Statements:
All Hummingbirds are Storks.
Some Storks are Flamingos.
Conclusions:
I. Some Hummingbirds are Flamingos.
II. No Flamingos are Hummingbirds.
Logical Reasoning Analysis
This question tests the ability to deduce conclusions from given statements using logical reasoning.
Statement Analysis
We are given two statements:
- Statement 1: All Hummingbirds are Storks. (This means the set of Hummingbirds is entirely contained within the set of Storks).
- Statement 2: Some Storks are Flamingos. (This means there is at least one Stork that is also a Flamingo, indicating an overlap between the sets of Storks and Flamingos).
Conclusion Analysis
We need to determine if the conclusions logically follow from the statements.
Conclusion I: Some Hummingbirds are Flamingos.
Statement 1 places Hummingbirds entirely within Storks. Statement 2 states an overlap between Storks and Flamingos. However, this overlap might involve only those Storks that are NOT Hummingbirds. It is possible that no Hummingbirds are Flamingos.
Therefore, Conclusion I does not necessarily follow.
Conclusion II: No Flamingos are Hummingbirds.
Since we cannot be sure that Conclusion I ('Some Hummingbirds are Flamingos') is false (it's only uncertain), we also cannot be sure that Conclusion II ('No Flamingos are Hummingbirds') is true. It is possible that the group of Storks which are Flamingos also includes some Hummingbirds.
Therefore, Conclusion II does not necessarily follow.
Final Answer Determination
Based on the analysis, neither Conclusion I nor Conclusion II is guaranteed to be true based on the given statements.
Thus, the correct option is the one stating that neither conclusion follows.
Similar Questions
- Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All fathers are brothers.
All brothers are sons.
Conclusions:
(I) All fathers are sons.
(II) All brothers are fathers. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All flats are villas.
No villa is an apartment.
Conclusions:
(I) No flat is an apartment.
(II) No apartment is a villa. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All pins are bugs.
All pins are cows.
Conclusions:
(I): Some bugs are cows.
(II): All cows are pins. Read the given statement(s) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement(s).
Statement:
Most students know English language.
Conclusions:
1. Some students know English language.
2. Some students do not know English language.
- Two statements are given below. Decide which of the options logically follow from these statements.
Statement 1 All bags are toys.
Statement 2: Some toys are suitcases. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
(i) All ships are boats.
(ii) All anchors are ships.
Conclusions:
I. All anchors are boats.
II. Some ships are anchors.
III. No anchor is boat.
IV. Some boats are anchors. - Read the given statement(s) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statement(s).
Statements:
All Wolves are Rhinoceroses.
No Rhinoceroses are Kangaroos.
Conclusions:
I: No Kangaroos are Wolves.
II: Some Kangaroos are Wolves. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All doors are carpets.
No carpet is a mat.
Conclusions:
(I) No door is a mat.
(II) No mat is a carpet. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements: All kiwis are bananas. All bananas are grapes.
Conclusions (I): All kiwis are grapes.
Conclusions (II): Some grapes are bananas. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some lipsticks are tabs.
No tab is a kite.
Conclusions:
(I): Some lipsticks are kites.
(II): Some tabs are lipsticks.
Important Questions from Syllogism
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some students are players.
All players are male.
Conclusions:
I. All males are players.
II. Some males are students.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
No creative is an employer.
All experts are creative.
All workers are experts.
Conclusions:
I. No employer is an expert.
II. No worker is an employer.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some actors are choreographers.
All choreographers are producers.
Not a single producer is a director.
Conclusions:
I. Some actors are directors.
II. Not a single actor is a director.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements :
1. All flowers are tulips.
2. No tulips are whites.
Conclusions :
I. All tulips are flowers.
II. Some tulips are whites.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All rats are dogs.
Some rats are hens.
Conclusions:
I. Some rats are dogs.
II. Some hens are rats.
