Statement: In an attempt to modernize agricultural output, the government has introduced AI-based crop surveillance tools in rural zones with high farmer suicide rates.
Judgements:
1. Traditional agricultural surveillances are entirely ineffective.
2. Technological interventions may indirectly improve farmer well-being.
The question asks to identify which judgements logically follow from the provided statement about implementing AI-based crop surveillance.
Judgement Analysis
The statement is: "In an attempt to modernize agricultural output, the government has introduced AI-based crop surveillance tools in rural zones with high farmer suicide rates."
Analysis of Judgement 1: Traditional agricultural surveillances are entirely ineffective.
- The statement indicates the introduction of new AI tools to modernize agriculture.
- It does not provide any information about the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of traditional methods.
- Introducing new technology does not automatically mean older methods have completely failed.
- Therefore, the judgement that traditional methods are entirely ineffective does not necessarily follow from the statement.
Analysis of Judgement 2: Technological interventions may indirectly improve farmer well-being.
- The AI tools are introduced in areas with high farmer suicide rates, suggesting underlying issues with farmer well-being.
- The stated goal is to modernize agricultural output.
- Improved agricultural output can potentially lead to better economic conditions for farmers.
- Better economic stability can indirectly reduce stress and improve overall well-being, potentially lowering suicide rates.
- The judgement uses the word "may," indicating a possibility rather than a certainty, which aligns with the potential indirect effects of technological interventions.
- Therefore, the judgement that technological interventions may indirectly improve farmer well-being logically follows as a potential outcome.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis, only Judgement 2 is a valid conclusion that can be drawn from the statement.
Correct Option: Only judgement 2 follows
Similar Questions
- Read the following statement carefully and identify the assumption that follows.
Statement:
A school circular states: "Mobile phones are not allowed inside classrooms."
Assumptions:
I. Phones distract students.
II. Students often bring phones to class.
Important Questions from Statements and Assumptions
Direction: A statement is given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming that the given statement is true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.
Statement:
In a football match between Team-X and Team-Y, the total number of goals scored by Team-Y was 5, out of which 3 goals were scored by the left footed player.
Assumption:
I. The left-footed player was adept at scoring goals.
II. 60% of the players in Team Y are left footed.
Consider the given statement and decide which of the given assumptions is implicit in the statement.
statement:
P advised Q, "Go to Mumbai via Jaipur ____ the shortest route"
Assumptions: I. P advises everybody.
II. Q wishes to go to Mumbai.
Read the given statement and assumptions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statement is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given assumptions logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
During exams, invigilators are not supposed to use mobile phones in the examination hall.
Assumptions:
I. Mobile disturbs students during examination.
II. Keeping mobiles switched off helps to improve their vigilance.
Consider the given statements and decide which of the given assumptions is/are implicit in the statement.
Statement:
To expand their business, a budding company now requires more staff.
Assumptions:
I: The current staff is incompetent.
II: Business can only be expanded by always hiring new staff.
Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement.
Statement:
"SAVE MONEY - BUY 1 GET 3" — Advertisement by a commercial brand.
Assumptions:
1. Brand sales increased profusely after the offer.
2. People are more attracted to buy if they are offered more than what they are already paying.
