In a square of opposition, if 'No animals with horns are carnivores' is false, which of the following is the correct code?
codes:
A. 'Some animals with horns are carnivores' is true.
B. 'Some animals with horns are not carnivores' is true.
C. 'All animals with horns are carnivores' is false
D. 'All the animals with horns are carnivores' is undermined.
A and D Only
In the traditional square of opposition, the four standard-form propositions about a subject-predicate pair are: A (universal affirmative, 'All S are P'), E (universal negative, 'No S are P'), I (particular affirmative, 'Some S are P'), and O (particular negative, 'Some S are not P').
Here S = 'animals with horns' and P = 'carnivores', and we are told the E proposition 'No animals with horns are carnivores' is false.
E and I are contradictories: they cannot both be true and cannot both be false - exactly one of them must be true. Since E is false, its contradictory I ('Some animals with horns are carnivores') must be true. This confirms code A.
A and E are contraries: they cannot both be true, but they can both be false. Knowing only that E is false does not by itself fix the truth value of A ('All animals with horns are carnivores') - it could be true or it could be false. So the truth value of the A proposition remains logically undetermined, which confirms code D.
I and O are subcontraries: they cannot both be false, but they can both be true. Since I has already been established as true, this relation places no constraint that would make O ('Some animals with horns are not carnivores') definitely true - O's truth value is likewise left undetermined, so code B (claiming O is definitely true) is incorrect.
Code C claims the A proposition is definitely false, but as shown above the contrary relation only tells us A and E cannot both be true; it does not force A to be false whenever E is false, so code C is also incorrect.
Therefore, only codes A and D validly follow from the falsity of the E proposition, making A and D only the correct answer.
Which of the following statements are logically equivalent?
A. Some cricketers are kind men.
B. Some kind men are cricketers.
C. Some cricketers are not non-kind men.
D. Some non-kind men are not non-cricketers.
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Which of the following statements is contrary to the statement- "No football players are kind-hearted human beings"?
If the statement-"Some athletes are kind human beings" is given as true, then which of the following statements can be immediately inferred to be false?
Which of the following statements is contradictory to the statement - "Some birds are mammals"?
If the statement - "Some animals are not birds" is given as false, then which of the following statements can be immediately inferred to be false?
Which of the following is contrary to the statement "No mammals are birds"?
If the statement "Some animals are birds" is given as false then which of the following statements can be immediately inferred to be false?
Which of the following propositions can be directly inferred from the statement - "All mammals are four-legged animals?
Which of the following statements are contradictory to each other?
A. All objects are perishable.
B. Some objects are not perishable.
C. Some objects are perishable.
D. No objects are perishable.
Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Which of the following statements is contradictory to the statement-" all dogs are friendly animals" ?
Which of the following statements are so related that they can not both be true but could both be false?
A. All Biologists are outstanding teachers.
B. Some Biologists are outstanding teachers.
C. No Biologists are outstanding teachers.
D. Some Biologists are not outstanding teachers.
Choose the correct answer from the options given below: