Statements:
All sparrows are owls.
No sparrow is a parrot.
Conclusions:
(I): No owl is a parrot.
(II): No parrot is a sparrow.
Only conclusion (II) follows.
The correct answer is Only conclusion (II) follows.
To solve syllogisms accurately, we can use a Venn diagram to map the relationships between the categories.
1. Analyze the Statements:
"All sparrows are owls": This means the "Sparrows" circle is entirely contained within the "Owls" circle.
"No sparrow is a parrot": This means there is no overlap between the "Sparrows" circle and the "Parrots" circle.
2. Evaluate Conclusion (I): "No owl is a parrot."
From the statements, we know that the part of the "Owls" circle that contains "Sparrows" cannot be "Parrots."
However, there is no information about the rest of the "Owls" circle. It is entirely possible for the "Owls" circle to overlap with the "Parrots" circle, as long as that overlap doesn't touch the "Sparrows."
Since it is not a certainty, this conclusion does not follow.
3. Evaluate Conclusion (II): "No parrot is a sparrow."
Statement 2 explicitly says "No sparrow is a parrot."
In logic, "No A is B" is always reversible to "No B is A."
Since there is zero overlap between the two, this conclusion follows definitely.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All forests are hills.
Some hills are deserts.
Conclusions:
(I): All hills are forests.
(II): Some deserts are hills.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All bottles are ludo.
All ludo are dancer.
Conclusions:
(I): Some dancers are ludo.
(II): All bottles are dancers.