5, 9, 27, 31, 94, 97, 292
Sequence Pattern Analysis
The question asks to identify the incorrect combination in the number sequence: 5, 9, 27, 31, 94, 97, 292. We need to determine the underlying pattern governing the sequence.
Identifying the Pattern
Let's examine the relationship between consecutive numbers. A common approach for such sequences is to look for alternating arithmetic operations. Let's test the pattern: add 4, then multiply by 3.
- Start: The first number is 5.
- Operation 1: Add 4. $5 + 4 = 9$. This matches the second number in the sequence.
- Operation 2: Multiply by 3. $9 \times 3 = 27$. This matches the third number.
- Operation 3: Add 4. $27 + 4 = 31$. This matches the fourth number.
- Operation 4: Multiply by 3. $31 \times 3 = 93$. The sequence shows 94 instead of 93. This is the first point where the sequence deviates from the simple pattern.
- Operation 5: Add 4. If the previous number had been 93, then $93 + 4 = 97$. The sequence shows 97, which aligns correctly *if* we assume the sequence intended to reach 93 and then proceed.
- Operation 6: Multiply by 3. $97 \times 3 = 291$. The sequence shows 292 instead of 291. This is the second point of deviation.
Analyzing Deviations
Based on the identified add 4, multiply by 3 pattern, the expected sequence is: 5, 9, 27, 31, 93, 97, 291.
Comparing this to the given sequence (5, 9, 27, 31, 94, 97, 292), we find the following discrepancies:
- The number 94 appears where 93 is expected.
- The number 292 appears where 291 is expected.
Evaluating Options
The question asks for the incorrect combination. We assess the options based on these identified deviations:
- Option 1 (27, 292): 27 fits the pattern, but 292 deviates.
- Option 2 (97, 292): 97 fits the pattern (relative to the corrected 93). 292 deviates.
- Option 3 (31, 94): 31 fits the pattern. 94 is the first number that deviates from the pattern ($31 \times 3 \neq 94$).
- Option 4 (94, 292): This combination consists of both numbers that deviate from the simple add 4, multiply by 3 pattern. 94 deviates from the expected 93, and 292 deviates from the expected 291.
Conclusion
The combination (94, 292) is the incorrect one because both numbers represent deviations from the underlying add 4, multiply by 3 pattern. This pair highlights the primary errors within the sequence provided.
Similar Questions
Which number breaks the pattern?
3, 6, 11, 20, 33, 70
- What should come in place of the question mark '?' in the following number series?
$45, 40, 50, ?, 55, 30$ - Complete the series.
$25, 36, 49, 64, 81, ?$ - What should come at the place of question mark? : $98, 90, 82, 74, ?, 58$
- The series given below contains a sequence of numbers. Accordingly identify the incorrect combination. 4, 9, 12, 12, 36, 16, 108 , 18 , 323 , 21
- In the following question, select the missing number from the given series.
169, 196, 225, 256, ? - What is the next number in the series?
1, 3, 9, 27, ___ - Complete the series.
7, 14, 12, 24, 22, ? - What should come at the place of question mark? 1, 8, 27, 64, 125, ?, 343
- Find the WRONG number in the given series.
5040, 720, 120, 24, 4, 2
Important Questions from Number Series
What will come in place of question mark (?) in the following number series?
2, 5, 11, 23, 44, 77, ?
What will come in place of question mark (?) in the following number series?
31, 32, 36, ?, 61, 86
What will come in the place of question mark (?) in the following number series?
3, 6, 18, ?, 630, 6930
What should come in place of the question mark ‘?’ in the following number series?
60, 40, 50, ?, 180, 460
A series is given with one term wrong. Select that wrong term from the given alternatives.
J12, M24, P48, S96, U192
