Select the option that is related to the third number in the same way as the second number is related to the first number and the sixth numbers is related to the fifth number.
85
Number analogy questions test your ability to find the relationship or pattern between pairs of numbers. The same relationship must hold true for all given pairs in the analogy. In this specific problem, we are given three parts: 52 is to 221, 20 is to an unknown number, and 64 is to 272. We need to find the relationship between the first and second numbers (52 and 221) and the fifth and sixth numbers (64 and 272), and then apply that relationship to the third number (20) to find the fourth, or missing, number.
Let's look closely at the given pairs:
We need to find a consistent mathematical operation or relationship that transforms the first number of each pair into the second number.
Let's try division to see if there's a simple ratio:
For the first pair (52 and 221):
\( \frac{221}{52} \)
Let's perform the division:
\( 221 \div 52 \approx 4.25 \)
Let's check if 52 multiplied by 4.25 gives 221:
\( 52 \times 4.25 = 52 \times \frac{17}{4} = \frac{52}{4} \times 17 = 13 \times 17 = 221 \)
This works! The relationship for the first pair seems to be multiplying the first number by 4.25 (or \(\frac{17}{4}\)).
Now let's check this relationship for the third pair (64 and 272):
Is \( 64 \times 4.25 \) equal to 272?
\( 64 \times 4.25 = 64 \times \frac{17}{4} = \frac{64}{4} \times 17 = 16 \times 17 = 272 \)
Yes, the relationship holds true for the third pair as well. The consistent pattern is to multiply the first number by 4.25 (or \(\frac{17}{4}\)) to get the second number.
Now we need to apply this same pattern to the third number in the analogy, which is 20, to find the missing fourth number.
The relationship is: Missing Number = \( 20 \times 4.25 \)
Let's calculate:
\( 20 \times 4.25 = 20 \times \frac{17}{4} \)
We can simplify this calculation:
\( \frac{20}{4} \times 17 = 5 \times 17 = 85 \)
So, the missing number is 85.
The analogy can be completed as: 52 : 221 :: 20 : 85 :: 64 : 272
This fits the pattern we discovered where the second number is obtained by multiplying the first number by 4.25.
Let's check the given options:
Our calculated missing number, 85, matches one of the options.
| First Number | Relationship | Second Number |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | \(\times 4.25\) (or \(\times \frac{17}{4}\)) | 221 |
| 20 | \(\times 4.25\) (or \(\times \frac{17}{4}\)) | 85 |
| 64 | \(\times 4.25\) (or \(\times \frac{17}{4}\)) | 272 |
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Number Analogy | A type of logical reasoning question where numbers are related based on a specific pattern or rule. |
| Pattern Recognition | The process of identifying the rule or relationship connecting the numbers in the known pairs. |
| Applying the Rule | Using the identified pattern to find the missing number in the incomplete pair. |
Number analogy problems can use various types of patterns. Here are some common ones:
Practicing different types of patterns helps improve your ability to quickly identify the rule in number analogy questions.
Select the option in which the numbers are related in the same way as are the numbers of the following set.
(4, 8, 16)
Select the option that is related to the third number in the same way as the second number is related to the first number.
23 : 441 : : 28 : ?
Select the option that is related to the third number in the same way as the second number is related to the first number and the sixth number is related to the fifth number.
12 : 72 ∷ 18 : ? ∷22 : 242Select the option that is related to the third number in the same way as the second number is related to the first number.
7 : 56 :: 11 : ?
Select the option in which the numbers are related in the same way as are the numbers of the following set.
(12, 60, 84)