Statement:
Oils should be totally removed from our diet.
Arguments:
I. Yes, removing oils from our diet will keep the budget in check.
II. No, some types of oils are essential for us as our body cannot produce them on its own.
Argument Strength Analysis: Oil in Diet
The question asks to evaluate the strength of two arguments regarding the complete removal of oils from the diet.
Analyzing Argument I: Budget Impact
Argument I states that removing oils will keep the budget in check.
- This argument focuses solely on financial aspects.
- The cost of oils varies greatly, and dietary changes impact budgets differently for individuals.
- Health implications are generally considered more critical than budget when discussing major dietary changes.
- Therefore, Argument I is considered weak as it doesn't address the primary health considerations of removing essential food components.
Analyzing Argument II: Nutritional Necessity
Argument II states that some oils are essential because the body cannot produce them.
- This argument highlights the nutritional importance of certain dietary oils, such as essential fatty acids (e.g., omega-3 and omega-6).
- These fatty acids are vital for bodily functions, including cell structure, hormone production, and nutrient absorption.
- Since the body cannot synthesize these essential oils, they must be obtained from the diet.
- Completely removing all oils would lead to deficiencies and health problems.
- Therefore, Argument II presents a strong, scientifically-backed reason against the total removal of oils from the diet.
Conclusion on Argument Strength
Based on the analysis:
- Argument I is weak due to its limited scope (budget) and lack of focus on health.
- Argument II is strong because it correctly identifies the essential nutritional role of certain oils that the body cannot produce, making their complete removal detrimental to health.
Thus, only Argument II is strong.
Similar Questions
- A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should different types of bowlers be included in the Indian cricket team?
Arguments:
I. Yes, because different types of bowlers play different roles in a team.
II. No, because the spectators like seeing fast bowlers. - A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should private schools be banned in India?
Arguments:
1. Yes, they are the reason for commercialisation of education.
2. No, because the rich people cannot send their child to government schools. - A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should electronic gadgets be allowed in an examination hall?
Arguments:
I. No, it is easy to cheat with their help in an examination.
II. Yes, electronic gadgets are costly and it is not safe to leave them outside the examination hall. A statement is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.
Statement:
Officers in the administrative departments should be transferred.
Arguments:
1. Yes, they get friendly with people and can be manipulated by them.
2. No, officers do not like to get transferred frequently.
- A statement is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.
Statement:
Healthcare services should be nationalised.
Arguments:
I. Healthcare services are provided nationally in many countries.
II. Nationalisation of healthcare services will reduce the career prospects of doctors. - A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should the government encourage young entrepreneurs?
Arguments:
I. Yes, they will reduce the burden of unemployment.
II. Yes, they will contribute to the development of the country. - A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong/weak with respect to the question.
Question:
Should the government control the country's news channels?
Arguments:
P. News is controlled by the Government in many countries.
Q: No, controlling any news loses its reliability. - Read the given query and arguments carefully and decide which of the arguments is/are strong.
Query: Should there be a complete ban on tobacco selling in India?
Argument 1: No, this will render thousands of workers jobless.
Argument 2: Yes, tobacco is consumed by even minors who suffer severe health effects. - A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Is boarding school system beneficial to children?
Arguments:
(i) Yes, boarding school system separates children from their homes which is beneficial.
(ii) No, getting separated from parents for long periods of time may damage children's relationship with them, leaving the children feeling anxious or alone. - A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should parents buy war-type video games for their children?
Arguments:
(i) Yes, such games are useful in developing strategy and planning skills in children.
(ii) No, war-type toys do not teach children good values.
Important Questions from Statements and Arguments
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.
Statement: Should the sale of alcohol near highways be banned?
Argument I: No, people should have the freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.
Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should plastic bags be banned in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes, it is one of the sources of pollution and causes many diseases.
II. No, other alternatives of plastic may not be that colourful and attractive.A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should all criminals be given severe punishments?
Arguments:
1. Yes. It will induce fear in criminals and crime would reduce greatly.
2. No. Human life is precious, and criminals should also be given a chance to improve.
A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Are joint families better than nuclear families?
Arguments:
1. Yes, joint families ensure security and the burden of work is shared.
2. No, nuclear families ensure freedom and there is no disturbance.
A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should vegetarian food be banned in India?
Arguments:
I. No, it is cheap source of protein and other minerals and a lot of people can afford it.
II. No, it will violate people's freedom.
