Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All polygons are angles. All angles are diagonals. All cones are cubes. All cubes are decagons. No diagonal is a cube. Conclusions: I. Some diagonals are polygons. II. All diagonals are decagons. III. No polygon is a cone. IV. Some cubes are angles.
Both conclusions I and III follow
Understanding the Statements and Conclusions Logic
This question requires us to analyze a set of statements and determine which of the given conclusions logically follow from them, assuming the statements are true.
Analyzing the Given Statements
Let's break down the statements provided:
- Statement 1: All polygons are angles. (Polygon → Angle)
- Statement 2: All angles are diagonals. (Angle → Diagonal)
- Statement 3: All cones are cubes. (Cone → Cube)
- Statement 4: All cubes are decagons. (Cube → Decagon)
- Statement 5: No diagonal is a cube. (Diagonal ↔ No Cube)
Combining Statements for Logical Deduction
We can combine some statements to find indirect relationships:
- From Statement 1 and 2: All polygons are angles, and all angles are diagonals. This means All polygons are diagonals. (Polygon → Angle → Diagonal)
- From Statement 3 and 4: All cones are cubes, and all cubes are decagons. This means All cones are decagons. (Cone → Cube → Decagon)
- Now consider Statement 5: No diagonal is a cube.
- Since All polygons are diagonals and No diagonal is a cube, it follows that No polygon is a cube.
- Since All cones are cubes and No diagonal is a cube, it follows that No cone is a diagonal.
- Since All cubes are decagons and No diagonal is a cube, it implies the set of diagonals and the set of cubes (and thus decagons related through cubes) are separate.
Evaluating the Conclusions
Let's examine each conclusion based on the deductions from the statements:
- Conclusion I: Some diagonals are polygons.
We deduced that All polygons are diagonals. If all of entity A are entity B, then it is logically true that some of entity B are entity A. Therefore, if All polygons are diagonals, then Some diagonals are polygons. This conclusion follows.
- Conclusion II: All diagonals are decagons.
We know that No diagonal is a cube and All cubes are decagons. This establishes a separation between diagonals and the set of cubes/decagons. There is no information suggesting that all diagonals must also be decagons. This conclusion does not follow.
- Conclusion III: No polygon is a cone.
We established that All polygons are diagonals and No diagonal is a cube. This implies No polygon is a cube. We are also given that All cones are cubes. If no polygon is a cube, and all cones are cubes, then certainly no polygon can be a cone. This conclusion follows.
- Conclusion IV: Some cubes are angles.
We know that All angles are diagonals and No diagonal is a cube. This means that the set of angles and the set of cubes are disjoint (they have no elements in common). Therefore, it is impossible for some cubes to be angles. This conclusion does not follow.
Summary of Conclusions
Based on our analysis:
- Conclusion I: Some diagonals are polygons. (Follows)
- Conclusion II: All diagonals are decagons. (Does not follow)
- Conclusion III: No polygon is a cone. (Follows)
- Conclusion IV: Some cubes are angles. (Does not follow)
Therefore, both conclusions I and III follow from the given statements.
Revision Table: Statements and Inferences
| Statements | Inference |
|---|---|
| All Polygons are Angles | Polygon → Angle |
| All Angles are Diagonals | Angle → Diagonal |
| All Polygons are Angles, All Angles are Diagonals | ⇒ All Polygons are Diagonals (Polygon → Diagonal) |
| All Cones are Cubes | Cone → Cube |
| All Cubes are Decagons | Cube → Decagon |
| All Cones are Cubes, All Cubes are Decagons | ⇒ All Cones are Decagons (Cone → Decagon) |
| No Diagonal is a Cube | Diagonal ↔ No Cube (Mutually exclusive sets) |
| All Polygons are Diagonals, No Diagonal is a Cube | ⇒ No Polygon is a Cube |
| All Cones are Cubes, No Diagonal is a Cube | ⇒ No Cone is a Diagonal |
| All Angles are Diagonals, No Diagonal is a Cube | ⇒ No Angle is a Cube |
Additional Information: Syllogism Rules
This question is based on principles of logical syllogisms, a form of deductive reasoning. Here are some basic rules applied here:
- All A are B: This means the set of A is a subset of the set of B. From this, it logically follows that Some B are A. It does *not* mean All B are A.
- No A is B: This means the set of A and the set of B are disjoint (they have no elements in common). From this, it logically follows that No B is A.
- Transitivity (Chain Rule): If All A are B and All B are C, then it logically follows that All A are C. (A → B → C ⇒ A → C)
- Negative Chain Rule: If All A are B and No B is C, then it logically follows that No A is C. (A → B, B ↔ No C ⇒ A ↔ No C) Similarly, if No A is B and All B are C, it does not necessarily mean No A is C (A could overlap with C if B is a subset of C). However, if All B are C and No A is B, you cannot say anything definitive about the relationship between A and C without more information. In this problem, we used the rule: All A are B, and No B is C ⇒ No A is C (e.g., Polygons are Diagonals, No Diagonal is Cube ⇒ No Polygon is Cube).
Applying these fundamental rules helps in correctly evaluating whether a conclusion logically follows from the given statements.
Similar Questions
Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement:
All games are entertainment.
All entertainment is fun.
Conclusions:
I. All games are fun
II. Some fun is entertainment.
Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement:
All engineers are skilled. No unskilled person is allowed.
Conclusions:
I. All engineers are allowed.
II. No skilled person is unskilled.
Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement:
All boxes are bags. Some bags are blue. No blue is a plastic.
Conclusions:
I. Some boxes are not plastic.
II. All plastics are bags.
Three statements are given, followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some desks are trays.
Some trays are plates.
Some plates are desks.
Conclusions:
I. All desks are plates.
II. All plates are desks.
III. Some plates are trays.
IV. All trays are desks.
Three statements are given, followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some coolers are mixers.
Some mixers are scissors.
Some scissors are knives.
Conclusions:
I. Some knives are mixers.
II. Some scissors are coolers.
III. Some knives are coolers.
IV. No knife is a mixer.
Three statements are given followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All rice are grains.
All pulses are grains.
All grains are edibles.
Conclusions:
I. All rice are edibles.
II. All pulses are edible.
III. Some edibles are grains.
In this question, three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements.
Statements:
All balls are flowers.
All flowers are plates.
Some plates are cups.
Conclusions:
I. Some flowers are balls.
II. Some plates are flowers.
III. All cups are plates.
Three statements are given followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and Ill. Question ID: 264330143712 Status : Answered Chosen Option : 1 Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All males are boys.
Some teachers are boys.
All students are teachers.
Conclusions:
I. Some boys are males.
II. Some teachers are students.
Ill. All males are students.
Three Statements are given followed by Three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All curtains are doormats.
Some doormats are pillows.
Some pillows are bedsheets.
Conclusions:
I. Some bedsheets are doormats.
II. Some bedsheets are curtains.
III. Some pillows are doormats.
Three Statements are given followed by Three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some sweets are chocolates.
All chocolates are cookies.
Some cookies are healthy.
Conclusions:
I. Some sweets are cookies.
II. Some cookies are chocolates.
III. Some chocolates are sweets.
Important Questions from Conventional Syllogism
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
1. Some flowers are chemicals.
2. Some chemicals are herbs.
Conclusions:
I. No flower is a herb.
II. Some flowers are herbs.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All students are teachers.
All teachers are professors.
Conclusions:
1. All students are professors.
2. All professors are students.
3. No teacher is a professor.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
I. Some dentists are surgeons.
II. All the surgeons are doctors.
Conclusions:
I. Some dentists are doctors.
II. No surgeons are dentists.
The statements below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Assuming that the information in the statements is true, even if it appears at variance with generally established facts. decide which conclusion(s) logically and definitely follow(s) from the information given in the statements.
Statements:
1) Some angers are griefs.
2) Some griefs are loves.
Conclusion:
I. Some griefs are angers.
II. Some loves are griefsThe statements below are followed by two conclusions labeled I and II. Assuming that the information in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with generally established facts. decide which conclusion(s) logically and definitely follow(s) from the information given in the statements.
Statements:
Some cows are deer.
Some deer are fishes.
Conclusion:
I. Some cows are fishes.
II. Some fishes are cows.
