"The 'precautionary principle' and the 'polluter pays principle' are essential principles of the sustainable development." Explain both the principles and also their contribution in sustainable development referring to relevant case-laws.
The 'Precautionary Principle' and the 'Polluter Pays Principle' are fundamental to sustainable development, guiding environmental governance both globally and in India.
Precautionary Principle:
This principle mandates that where there is a threat of serious or irreversible environmental harm, lack of full scientific certainty should not delay cost-effective preventive measures. It shifts the burden of proof onto proponents of potentially harmful activities. By promoting proactive protection, it preserves natural resources and ecosystems for future generations and encourages foresight and risk assessment. In Vellore Citizens' Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996), the Supreme Court adopted this principle, emphasizing that authorities must anticipate, prevent, and address causes of environmental degradation.
Polluter Pays Principle:
This principle holds that the costs of preventing, controlling, and remedying pollution must be borne by the polluter. It internalizes environmental costs, discouraging industries and individuals from harmful practices, and funding remediation efforts. By making polluters accountable, it incentivizes adoption of cleaner technologies and sustainable economic practices. In Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India (Bichhri Village case) (1996), the Supreme Court directed polluting industries to bear the cost of remediation, reinforcing both compensatory and deterrent aspects.
Significance for Sustainable Development:
Together, these principles foster ecological balance. The Precautionary Principle emphasizes prevention of environmental harm, while the Polluter Pays Principle ensures accountability and resources for rectification. Collectively, they guide policies and judicial actions toward safeguarding the environment, promoting responsible development, and sustaining natural systems for present and future generations.
Answered By:
Sakshi Negi
Sakshi Negi is a Delhi-based journalist and content specialist with expertise in educational content and digital media, focusing particularly on government exam preparation and career guidance. With a degree in Journalism and Mass Communication from NRAI School of Mass Communication and her background as a Kendriya Vidyalaya alumna, she brings unique insights into the Indian education system and government sector opportunities.
Similar Questions
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Under what circumstances can the appropriate government commute the sentence of death and life imprisonment for anyother punishment? Discuss.Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
"Doctrine of foreseeability', not the 'proximity', is a correct test of 'remoteness'." Explain with the help of case-laws.Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Explain the principle of liability of master for the torts committed by his servant. Write case-laws.Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Describe the salient features of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955.
"Homicide means killing of a human being by a human being." Explain the statement and distinguish between culpable homicide amounting to murder and not amounting to murder.
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
"The definition of 'public servant' as per the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is only illustrative and not exhaustive." Comment."Right to private defence is a valuable right but it must be exercised reasonably." Explain with examples.
Discuss the law of defamation. Is this correct to say that law of defamation gives too much protection to 'reputation' and imposes too a great restriction on the freedom of speech? Comment.
"The law of torts is said to be a development of the maxim ubi jus ibi remedium." Illustrate your answer with the help of decided case-laws.
"Nuisance is no branch of negligence." Explain. Describe who can sue and who is liable for nuisance.
Important Questions from Miscellaneous
Write a note in 150 words
Mendelian and non-Mendelian traits.Write a note in 150 words
Theoretical significance of Purum kinship-system.Write a note in 150 words
Smell as a signal among non-human primates.Write a note in 150 words
Osteodontokeratik culture and its makers.Discuss the Miocene hominoid remains and their significance in evolution.
