The co-efficient of correlation is independent of:
both change of scale and change of origin.
The coefficient of correlation is a statistical measure that quantifies the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables, say X and Y. It is a value between -1 and +1.
A value near +1 indicates a strong positive linear relationship, a value near -1 indicates a strong negative linear relationship, and a value near 0 indicates a weak linear relationship or no linear relationship.
The question asks about the independence of the correlation coefficient from certain transformations applied to the data. Let's consider the effects of change of origin and change of scale.
Let's say we have two variables, X and Y. We apply a linear transformation to these variables to get new variables, U and V:
A combined transformation involves both:
where \(a, c\) are non-zero constants for change of scale and \(b, d\) are constants for change of origin.
The coefficient of correlation (Pearson's r) between two variables X and Y is calculated using the formula:
\(\rho_{XY} = \frac{Cov(X, Y)}{\sigma_X \sigma_Y} = \frac{E[(X - E[X])(Y - E[Y])]}{\sqrt{E[(X - E[X])^2]E[(Y - E[Y])^2]}}\)
or for a sample:
\(r_{XY} = \frac{\sum (X_i - \bar{X})(Y_i - \bar{Y})}{\sqrt{\sum (X_i - \bar{X})^2 \sum (Y_i - \bar{Y})^2}}\)
Let's see how the terms in the formula change for the transformed variables U and V.
The means of the transformed variables are:
Now consider the deviations from the mean for the transformed variables:
Notice that the change of origin constants (\(b\) and \(d\)) cancel out when we look at the deviations from the mean. This means adding a constant to a variable does not change the differences between data points or their differences from the mean. Therefore, change of origin does not affect the correlation coefficient.
The change of scale constants (\(a\) and \(c\)) appear as multiplicative factors in the deviations.
Let's substitute these into the correlation formula for \(r_{UV}\):
\(r_{UV} = \frac{\sum (U_i - \bar{U})(V_i - \bar{V})}{\sqrt{\sum (U_i - \bar{U})^2 \sum (V_i - \bar{V})^2}}\)
\(r_{UV} = \frac{\sum [a(X_i - \bar{X})][c(Y_i - \bar{Y})]}{\sqrt{\sum [a(X_i - \bar{X})]^2 \sum [c(Y_i - \bar{Y})]^2}}\)
\(r_{UV} = \frac{\sum ac(X_i - \bar{X})(Y_i - \bar{Y})}{\sqrt{\sum a^2 (X_i - \bar{X})^2 \sum c^2 (Y_i - \bar{Y})^2}}\)
\(r_{UV} = \frac{ac \sum (X_i - \bar{X})(Y_i - \bar{Y})}{\sqrt{a^2 \sum (X_i - \bar{X})^2 \cdot c^2 \sum (Y_i - \bar{Y})^2}}\)
\(r_{UV} = \frac{ac \sum (X_i - \bar{X})(Y_i - \bar{Y})}{\sqrt{a^2 c^2 \sum (X_i - \bar{X})^2 \sum (Y_i - \bar{Y})^2}}\)
\(r_{UV} = \frac{ac \sum (X_i - \bar{X})(Y_i - \bar{Y})}{|ac| \sqrt{\sum (X_i - \bar{X})^2 \sum (Y_i - \bar{Y})^2}}\)
We can see that the term \(\frac{\sum (X_i - \bar{X})(Y_i - \bar{Y})}{\sqrt{\sum (X_i - \bar{X})^2 \sum (Y_i - \bar{Y})^2}}\) is simply \(r_{XY}\).
So, \(r_{UV} = \frac{ac}{|ac|} r_{XY}\).
While a change in scale using negative multipliers on only one variable can flip the sign of the correlation, the magnitude remains the same. The essential property is that the linear relationship's strength is preserved, and the structure of the correlation coefficient formula is designed to be independent of the scale and origin of the variables.
In standard contexts, when discussing independence from change of scale and origin, it refers to the core measure being robust to these linear transformations. The property holds true for both transformations.
Based on the mathematical derivation, the coefficient of correlation is independent of both change of scale and change of origin. Adding or subtracting constants (change of origin) shifts the data but doesn't change the scatter pattern or the relative distance between points. Multiplying or dividing by positive constants (change of scale) stretches or shrinks the scatter plot uniformly, but the shape and thus the correlation remain the same. If negative constants are used for scaling, the direction (sign) might flip, but the strength (magnitude) of the correlation stays independent.
Therefore, the correct statement is that the coefficient of correlation is independent of both change of scale and change of origin.
| Transformation Type | Effect on Data | Effect on Correlation Coefficient |
|---|---|---|
| Change of Origin (\(X \to X+b\)) | Shifts data points | No change (\(r_{X+b, Y} = r_{XY}\)) |
| Change of Scale (\(X \to aX\)) | Stretches/Compresses data points | Sign may flip if \(a < 0\), but magnitude unchanged (\(r_{aX, Y} = \frac{a}{|a|} r_{XY}\)) |
| Both (\(X \to aX+b, Y \to cY+d\)) | Shifts and Scales data points | Sign may flip if \(a\) and \(c\) have different signs, but magnitude unchanged (\(r_{aX+b, cY+d} = \frac{ac}{|ac|} r_{XY}\)) |
Let's quickly review the properties of correlation coefficient and other statistics under transformations.
| Statistic | Change of Origin (\(X \to X+b\)) | Change of Scale (\(X \to aX\)) |
|---|---|---|
| Mean (\(\bar{X}\)) | \(\bar{X} + b\) | \(a\bar{X}\) |
| Variance (\(s^2\)) | \(s^2\) (Independent) | \(a^2 s^2\) |
| Standard Deviation (\(s\)) | \(s\) (Independent) | \(|a|s\) |
| Correlation Coefficient (\(r_{XY}\)) | \(r_{XY}\) (Independent) | \(\frac{ac}{|ac|} r_{XY}\) (Independent of magnitude, sign may flip) |
Understanding how statistical measures behave under linear transformations is crucial in data analysis. The independence of the correlation coefficient from changes of scale and origin is a powerful property. It means that the strength and direction of the linear association between two variables do not depend on the units of measurement used or where the zero point is set. For example, the correlation between height in inches and weight in pounds will be the same as the correlation between height in centimeters and weight in kilograms.
This property is why standardizing variables (transforming them to have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1, which involves both change of origin and scale) does not change their correlation.
While the Pearson correlation coefficient is independent of linear transformations, it is important to remember that it only measures the linear relationship. Non-linear relationships are not fully captured by this coefficient, and transformations might be needed to linearize data before computing Pearson's r effectively.
If two lines of regression are x + 4y + 1 = 0 and 4x + 9y + 7 = 0, then what is the value of x when y = -3 ?
A bivariate data set contains only two points (-1, 1) and (3, 2). What will be the line of regression of y on x ?
The coefficient of correlation between ages of husband and wife at the time of marriage for a given set of 100 couples was noted to be 0.7. Assume that all these couples survive to celebrate the silver jubilee of their marriage. The coefficient of correlation at that point of time will be
Consider the following statements:
1. The coefficient of correlations r is \(\rm \frac{3}{4}\) .
2. The means of x and y are 3 and 4 respectively.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Consider the following statements:
1. The regression line of y on x is \(\rm y = \frac{3}{4}x+2\)
2. The regression line of x on y is \(\rm x = \frac{3}{4}y+\frac{1}{4}\)
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
If two variables X and Y are independent, then what is the correlation coefficient between them?
In which one of the following cases would you expect to get a negative correlation?
If the regression coefficient of Y on X is -6, and the correlation coefficient between X and Y is \( - \frac{1}{2},\) then the regression coefficient of X on Y would be
The set of bivariate observation (x 1, y 1) (x 2y 2) …., (x n, y n) are such that all the values are distinct and all the observations fall on a straight line with non-zero slope. Then the possible value of the correlation coefficient between x and y are
The correlation coefficient computed form a set of 30 observations is 0.8 then the percentage of variation not explained by linear regression is
Variable Y regresses with variable X with the conditions that \(\overline X = 5.50\) , \(\overline Y = 3.50\) and b = 1.50 in the linear regression model (Y = a + bX), where \(\overline Y\) and \(\overline X\) are means of the respective variables and b refers to gradient of line of Y w. r. t X. Which one of the following values of parameter 'a' of the model is correct?
Given below are two statements:
Statement l: One of the assumptions under OLS method states that the regression model is linear in the parameters, though it may or may not be linear in the variables.
Statement ll: The variance of the error, or disturbance, term is not the same regardless of the value of the explanatory variable under OLS.
In light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below
If two regression coefficients are -0.8 and -0.2, then the value of coefficient of correlation is
Which of the following statements relating to Correlation and Regression are true?
(a) The Coefficient of Correlation is independent of change of origin and scale.
(b) The Coefficient of Correlation between the two variables is the arithmetic average of the two Regression Coefficients.
(c) The probable error of the Coefficient Correlation is 0.6745 times its standard error.
(d) Coefficient of Correlation multiplied by the ratio between the standard deviations of the two variables denotes the slope of the regression line.
Code:
If two regression coefficients are 0.8 and 1.2, which one of the following is the value of coefficient of correlation?