nature. While institutions may weaken, the normative appeal of democracy continues to mobilize resistance. The paradox reminds us that democracy is never static but constantly negotiated, defended, and redefined. Even amid decline, democratic ideals retain extraordinary resilience, reflecting their deep global legitimacy.
Answered By:
Discuss the psychological approach to the study of comparative politics.
Neo-liberalism lightened neo-realism's dark view of international politics. Comment.
Explain the non-traditional security threats in the context of food and environmental crises.
Discuss the political socialization of open and closed societies.
Comment on the Red Lipstick Movement in the context of feminist rights.
The withdrawal of the United States of America from the World Health Organization is set to have far-reaching impacts on global health. Reimagining the existing WHO is vital for the global health agenda. Discuss.
Transnational actors have qualitatively transformed the world by the way of their fresh insights and actions. Illustrate your answer with suitable examples.
Of late, centrist and centre-left political parties have been facing setbacks while centre-right parties have been in ascendency the world over. Comment.
Collective security and responsibility to protect (R2P) are similar but different in scope, goals and methods. Explain.
Global South-sensitive model of globalization would prevent the danger emanating from overcentralized globalization. Discuss.
How will you manage a case of misplaced copper-T (Cu-T)?
Describe the embryogenesis, clinical features and principles of management of cleft palate.
Write short notes in 150 words:
Metagenesis
Write short notes in 150 words:
Book lungs
Write short notes in 150 words:
Paedomorphosis