In a lever-operated compressor servicing tool (Class 1 lever), if the load arm length is decreased while the effort arm length is kept constant, what will be the effect on its mechanical advantage?
Mechanical advantage increases
The problem involves a lever-operated compressor servicing tool which uses a Class 1 lever. In this system, the mechanical advantage (\(MA\)) is defined by the ratio of the effort arm length to the load arm length. The key formula to understand here is:
\(MA = \frac{\text{Length of Effort Arm}}{\text{Length of Load Arm}}\)
Given that the effort arm length is kept constant while the load arm length is decreased, the following analysis can be made:
Therefore, when the load arm length is decreased while keeping the effort arm length constant, the mechanical advantage increases.
This is because with a shorter load arm, less effort is required to lift the same load, effectively increasing the mechanical advantage.
Hence, the correct answer is: Mechanical advantage increases.
In Lever, mechanical advantage is the ratio of _______.
Which of the following is an example of a second class lever?
Which of the following is an example of a first class lever?
If we compare the effort arm length with the load arm length in a class 1 lever, ________
If we compare the effort arm length with the load arm length in a Class 2 lever, _______.
A pair of plier and scissor are together considered as a _______ Class 1 lever.
A ramp is used to lift a box to a platform 2 m high. To reduce the effort required, the ramp length is increased from 4 m to 8 m. Assuming negligible friction, what remains unchanged?
The effort in a class 1 lever is in __________ direction(s).
In Lever, mechanical advantage is the ratio of _______.
The maximum efficiency of a machine
What is the maximum mechanical advantage of a lifting machine?
(where m is a constant called coefficient of friction).
Which one of the following is CORRECT statement about Simple machines?
A simple machine will be self-locking, if its efficiency is: