"Homicide means killing of a human being by a human being." Explain the statement and distinguish between culpable homicide amounting to murder and not amounting to murder.
Homicide, in its broadest sense, denotes the killing of one human being by another. It may be lawful, as in self-defence or execution of a judicial order, or unlawful, which is the concern of criminal law. Within the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860, unlawful homicide is primarily addressed under the rubric of “culpable homicide.”
Section 299 IPC defines culpable homicide as causing death by doing an act with the intention of causing death, with the intention of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that such act is likely to cause death.
Section 300 IPC defines murder as a graver form of culpable homicide. Thus, every murder is culpable homicide, but not every culpable homicide is murder. The distinction lies in the presence and intensity of mens rea and the surrounding circumstances. Culpable homicide amounts to murder if:
However, Section 300 provides five exceptions where culpable homicide does not amount to murder: grave and sudden provocation; exceeding the right of private defence; public servant exceeding powers in good faith; death caused in a sudden fight without cruelty; and death with the free consent of a person above eighteen years.
The classic distinction, emphasized in Reg. v. Govinda (1876), rests on the degree of intention and knowledge. Murder reflects malice aforethought, whereas culpable homicide not amounting to murder embodies a lower degree of culpability.
Answered By:
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Under what circumstances can the appropriate government commute the sentence of death and life imprisonment for anyother punishment? Discuss.
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
"Doctrine of foreseeability', not the 'proximity', is a correct test of 'remoteness'." Explain with the help of case-laws.
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Explain the principle of liability of master for the torts committed by his servant. Write case-laws.
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Describe the salient features of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955.
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
"The definition of 'public servant' as per the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is only illustrative and not exhaustive." Comment.
"Right to private defence is a valuable right but it must be exercised reasonably." Explain with examples.
Discuss the law of defamation. Is this correct to say that law of defamation gives too much protection to 'reputation' and imposes too a great restriction on the freedom of speech? Comment.
"The law of torts is said to be a development of the maxim ubi jus ibi remedium." Illustrate your answer with the help of decided case-laws.
"Nuisance is no branch of negligence." Explain. Describe who can sue and who is liable for nuisance.
Critically examine the provisions relating to few major offences which fall under the 'offences against marriage' in the criminal law of India. Support your answer with case-law.
Write a note in 150 words
Mendelian and non-Mendelian traits.
Write a note in 150 words
Theoretical significance of Purum kinship-system.
Write a note in 150 words
Smell as a signal among non-human primates.
Write a note in 150 words
Osteodontokeratik culture and its makers.
Discuss the Miocene hominoid remains and their significance in evolution.