A statement is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement. Statement: Everyone should read newspaper daily. Arguments: I: Yes, because it will help knowing about what is happening around and increasing general awareness. II: No, because not everyone prepares for competitive exams.
Analyzing Arguments on Daily Newspaper Reading
This section evaluates the strength of arguments presented for the statement: "Everyone should read newspaper daily."
Statement Analysis
The core statement is a recommendation for the daily habit of reading newspapers.
Argument I: Strength Assessment
Argument I: "Yes, because it will help knowing about what is happening around and increasing general awareness."
- Justification: This argument highlights key benefits of reading newspapers: staying informed about current events ('what is happening around') and boosting overall knowledge ('increasing general awareness').
- Validity: These benefits are direct, significant, and applicable to everyone, regardless of their specific goals. Staying informed is a fundamental aspect of participating in society.
- Conclusion: Argument I is strong because it provides relevant and universally beneficial reasons supporting the statement.
Argument II: Strength Assessment
Argument II: "No, because not everyone prepares for competitive exams."
- Justification: This argument suggests that the necessity of reading newspapers is tied only to preparing for competitive exams.
- Validity: This is a weak argument. It relies on a narrow perspective. The value of reading newspapers for general awareness, understanding societal issues, and staying informed extends far beyond the context of exam preparation. Many individuals read newspapers for reasons unrelated to exams.
- Conclusion: Argument II is weak because its reasoning is overly specific and fails to acknowledge the broader advantages of reading newspapers.
Final Determination
Comparing the two arguments:
- Argument I presents valid and general reasons.
- Argument II presents a limited and specific reason that doesn't justify rejecting the statement.
Therefore, only Argument I is strong.
Similar Questions
- A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should different types of bowlers be included in the Indian cricket team?
Arguments:
I. Yes, because different types of bowlers play different roles in a team.
II. No, because the spectators like seeing fast bowlers. - A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should private schools be banned in India?
Arguments:
1. Yes, they are the reason for commercialisation of education.
2. No, because the rich people cannot send their child to government schools. - A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should electronic gadgets be allowed in an examination hall?
Arguments:
I. No, it is easy to cheat with their help in an examination.
II. Yes, electronic gadgets are costly and it is not safe to leave them outside the examination hall. A statement is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.
Statement:
Officers in the administrative departments should be transferred.
Arguments:
1. Yes, they get friendly with people and can be manipulated by them.
2. No, officers do not like to get transferred frequently.
- A statement is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.
Statement:
Oils should be totally removed from our diet.
Arguments:
I. Yes, removing oils from our diet will keep the budget in check.
II. No, some types of oils are essential for us as our body cannot produce them on its own. - A statement is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.
Statement:
Healthcare services should be nationalised.
Arguments:
I. Healthcare services are provided nationally in many countries.
II. Nationalisation of healthcare services will reduce the career prospects of doctors. - A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should the government encourage young entrepreneurs?
Arguments:
I. Yes, they will reduce the burden of unemployment.
II. Yes, they will contribute to the development of the country. - A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong/weak with respect to the question.
Question:
Should the government control the country's news channels?
Arguments:
P. News is controlled by the Government in many countries.
Q: No, controlling any news loses its reliability. - Read the given query and arguments carefully and decide which of the arguments is/are strong.
Query: Should there be a complete ban on tobacco selling in India?
Argument 1: No, this will render thousands of workers jobless.
Argument 2: Yes, tobacco is consumed by even minors who suffer severe health effects. - A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Is boarding school system beneficial to children?
Arguments:
(i) Yes, boarding school system separates children from their homes which is beneficial.
(ii) No, getting separated from parents for long periods of time may damage children's relationship with them, leaving the children feeling anxious or alone.
Important Questions from Statements and Arguments
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.
Statement: Should the sale of alcohol near highways be banned?
Argument I: No, people should have the freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.
Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should plastic bags be banned in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes, it is one of the sources of pollution and causes many diseases.
II. No, other alternatives of plastic may not be that colourful and attractive.A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should all criminals be given severe punishments?
Arguments:
1. Yes. It will induce fear in criminals and crime would reduce greatly.
2. No. Human life is precious, and criminals should also be given a chance to improve.
A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Are joint families better than nuclear families?
Arguments:
1. Yes, joint families ensure security and the burden of work is shared.
2. No, nuclear families ensure freedom and there is no disturbance.
A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should vegetarian food be banned in India?
Arguments:
I. No, it is cheap source of protein and other minerals and a lot of people can afford it.
II. No, it will violate people's freedom.
