Consider the given question and decode which of the following statements is sufficient to answer the question. Who among P, Q, R, S and T is lightest in weight? Statements: 1. Q weight < P and S also S weight > T 2. R weight > Q but < T
Both statement 1 and 2 are sufficient.
The question asks us to determine who among five people (P, Q, R, S, and T) is the lightest, based on information provided in two statements. We need to figure out if one statement alone, or both statements together, are sufficient to answer this question.
Statement 1 says: "Q weight < P and S also S weight > T".
Let's break this down into individual inequalities:
Combining these, we know:
From statement 1, we know Q is lighter than both P and S. We also know T is lighter than S. However, we don't know the relationship between Q and T, or between any of these people and R. For example, Q could be lighter than T, or T could be lighter than Q, or they could even have the same weight relative to the others based on this statement alone. Therefore, statement 1 alone is not sufficient to find the lightest person among all five.
Statement 2 says: "R weight > Q but < T".
Let's break this down:
Combining these, we get a sequence: \(Q < R < T\). This means Q is lighter than R, and R is lighter than T. Consequently, Q is also lighter than T.
From statement 2 alone, we know the relative weights of Q, R, and T. Q is the lightest among these three. However, we don't know the relationship between Q, R, T and P or S. We cannot determine the absolute lightest person among all five using only statement 2. Therefore, statement 2 alone is not sufficient to find the lightest person.
Now let's combine the information from both statements.
From statement 1, we have:
From statement 2, we have:
Let's put the sequence from statement 2 together with the information from statement 1.
We know \(Q < R < T\).
From statement 1, we know \(T < S\). So, we can extend the sequence: \(Q < R < T < S\). This tells us that among Q, R, T, and S, Q is the lightest.
Also from statement 1, we know \(Q < P\). This tells us Q is lighter than P.
So, we have established that Q is lighter than R, Q is lighter than T, Q is lighter than S, and Q is lighter than P. This means Q is lighter than all other four people (P, R, S, and T).
Therefore, by combining both statements, we can definitively determine that Q is the lightest person.
Since both statements together are needed to answer the question, the information provided is sufficient only when both statements are used.
Let's summarize the sufficiency of each statement and their combination:
| Statement(s) | Information Gained | Sufficient to Find Lightest? |
|---|---|---|
| Statement 1 Alone | \(Q < P\), \(Q < S\), \(T < S\) | No |
| Statement 2 Alone | \(Q < R < T\) | No |
| Statements 1 and 2 Combined | \(Q < P\), \(Q < R\), \(Q < T\), \(Q < S\) (derived) | Yes |
Based on this analysis, neither statement alone is sufficient, but both statements together are sufficient to answer the question "Who among P, Q, R, S and T is lightest in weight?".
| Concept | Explanation | Application in Question |
|---|---|---|
| Inequalities | Representing relationships like 'greater than' (>) and 'less than' (<). | Translating statements into \(Q < P\), \(S > T\), \(R > Q\), \(R < T\). |
| Combining Inequalities | Linking multiple inequalities to establish a sequence or overall relationship (e.g., \(a < b\) and \(b < c\) implies \(a < c\)). | Combining \(Q < R\) and \(R < T\) to get \(Q < T\). Combining \(Q < T\) and \(T < S\) to get \(Q < S\). |
| Data Sufficiency | Determining if the given information is enough to answer a specific question. | Evaluating if statement 1, statement 2, or both together provide enough detail to identify the lightest person. |
| Logical Deduction | Drawing necessary conclusions from given premises. | Concluding that Q is the lightest because it is lighter than every other individual mentioned in the combined statements. |
Data sufficiency questions are common in logical reasoning and analytical sections of exams. They test your ability to analyze given information and determine if it is sufficient to answer a specific question. Here are some key points to remember:
In this specific question about weights, the statements provide relative comparisons. By carefully combining these relative comparisons, we could establish a complete order for some individuals and then determine the lightest among all five.
In this question, a question is followed by two statements numbered (I) and (II). You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question. Read both the statements and decide the appropriate answer.
Among the five poles—I, N, C, H, and L—each having a different height, which pole is the tallest?
(I) I is shorter than N but taller than C. C is taller than only one pole.
(II) H is taller than L.
In this question, a question is followed by two statements numbered (I) and (II). You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question. Read both the statements and decide the appropriate answer.
Q. Among five people – A, B, C, D, and E – who is the tallest?
(I) A is taller than B. B is taller than C.
(II) D is taller than E.
A question is followed by two statements numbered (I) and (II). You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question. Read both the statements and decide the appropriate answer.
Among 5 sticks, B, U, N, M and D, each having a different height, which stick is the shortest?
(I) D is shorter than U. M is shorter than B.
(II) M is taller than D.
A question is followed by two statements numbered (I) and (II). You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question. Read both the statements and select the most appropriate answer.
Question:
Among five trees N, O, R, S, and T, each having a different height, which tree is the tallest?
Statements:
(I) T is taller than R. N is taller than T.
(II) R is shorter than O but taller than S.
In this question, a question is followed by two statements numbered (I) and (II). You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question. Read both the statements and decide the appropriate answer.
Among the five poles—I, N, C, H, and L—each having a different height, which pole is the shortest?
(I) L is shorter than N. H is shorter than I.
(II) H is taller than L.
Consider the given question and decide which of the following statements is sufficient to answer the question.
Is Raju fond of travelling?
Statements:
1. Raju has seen the Eastern, the Western, the Northern and the Southern parts of India.
2. Raju likes to be in the company of his friends.Consider the given question and decide which of the following statements is/are sufficient to answer the question.
Between X and Y who is the better dancer?
Statements:
1. X had given more dance auditions.
2. Y had given more dance performances than X.Consider the given question and decide which of the following statements is sufficient to answer the question.
How Swathi is related to Namitha?
Statements:
I. Swathi’s husband is the only son of Namitha’s mother.
II. Swathi’s brother and Namitha’s husband are cousins.
Please read the below equation and select an appropriate option from the following.
x + y = 10 ; y = x - 2
Quantity A is x.
Quantity B is y.
A lady wants to buy the following items in the given price range-
1. Tomato between Rs. 40 and Rs. 45 per kg.
2. Grapes in the price range of Rs. 80 and Rs. 90 per kg.
3. Milk packets at Rs. 23 per liter.
In which shop from the following will she definitely get all her items/
A. Shop S sells tomato at Rs. 22.5 per half kg, Grapes at Rs. 82 per kg and milk at Rs. 24 per liter.
B. Shop H sells grapes at Rs. 21 per quarter kg, milk at 12.5 per half litre and tomato at Rs. 22 per half kg.
C. Shop O sells milk at Rs. 11.5 per half litre, tomato at 21 per half kg and grapes at Rs. 43 per half kg.
D. Shop P sells tomato at Rs. 23.5 per half kg, grapes at Rs. 85 per kg and milk at Rs. 23 per litre.You are given a question and two statements. Identify which of the statements is/are sufficient to answer the question.
Question:
When is Yuvi's wedding anniversary?
Statements:
1: On the 7 th day of a month.
2. The month has 29 days only in a leap year.
One question and three statements are numbered (I), (II) and (III). You have to decide whether the facts given in the statements are sufficient to answer the question given below.
Question: What is the length of the rectangle?
Statement:
I. The perimeter of the rectangle is 80 meters.
II. The sum of the adjacent sides is 40 meters.
III. The width of the rectangle is 10 meters.
Choose the correct option.
A. Only I is sufficient.
B. Only I and II are sufficient.
C. III and one from I or II are sufficient.
D. II and one from I or III are sufficient.
A question and three statements are numbered (I), (II) and (III). You have to decide whether the facts given in the statements are sufficient to answer the question given below.
Question: Five people A, B, C, D and E are sitting facing each other in a circle. E is seated between whom?
Statement:
I. The person sitting to the left of B and to the right of A is the same.
II. D is to the right of B.
III. A sits between E and C.
Choose the correct option.
A. Only I and II are sufficient.
B. Only I and III are sufficient.
C. Only III is sufficient.
D. Facts are insufficient.