How does the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court define "Crime against Humanity"? Explain.
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (1998) defines crimes against humanity in Article 7 as specific acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population, with knowledge of the attack. This distinguishes such crimes from isolated incidents by requiring both scale or organization and intent.
The enumerated acts include murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation or forcible transfer, and imprisonment in violation of international law. They also cover torture; sexual crimes such as rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, or sterilization; persecution on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, or gender grounds; enforced disappearance; apartheid; and other inhumane acts intentionally causing great suffering or serious injury.
The requirement of a “widespread or systematic” campaign underscores that these crimes occur as part of deliberate state or organizational policy, while the “knowledge” element establishes individual culpability. Thus, Article 7 ensures accountability for grave abuses targeting civilians.
Answered By:
Harsh Raj
Harsh Raj is a successful government exam expert, having cleared multiple stages of SSC CGL, IBPS PO, CDS, RRB NTPC, and Delhi Police SI exams himself and mentored more than 5000 students through direct mentorship. His expertise is in creating well researched content, especially MCQs, which have been directly asked by relevant commissions in multiple exams.
Similar Questions
Where does the Constitution of India vest executive power with respect to subject-matters in the Concurrent List over which both the Union and States have legislative powers? Explain.
If Article 21 confers on a person the right to live a dignified life, does it also include a right not to live ? Examine the Constitutional Provisions with the help of decided case laws.
"It is often said that the decision of the Supreme Court in L. Chandra Kumar Vs. Union of India (1997) has defeated the very raison d'etre of establishing administrative tribunals in India." Discuss.
"The doctrine of Separation of Powers in its classical structural form is not followed in any country." Critically evaluate this statement with reasons.
Critically examine, with the help of decided cases, the power of the President to consult the Supreme Court.
"The Directive Principles of State Policy are fundamental in the governance of the country, and it shall be the duty of the State to apply these Principles in making laws." Illustrate the legislations, which have been enacted for the implementation of Directive Principles.
"It is significant that the State shall secure the operation of legal system to promote justice on the basis of equal opportunity." Examine the provisions under the Constitution and Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
What are the powers, privileges and immunities of Houses of Parliament in India? Do they have the power to expel any of their members for breach of privileges? If so, are such expulsions subject to judicial review ? Discuss.
"In any democratic society, judicial review of administrative action is the soul of the system. Without it, democracy, and rule of law cannot be maintained." Explain with example.
"It was claimed in the Constituent Assembly that the Constitution of India has in fact, laid down a very 'facile' procedure for the amendment of the Constitution." Do you think the Doctrine of Basic Structure significantly limits the amending power under Article 368? Elucidate.
Important Questions from Miscellaneous
Write a note in 150 words
Mendelian and non-Mendelian traits.Write a note in 150 words
Theoretical significance of Purum kinship-system.Write a note in 150 words
Smell as a signal among non-human primates.Write a note in 150 words
Osteodontokeratik culture and its makers.Discuss the Miocene hominoid remains and their significance in evolution.
