Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some cards are postcards. Some cards are envelopes. All envelopes are copies. Conclusions: I. Some copies are envelopes. II. Some postcards are copies. III. Some cards are copies.
Only conclusions I and III follow
This question falls under the category of logical reasoning, specifically dealing with syllogisms or deductive reasoning from given statements to determine valid conclusions. The key is to assume the statements are absolutely true and only derive conclusions that logically and necessarily follow from them.
Let's break down the given statements:
These statements describe relationships between different categories: Cards, Postcards, Envelopes, and Copies. We can visualize these relationships using Venn diagrams or simply analyze the implications of each statement.
Now, let's examine each conclusion based on the truth of the statements.
Look at Statement 3: "All envelopes are copies." This statement means that the entire set of envelopes is contained within the set of copies. If every single envelope is a copy, it necessarily follows that there exist some items within the set of copies that are envelopes (namely, all the envelopes). This is a direct and unavoidable consequence of Statement 3.
Conclusion I logically follows from the statements.
Consider the relationships: Some cards are postcards (Statement 1), some cards are envelopes (Statement 2), and all envelopes are copies (Statement 3). We know there's an overlap between Cards and Postcards, and an overlap between Cards and Envelopes. We also know that the entire group of Envelopes is part of the Copies group.
However, the fact that some cards overlap with postcards and some cards overlap with envelopes (which are copies) does not guarantee that the 'some cards' that are postcards are the same as, or even overlap with, the 'some cards' that are envelopes. Therefore, there is no necessary connection established between Postcards and Copies based *only* on these statements. It is possible that the postcards and the copies are completely separate categories, even while satisfying the statements.
Conclusion II does not logically follow from the statements.
Consider Statement 2: "Some cards are envelopes." Now look at Statement 3: "All envelopes are copies." If there are some items that are both cards and envelopes, and every item that is an envelope is also a copy, then those very same items must be both cards and copies. If 'X' is a card and 'X' is an envelope (as per Statement 2), and if 'X' is an envelope, then 'X' is also a copy (as per Statement 3). Therefore, 'X' is a card and 'X' is a copy. This means some cards are copies.
Conclusion III logically follows from the statements.
Based on our analysis:
Therefore, only conclusions I and III logically follow from the given statements.
| Statement/Conclusion | Relationship | Logical Deduction | Follows? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Statement 1 | Some Cards are Postcards | Partial overlap | N/A |
| Statement 2 | Some Cards are Envelopes | Partial overlap | N/A |
| Statement 3 | All Envelopes are Copies | Envelopes $\subset$ Copies | N/A |
| Conclusion I | Some Copies are Envelopes | Directly from Statement 3 ($\text{If E} \subset \text{C}, \text{ then some C are E}$) | Yes |
| Conclusion II | Some Postcards are Copies | No guaranteed link through Cards | No |
| Conclusion III | Some Cards are Copies | From Statement 2 & 3 ($\text{Cards } \cap \text{ Envelopes } \ne \emptyset \text{ and Envelopes } \subset \text{ Copies} \Rightarrow \text{Cards } \cap \text{ Copies } \ne \emptyset$) | Yes |
Syllogisms are a fundamental part of deductive reasoning. They consist of premises (statements) and a conclusion. A conclusion is valid if it must be true whenever the premises are true.
Mastering syllogisms requires careful attention to the exact wording of the statements and drawing only those conclusions that are logically required.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the statements.
Statements:
All lemons are plums.
All plums are dates.
Some dates are mangoes.
Conclusions:
I. Some lemons are mangoes.
II. Some mangoes are plums.
III. All lemons are dates.
IV. Some mangoes are dates.
Three statements are given followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some spices are medicines.
All medicines are chemicals.
No chemical is cheap.
Conclusions:
I. Some medicines are cheap.
II. Some chemicals are spices.
III. No medicine is cheap.
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. Some Z are X.
II. Some W are Z.
Conclusions:
I. Some X are not W.
II. Some X are not Z.
Three Statements are given followed by Three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some mobiles are flat.
All flats are TVs.
Some TVs are plastic.
Conclusions:
I. Some mobiles are TVs.
II. Some flats are plastic.
III. All plastic are TVs.
Three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III.Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
No cup is a plate.
All cups are utensils.
Some bottles are cups.
Conclusions:
I. Some utensils are not plates.
II. Some bottles are not plates.
III. No bottle is a plate.
Three statements are followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follow/s from the given statements.
Statements:
Some watches are projectors.
All projectors are lamps.
Some heaters are watches.
Conclusions:
(I) Some heaters are projectors.
(II) Some lamps are heaters.
(III) All watches are lamps
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. No A is B.
II. No C is B.
Conclusion:
I. Some C are not A.
II. Some A are B.
Consider the given statement(s) to be true and decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement.
Statement 1: All elephants are men.
Statement 2: All men are socks.
Conclusion I: Some socks are elephants.
Conclusion II: All elephants are socks.
In the question, a word is represented by only one set of numbers as given in any one of the alternatives. The sets of numbers given in the question are represented by two classes of alphabets in two matrices given below. The columns and rows of Matrix 1 are numbered from 0 to 4 and that of Matrix II are numbered from 5 to 9. A letter from these matrices can be represented first by its row and next by its column, e.g., 'A' can be represented by 04, 12, etc., and 'U' can be represented by 59, 66, etc. Similarly, you have to identify the set for the word 'ROOT'.
MATRIX I | |||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 0 | B | C | D | E | A |
| 1 | D | E | A | B | C |
| 2 | C | D | E | A | B |
| 3 | A | B | C | D | E |
| 4 | E | A | B | C | D |
MATRIX II | |||||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
| 5 | R | O | N | T | U |
| 6 | T | U | R | O | N |
| 7 | O | N | T | U | R |
| 8 | U | R | O | N | T |
| 9 | N | T | U | R | O |
Consider the given statement/s to be true and decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement.
Statements: 1. All fish are tortoise.
2. No tortoise is a crocodile.
Conclusion: 1. No crocodile is a fish.
II. No fish is a crocodile.
The statements below are followed by conclusions labeled I, II and III. Assuming that the information in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with generally established facts, decide which conclusion(s) logically and definitely follow(s) from the information given in the statements.
Statements:
All twenty are thirty.
All thirty are forty.
All forty are sixty.
All sixty are seventy.
Conclusions:
I. Some forty are thirty.
II. Some seventy are sixty.
III. No thirty is twenty.The statements below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Assuming that the information in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with generally established facts, decide which conclusion(s) logically and definitely follow(s) from the information given in the statements.
Statements:
All Strong are animals.
Some animals are Tigers.
All Tigers are Sharp.
Conclusions:
I. Some Strong are Sharp.
II. No Strong is Sharp.The statements below are followed by conclusions labelled I, II and III. Assuming that the information in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with generally established facts, decide which conclusion(s) logically and definitely follow(s) from the information given in the statements.Statements:
Some women are weak.
Some weaks are female.
All female are iron.
All iron are gold.Conclusions:
I. Some weaks are iron.
II. Some gold are weaks.
III. Some women are female.
The statements below are followed by two conclusions labeled I and II. Assuming that the information in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with generally established facts, decide which conclusion(s) logically and definitely follow(s) from the information given in the statements.Statements:
Some teaspoons are glasses.
All teddies are teaspoons.
Conclusions:
I. Some teddies are glasses.
II. Some glasses are teddies.
The statements below are followed by two conclusions labeled I and II. Assuming that the information in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with generally Established facts, decide which conclusion(s) logically and definitely follow(s) from the Information, Given in the Statements.
Statements:
All bangles are rings.
Some rings are toys.
Some toys are dolls.
Conclusions:
I. Some rings are bangles.
II. Some dolls are rings.