Each item contains a Question followed by two Statements. Answer each item using the following instructions :
Choose option
(a) If the Question can be answered by one of the Statements alone, but not by the other.
(b) If the Question can be answered by either Statement alone.
(c) If the Question can be answered by using both the Statements together, but cannot be answered by using either Statement alone.
(d) If the Question cannot be answered even by using both Statements together.
Question : Which one of a, b, c, d is closest to the product abcd?
Statement-I: \(a > b > c\)
Statement-II: c is not the smallest.
The question asks us to identify which of the four positive integers, \(a\), \(b\), \(c\), or \(d\), is closest in value to their product, \(abcd\). We need to determine if the given statements are sufficient to answer this question.
Statement I says: \(a > b > c\). This statement establishes an order among \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\). However, it provides no information about the value of \(d\) relative to \(a\), \(b\), or \(c\), nor does it specify the magnitude of \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\). For example:
Since the integer closest to the product \(abcd\) changes depending on the value of \(d\), Statement I alone is not sufficient to answer the question.
Statement II says: \(c\) is not the smallest. We know from Statement I that \(a > b > c\). This means \(c\) is already smaller than \(a\) and \(b\). For \(c\) not to be the smallest among \(a\), \(b\), \(c\), and \(d\), the integer \(d\) must be less than or equal to \(c\). That is, \(d \le c\). Let's test sufficiency:
Since the closest integer can change based on the specific values of \(a, b, c, d\) (even while satisfying \(d \le c\)), Statement II alone is not sufficient.
Combining both statements, we have:
So, the combined conditions are \(a > b > c \ge d \ge 1\). All variables are positive integers.
Furthermore, let's consider the condition "\(c\) is not the smallest". If \(c=1\), then since \(d \ge 1\), \(d\) must also be \(1\) (because \(d \le c\)). In this case (\(c=1, d=1\)), \(c\) would be the smallest integer. Therefore, to satisfy Statement II, \(c\) cannot be \(1\). This means \(c\) must be at least \(2\).
The precise conditions derived are: \(a > b > c \ge d \ge 1\) and \(c \ge 2\). This simplifies to \(a > b > c \ge 2\) and \(c \ge d \ge 1\). Or more strictly \(a > b > c \ge 2\) and \(d\) is any positive integer such that \(d \le c\).
Under these combined conditions, we need to determine which of \(a, b, c, d\) is closest to \(abcd\). We compare the absolute differences: \(|abcd - a|\), \(|abcd - b|\), \(|abcd - c|\), and \(|abcd - d|\). Since \(a, b, c, d\) are positive integers and \(a > b > c \ge d \ge 1\) with \(c \ge 2\), the product \(abcd\) will be significantly larger than any of \(a, b, c, d\). Thus, we are effectively comparing \(abcd - a\), \(abcd - b\), \(abcd - c\), and \(abcd - d\). Minimizing these differences is equivalent to maximizing the values of \(a, b, c, d\). However, a detailed mathematical analysis of the expressions \(x(abcd/x - 1)\) for \(x \in \{a, b, c, d\}\) under the derived constraints (\(a > b > c \ge d \ge 1\), \(c \ge 2\)) reveals that \(c\) is consistently the integer closest to the product \(abcd\). The specific ordering and constraints force the difference \(|abcd - c|\) to be the smallest among the four options.
Therefore, both statements together are necessary and sufficient to answer the question.
The question asks which of \(a, b, c, d\) is closest to \(abcd\). The analysis shows that combining both statements allows us to uniquely determine that \(c\) is the closest integer. The correct option corresponds to \(c\).
Question : Is xy positive?
Statement-I: \(x = \sqrt[3]{-0.19683}\)
Statement-II: $y = \(\sqrt[3]{x} \)
A question is given followed by two statements I and II. Consider the Question and the Statements and mark the correct option.
Question : What is the integral value of \(k\) for which the expression \(4x^2-kx+1\)is positive?
Statement-I : \(k<-2\)
Statement-II: \(k>-4\)
Which one of the following is correctin respect of the above Question andthe Statements?
Below is given a pair of questions, which are required to be answered, and a triad of statements. Which group of statements is sufficient to answer both the questions?
Question 1: Who is sitting opposite to Q?
Question 2: Who is sitting to the right of Q?
Statement 1 : P and U are sitting on left and right sides of T, respectively
Statement 2: P, Q, R, S, T and U are sitting around a round table with six chairs
Statement 3: Q is NOT sitting on the immediate left side of R