You have to consider the statement to be true, even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow from the given statements.
Statements:
1. All teachers are actors.
2. Some actors are women.
Conclusion:
I. All teachers are women.
II. Some women are teachers.
III. Some women are actors.
IV. All actors are teachers.
Only Conclusion III follows
To solve the logical reasoning problem, we need to evaluate which of the given conclusions follow from the provided statements.
Statements:
1. All teachers are actors.
2. Some actors are women.
Conclusions:
I. All teachers are women.
II. Some women are teachers.
III. Some women are actors.
IV. All actors are teachers.
Let's analyze each conclusion against the statements:
Conclusion I: "All teachers are women." The statement "All teachers are actors" combined with "Some actors are women" does not sufficiently conclude that all teachers are women. There is no statement saying all actors or all teachers are women, so this conclusion does not follow.
Conclusion II: "Some women are teachers." While some actors are women, not all actors are teachers or vice versa, so it cannot be directly concluded that some women are teachers from the statements given.
Conclusion III: "Some women are actors." This follows directly from Statement 2: "Some actors are women." Therefore, this conclusion is valid based on the given statements.
Conclusion IV: "All actors are teachers." Statement 1 tells us that all teachers are actors, but it does not state that all actors are teachers. Therefore, this conclusion does not follow.
Thus, Only Conclusion III follows.
A situation is given, followed by two conclusions I and II. Read the situation and both the conclusions carefully and select the correct answer.
Situation:
Since the past 15 years, 75% of the products in the world’s pottery market comes from Country K. However, the employment in the pottery industry of Country K has been consistently declining by 5-9% every year since the past 3 years.
Conclusions:
I. Even after declining employment, Country K has enough potters to continue contributing equally to the international market.
II. The local demand of pottery in Country K has substantially decreased leading to less interest among potters.
The statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement 1: All wheat are grain.
Statement 2: Some wheat are flour.
Conclusion I: Some grain are flour.
Conclusion II: Some flour are wheat.
Consider the given statements to be true and decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statements.
Statement 1: When water is cooled, it turns into ice.
Statement 2: When water is heated, it turns into steam.
Conclusion 1: Water is a solid.
Conclusion 2: Water is a gas.
Which of the following is a true statement?
In the following question, one or two statement(s) is/are given followed by two conclusions/assumptions, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true, even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Indicate your answer.
Statement: Some kings are queens. All queens are beautiful.
Conclusions: I. All kings are beautiful. II. All queens are kings.
The statement below is followed by three conclusions labelled I, II and III. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the three suggested conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
1) No school is an institution but they are establishment.
2) All establishments that are not institutions have buildings.
Conclusions:
I. Schools are not establishments.
II. All schools have buildings.
III. Schools do not have buildings.Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
The Gateway of India is in Mumbai.
Mumbai is in India.
Conclusion:
The Gateway of India is in India.
Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
Men who are handsome are generally of the intellectual type.
Vikram is handsome.
Conclusion:
Vikram is intellectual.Given is a statement, followed by four conclusions. Read the statement carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.
Statement:
This book can help because all good books help.
Conclusions:
I. This is not a good book.
II. This is a good book.
III. No good book helps.
IV. Some good books help.
Study the given statement and the conclusions carefully and decide which of the following conclusions follow(s) the given statement logically.
Statement:
The British introduced the postal system in India in 1764.
Conclusions:
I. Postal letters often are late, or they are lost.
II. Postmen get less salary, so they tend to do mistakes.