All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

If we compare the effort arm length with the load arm length in a class 3 lever, then which of the below is true?

This question was previously asked in
RRB ALP 2018 CBT 2 Fitter Question Paper (21-Jan-2019) (Shift 3)
The correct answer is effort arm length is always < load arm length

Understanding Levers and Their Classes

Levers are simple machines that help us multiply force or change the direction of force. They consist of a rigid bar that pivots around a fixed point called a fulcrum.

Levers are classified into three types based on the relative positions of the fulcrum (F), the effort (E), and the load (L).

  • Class 1 Lever: The fulcrum is between the effort and the load (F is between E and L). Examples: seesaw, crowbar.
  • Class 2 Lever: The load is between the fulcrum and the effort (L is between F and E). Examples: wheelbarrow, nutcracker.
  • Class 3 Lever: The effort is between the fulcrum and the load (E is between F and L). Examples: human forearm, fishing rod, tweezers.

Effort Arm vs. Load Arm in Class 3 Levers

In the context of levers, we talk about two important lengths:

  • Effort Arm: The perpendicular distance from the fulcrum to the point where the effort is applied.
  • Load Arm: The perpendicular distance from the fulcrum to the point where the load is located.

Let's specifically look at a class 3 lever. As defined, in a class 3 lever, the effort (E) is located between the fulcrum (F) and the load (L). We can represent this arrangement linearly as F - E - L.

Based on this arrangement:

  • The effort arm is the distance from F to E.
  • The load arm is the distance from F to L.

Since E is between F and L, the distance from F to E is always shorter than the distance from F to L.

Therefore, in a class 3 lever, the effort arm length is always less than the load arm length.

Lever Class Arrangement (F, E, L) Effort Arm vs. Load Arm Mechanical Advantage (MA) Common Examples
Class 1 F is between E and L Effort Arm can be >, <, or = Load Arm MA can be >, <, or = 1 Seesaw, Crowbar
Class 2 L is between F and E Effort Arm is always > Load Arm MA is always > 1 Wheelbarrow, Nutcracker
Class 3 E is between F and L Effort Arm is always < Load Arm MA is always < 1 Human Forearm, Tweezers

Mechanical Advantage of Class 3 Levers

The mechanical advantage (MA) of a lever is calculated as the ratio of the load arm length to the effort arm length:

\( \text{MA} = \frac{\text{Load Arm Length}}{\text{Effort Arm Length}} \)

Since in a class 3 lever, the effort arm length is always less than the load arm length, the ratio \( \frac{\text{Load Arm Length}}{\text{Effort Arm Length}} > 1 \). Wait, this is incorrect. Let's recheck the MA formula and relationship with arm lengths.

The mechanical advantage is also defined as the ratio of the Load (Output Force) to the Effort (Input Force):

\( \text{MA} = \frac{\text{Load}}{\text{Effort}} \)

For equilibrium, the principle of moments states that Effort \(\times\) Effort Arm = Load \(\times\) Load Arm.

Rearranging this gives: \( \frac{\text{Load}}{\text{Effort}} = \frac{\text{Effort Arm Length}}{\text{Load Arm Length}} \)

So, \( \text{MA} = \frac{\text{Effort Arm Length}}{\text{Load Arm Length}} \).

In a class 3 lever, the effort arm length is always less than the load arm length. Therefore, the mechanical advantage of a class 3 lever is always less than 1 \( (\text{MA} < 1) \).

This means class 3 levers are used to gain speed or distance at the expense of force. You need to apply more effort than the load, but the load moves through a larger distance or at a greater speed than the point where the effort is applied.

Conclusion on Effort Arm vs. Load Arm in Class 3 Levers

Based on the fixed arrangement of fulcrum, effort, and load in a class 3 lever (F-E-L), the effort arm (distance from F to E) is always shorter than the load arm (distance from F to L).

Comparing this to the options provided:

  • Option 1: effort arm length can be greater than, equal to or less than the length of the load arm (Incorrect for Class 3)
  • Option 2: effort arm length is always = load arm length (Incorrect for Class 3)
  • Option 3: effort arm length is always < load arm length (Correct for Class 3)
  • Option 4: effort arm length is always > load arm length (Incorrect for Class 3)

Thus, for a class 3 lever, the effort arm length is always less than the load arm length.

Revision Table: Lever Classes Summary

Feature Class 1 Lever Class 2 Lever Class 3 Lever
Fulcrum Position Between E and L At one end (L is between F and E) At one end (E is between F and L)
Effort Arm vs. Load Arm Can be >, <, or = Effort Arm > Load Arm Effort Arm < Load Arm
Mechanical Advantage (MA) Can be >, <, or = 1 MA > 1 MA < 1
Purpose (Generally) Change direction, gain force/distance Gain force Gain speed/distance

Additional Information on Lever Types and Uses

Understanding the three classes of levers helps explain how various tools and parts of the body work. While Class 1 levers are versatile, Class 2 levers are designed for force multiplication, and class 3 levers are designed for increasing speed or range of motion.

For example, your forearm acts as a class 3 lever when lifting an object. The elbow is the fulcrum, the effort is applied by the biceps muscle where it attaches to the forearm (between the elbow and hand), and the load is the object in your hand. This arrangement allows your hand to move through a much larger arc than the small contraction of the biceps muscle, enabling activities like throwing a ball or lifting quickly.

Another common class 3 lever example is a fishing rod. The fulcrum is the hand holding the rod near the base, the effort is applied by the other hand on the rod further up, and the load is the fish pulling on the line at the tip. This allows small movements of the hands to translate into large movements of the rod tip.

Recognizing the positions of the fulcrum, effort, and load is key to identifying the class of a lever and understanding its mechanical properties, including the relationship between the effort arm length and the load arm length.

Was this answer helpful?

Similar Questions

  1. In Lever, mechanical advantage is the ratio of _______.

  2. The force applied to overcome a load is called ______.
  3. In class 1 levers, effort and load moves in ______.
  4. In a lever-operated compressor servicing tool (Class 1 lever), if the load arm length is decreased while the effort arm length is kept constant, what will be the effect on its mechanical advantage?

  5. The distance of the effort from the fulcrum is called the ________.

  6. Which of the following best defines machine efficiency?

  7. A ramp is used to lift a box to a platform 2 m high. To reduce the effort required, the ramp length is increased from 4 m to 8 m. Assuming negligible friction, what remains unchanged?

  8. A boy uses a wheelbarrow to carry sand. The wheel acts as the pivot, the sand is placed in the tray, and the boy lifts the handles. In this arrangement, the sand represents
  9. If we compare the effort arm length with the load arm length in a class 1 lever, ________

  10. If we compare the effort arm length with the load arm length in a Class 2 lever, _______.


Important Questions from Levers and Simple Machines

  1. In Lever, mechanical advantage is the ratio of _______.

  2. The maximum efficiency of a machine

  3. What is the maximum mechanical advantage of a lifting machine?

    (where m is a constant called coefficient of friction).

  4. Which one of the following is CORRECT statement about Simple machines?

  5. Efficiency of Simple machine is the ratio of:

Need Expert Advice?
Upcoming Exams
RRB JE
October 27, 2026
RRB ALP
November 03, 2026
Test Series
RRB ALP img
Railways
RRB ALP 2026 Mock Test series
1035 Tests 1 Tests Free
1292 Attempts
4.3(246)
English, Hindi

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App