In a certain code language, PRIEST is written as AVJMOK and FULL is written as XYQQ. How will FLIRT be written in that language?

Question

Prepp Team · Accepted Answer

Understanding Coding and Decoding Patterns

This question involves a coding-decoding pattern where specific words are coded into other words based on a hidden rule. We are given two examples of coding: PRIEST is coded as AVJMOK, and FULL is coded as XYQQ. We need to use these examples to decode the word FLIRT.

Analyzing the Given Codes

Let's look at the letters in the coded words and see if there's a consistent relationship or if the coding is based on position or simple substitution. We'll examine the pairs:

PRIEST → AVJMOK
FULL → XYQQ

Now, let's check the letters in the word FLIRT and see if they appear in either PRIEST or FULL:

F is present in FULL
L is present in FULL
I is present in PRIEST
R is present in PRIEST
T is present in PRIEST

Since all the letters in FLIRT are present in the given examples, it is highly probable that this is a direct substitution cipher. This means each letter in the original word is replaced by a specific, consistent letter in the coded word, regardless of its position.

Establishing the Letter Substitutions

Based on the direct substitution assumption, we can derive the code for each letter:

Original Letter	Coded Letter (from PRIEST → AVJMOK)	Coded Letter (from FULL → XYQQ)	Confirmed Substitution
P	A	-	P → A
R	V	-	R → V
I	J	-	I → J
E	M	-	E → M
S	O	-	S → O
T	K	-	T → K
F	-	X	F → X
U	-	Y	U → Y
L	-	Q	L → Q

Coding the Word FLIRT

Now that we have the substitution rules for each letter in FLIRT, we can code the word:

F codes to X (from FULL → XYQQ)
L codes to Q (from FULL → XYQQ)
I codes to J (from PRIEST → AVJMOK)
R codes to V (from PRIEST → AVJMOK)
T codes to K (from PRIEST → AVJMOK)

Putting these together, FLIRT is coded as XQJVK.

Comparing with Options

Let's compare our derived code XQJVK with the given options:

Option 1: XQJVK (Matches our result)
Option 2: RQJVK (Does not match)
Option 3: XQJYK (Does not match)
Option 4: XSJVK (Does not match)

Our derived code XQJVK matches Option 1.

Conclusion on Coding Pattern

The coding pattern used in this question is a simple direct substitution cipher. Each letter is consistently replaced by another specific letter, as determined by the provided examples.

Revision Table: Coding and Decoding Concepts

Concept	Description	Example Type
Coding	Converting a word/message into a hidden form based on a rule.	PRIEST → AVJMOK
Decoding	Converting the hidden form back into the original word/message.	AVJMOK → PRIEST
Substitution Cipher	A method where letters are replaced by other letters or symbols.	Direct Substitution (as seen here), Shift Cipher (e.g., Caesar cipher), etc.
Pattern Analysis	Identifying the rule or logic used in the coding process by comparing original and coded words.	Comparing PRIEST to AVJMOK to find letter replacements.

Additional Information on Reasoning Patterns

Coding and decoding questions are common in reasoning sections of various exams. They test your ability to identify patterns and apply them. Common types of patterns include:

Letter Shifting: Each letter is shifted a fixed number of positions forward or backward in the alphabet (e.g., A → C, B → D is a shift of +2).
Direct Substitution: As seen in this problem, each letter has a fixed replacement letter. The replacement is determined from given examples.
Reverse Letter Coding: Letters are replaced by their counterparts from the reverse alphabetical order (A → Z, B → Y).
Position-based Coding: The code depends on the letter's position in the word (e.g., first letter shifts +1, second +2, etc.).
Mixed Patterns: A combination of the above rules or other logical associations.

Solving these questions requires careful observation and systematic analysis of the given examples to uncover the specific coding rule.

Prepp Team · Answer

RQJVK

Prepp Team · Answer

XQJYK

Prepp Team · Answer

XSJVK