M.M. Punchhi Commission on Centre-State Relations has recommended the disposal of a bill reserved for the consideration of the Union Executive within
six months.
Understanding the M.M. Punchhi Commission on Centre-State Relations
The M.M. Punchhi Commission was constituted by the Government of India in 2005 to look into the relations between the Centre and the States. This commission provided several recommendations aimed at improving the functioning of the federal system in India, addressing various aspects of Centre-State ties, including legislative relations, administrative relations, financial relations, and the role of Constitutional functionaries like the Governor.
Reserved Bills and Presidential Consideration
Under Article 200 of the Constitution of India, a Governor can reserve a Bill passed by the State Legislature for the consideration of the President of India. This power is used in specific circumstances, such as when the Bill might endanger the position of the State High Court, or if it deals with matters potentially repugnant to Union law. Once a Bill is reserved, it requires the assent of the President to become law.
A significant issue that has often arisen concerning reserved Bills is the delay in obtaining the President's decision. The Constitution does not prescribe a time limit within which the President must give assent, reject the Bill, or return it for reconsideration. This lack of a time limit can lead to uncertainty and affect the legislative process of the state.
M.M. Punchhi Commission's Recommendation on Disposal Time Limit
Recognizing the problems caused by indefinite delays in the disposal of Bills reserved for the consideration of the Union Executive (President), the M.M. Punchhi Commission made a specific recommendation. The Commission felt that there should be a reasonable time frame for the Union Executive to decide on such Bills.
The M.M. Punchhi Commission recommended that the President should take a decision on a Bill reserved for consideration within a period of six months. This recommendation was intended to streamline the process and prevent undue delays, ensuring that the legislative intent of the state is not held up indefinitely.
| Aspect | M.M. Punchhi Commission Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Disposal of Reserved Bills (President) | Decision within six months. |
| Purpose | To avoid indefinite delays in the legislative process of states. |
Therefore, the M.M. Punchhi Commission on Centre-State Relations recommended the disposal of a bill reserved for the consideration of the Union Executive within six months.
Revision Table: Key Punchhi Commission Recommendations
| Area | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Role of Governor | Appointment procedures, discretionary powers, removal process review. |
| Reserved Bills | Decision by President within six months. |
| Financial Relations | Greater flexibility for states in utilizing funds; review of fiscal transfers. |
| Inter-State Council | Strengthening the Council's role as a platform for policy coordination. |
Additional Information on the M.M. Punchhi Commission
The M.M. Punchhi Commission was chaired by Justice Madan Mohan Punchhi, a former Chief Justice of India. The commission was mandated to examine and review the working of the existing arrangements between the Union and States, various pronouncements of the courts, and recent trends in Centre-State relations. It submitted its report in 2010. The report is comprehensive and covers a wide range of issues impacting Centre-State dynamics in India's federal structure. While not all recommendations have been implemented, the report serves as an important reference document for understanding and potentially reforming Centre-State relations.
- The Commission was set up in 2005 and submitted its report in 2010.
- It was tasked with examining the entire gamut of Centre-State relations.
- Its recommendations covered administrative, legislative, financial, and social justice aspects.
- The recommendation regarding the time limit for reserved bills is one of its notable proposals.
Similar Questions
As per the Cabinet Resolution of 1st January, 2015, the NITI Aayog consists of:
1. Prime Minister of India
2. Governing Council comprising of Chief Minister of all the States and Lieutenant Governors of Union Territories
3. Rural Development Minister4. Chief Executive Officer to be appointed by the Prime Minister
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Which one of the following is not an objective of NITI Aayog?
Which of the following States/UTs are included in the Northern Zonal Council?
Which of the following are the functions of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)?
1. Inquiry at its own initiative on the violation of human rights
2. Inquiry on a petition presented to it by a victim
3. Visit to jails to study the condition of the inmates
4. Undertaking and promoting research in the field of human rights
Select the correct answer using the code given below.Which one of the following statements regarding the Human Rights Council is not correct?
Which one of the following statements about the Solicitor General of India (SGI) is not correct?
Which among the following is/are the objectives of the NITI Aayog?
1. Imposing policies on the States /UTs
2. Allocation of funds at National and State levels
3. Design strategies and long-term policies and programme frameworks
Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Which of the following statements about National Human Rights Commission, India is/are correct?
1. It can intervene in court proceedings involving human rights violations with the approval of the court
2. It can undertake research in the field of human rights
3. It cannot investigate human rights violation on its own initiative
Select the answer using the code given below:
Important Questions from Non-Constitutional Bodies/Statutory bodies
When was the Planning Commission of India established?
Which among the following is not a Statutory Body/Constitutional Body?
In which of the following years was the Planning Commission of India set up?
In which year the Rashtriya Mahila Aayog was founded?
Which of the following is not a constitutional body?
