Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Under what circumstances can the appropriate government commute the sentence of death and life imprisonment for anyother punishment? Discuss.
The power to commute sentences by the “appropriate government” is derived from both constitutional and statutory provisions. Constitutionally, Articles 72 and 161 empower the President and Governors to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or commutations. Statutorily, Sections 432 and 433 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, confer similar authority on the Union or State government, depending on the case.
Section 433 specifically allows the government to commute: a death sentence to any other punishment under the Indian Penal Code; life imprisonment to imprisonment up to fourteen years or to a fine; rigorous imprisonment to simple imprisonment; and simple imprisonment to a fine.
This discretion is guided by humanitarian and practical considerations such as old age, ill health, or recommendations from courts and prison authorities. However, it is not unfettered. Judicial review, as upheld in Maru Ram v. Union of India (1980) and Epuru Sudhakar v. Government of A.P. (2006), ensures fairness and prevents arbitrariness.
Answered By:
Sarvesh Jha
Sarvesh Jha is a seasoned government exam mentor with firsthand success in top exams like IBPS PO, SBI PO, CDS, RRB JE, SSC CGL, BPSC, and CTET. Known for his deep conceptual clarity and strategic approach, he has guided over 5000 students through personalized mentorship. He has been creating well researched content for last 5 years.
Similar Questions
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
"Doctrine of foreseeability', not the 'proximity', is a correct test of 'remoteness'." Explain with the help of case-laws.Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Explain the principle of liability of master for the torts committed by his servant. Write case-laws.Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Describe the salient features of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955.
"Homicide means killing of a human being by a human being." Explain the statement and distinguish between culpable homicide amounting to murder and not amounting to murder.
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
"The definition of 'public servant' as per the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is only illustrative and not exhaustive." Comment."Right to private defence is a valuable right but it must be exercised reasonably." Explain with examples.
Discuss the law of defamation. Is this correct to say that law of defamation gives too much protection to 'reputation' and imposes too a great restriction on the freedom of speech? Comment.
"The law of torts is said to be a development of the maxim ubi jus ibi remedium." Illustrate your answer with the help of decided case-laws.
"Nuisance is no branch of negligence." Explain. Describe who can sue and who is liable for nuisance.
Critically examine the provisions relating to few major offences which fall under the 'offences against marriage' in the criminal law of India. Support your answer with case-law.
Important Questions from Miscellaneous
Write a note in 150 words
Mendelian and non-Mendelian traits.Write a note in 150 words
Theoretical significance of Purum kinship-system.Write a note in 150 words
Smell as a signal among non-human primates.Write a note in 150 words
Osteodontokeratik culture and its makers.Discuss the Miocene hominoid remains and their significance in evolution.
