Statements:
All kings are bombs.
No parrots are kings.
Conclusions:
(I) Some bombs are not parrots.
(II) Some bombs are kings.
Statement Analysis
We are given two statements:
- Statement 1: All kings are bombs.
- Statement 2: No parrots are kings.
We need to determine if the conclusions logically follow from these statements.
Conclusion Evaluation
Conclusion (I): Some bombs are not parrots.
From Statement 1, we know that the set of 'kings' is entirely contained within the set of 'bombs'.
From Statement 2, we know that the set of 'kings' and the set of 'parrots' are completely separate (they have no members in common).
Since all kings are bombs, and no kings are parrots, it logically follows that the bombs which are kings cannot be parrots. Therefore, there exist bombs that are not parrots. Conclusion (I) follows.
Conclusion (II): Some bombs are kings.
Statement 1 states: "All kings are bombs."
Assuming that the category 'kings' is not empty (which is a standard logical convention for such problems), this statement directly implies that if something is a king, it is also a bomb.
Therefore, the set of kings is a subset of the set of bombs. This means there are bombs that are also kings. Conclusion (II) follows.
Final Decision
Both Conclusion (I) and Conclusion (II) logically follow from the given statements.
Similar Questions
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some glasses are spoons.
All spoons are forks.
Conclusions:
(I) Some glasses are forks.
(II) All forks are spoons.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements: All girls are hens. No hen is a cat.
Conclusion (I): No girl is a cat.
Conclusion (II): Some cats are hens.
- Read the given statement(s) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement(s).
Statements:
All cows are buttons.
All fingers are buttons.
Conclusions:
(I) No cows are fingers.
(II) Some fingers are cows. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some bugs are moths.
Some moths are parrots.
Conclusions:
(I) Some parrots are bugs.
(II) All moths are bugs. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All angry are birds.
Some angry are pigs.
Conclusion (I): Some birds are pigs.
Conclusion (II): All pigs are birds. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some mugs are goats.
All goats are squares.
Conclusions:
(I) Some mugs are squares.
(II) Some squares are goats. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All speakers are radios.
No radio is a television.
Conclusions:
(I) No speaker is a television.
(II) Some televisions are radios. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some doctors are eagles.
No snakes are doctors.
Conclusions:
(I) Some eagles are not snakes.
(II) All eagles are doctors. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some Indians are Americans.
Some Americans are Russians.
Conclusions:
(I) No Russian is an American.
(II) All Indians are Russians. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some mats are carpets.
All carpets are rugs.
Conclusions:
(I) Some mats are rugs.
(II) All rugs are carpets.
Important Questions from Syllogism
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some students are players.
All players are male.
Conclusions:
I. All males are players.
II. Some males are students.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
No creative is an employer.
All experts are creative.
All workers are experts.
Conclusions:
I. No employer is an expert.
II. No worker is an employer.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some actors are choreographers.
All choreographers are producers.
Not a single producer is a director.
Conclusions:
I. Some actors are directors.
II. Not a single actor is a director.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements :
1. All flowers are tulips.
2. No tulips are whites.
Conclusions :
I. All tulips are flowers.
II. Some tulips are whites.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All rats are dogs.
Some rats are hens.
Conclusions:
I. Some rats are dogs.
II. Some hens are rats.
