"The law of torts is said to be a development of the maxim ubi jus ibi remedium." Illustrate your answer with the help of decided case-laws.
The maxim ubi jus ibi remedium, meaning “where there is a right, there is a remedy,” forms the cornerstone of the law of torts. It reflects the idea that violation of a legal right must have a corresponding remedy, ensuring enforceability of rights. Unlike criminal law, where the state prosecutes, or contract law, which enforces agreements, tort law addresses civil wrongs where the injured party seeks compensation or injunction.
Tort law has progressively expanded to recognize new rights and remedies. Originally confined to specific torts, it now encompasses broader principles, allowing remedies even for novel wrongs, provided a legal right has been infringed.
A classic authority is Ashby v. White (1703). A qualified voter was maliciously prevented from voting by an officer. Although his candidate won, the court awarded damages, holding that the very denial of the legal right constituted actionable injury, even without tangible loss. This case emphasized that violation of a right suffices for a remedy.
Other torts further illustrate the maxim. In nuisance, the right to peaceful enjoyment of property is protected; unreasonable interference invites remedies such as damages or injunctions. In negligence, the evolving duty of care reflects recognition of new rights, as in Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932), where the court established manufacturers’ duty toward consumers, thereby expanding remedies for harm caused by defective products.
Thus, the law of torts continually adapts to ensure that recognized rights are not illusory but backed by enforceable remedies, affirming ubi jus ibi remedium as its guiding philosophy.
Answered By:
Similar Questions
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Under what circumstances can the appropriate government commute the sentence of death and life imprisonment for anyother punishment? Discuss.Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
"Doctrine of foreseeability', not the 'proximity', is a correct test of 'remoteness'." Explain with the help of case-laws.Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Explain the principle of liability of master for the torts committed by his servant. Write case-laws.Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Describe the salient features of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955.
"Homicide means killing of a human being by a human being." Explain the statement and distinguish between culpable homicide amounting to murder and not amounting to murder.
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
"The definition of 'public servant' as per the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is only illustrative and not exhaustive." Comment."Right to private defence is a valuable right but it must be exercised reasonably." Explain with examples.
Discuss the law of defamation. Is this correct to say that law of defamation gives too much protection to 'reputation' and imposes too a great restriction on the freedom of speech? Comment.
"Nuisance is no branch of negligence." Explain. Describe who can sue and who is liable for nuisance.
Critically examine the provisions relating to few major offences which fall under the 'offences against marriage' in the criminal law of India. Support your answer with case-law.
Important Questions from Miscellaneous
Write a note in 150 words
Mendelian and non-Mendelian traits.Write a note in 150 words
Theoretical significance of Purum kinship-system.Write a note in 150 words
Smell as a signal among non-human primates.Write a note in 150 words
Osteodontokeratik culture and its makers.Discuss the Miocene hominoid remains and their significance in evolution.
