"It is often said that the decision of the Supreme Court in L. Chandra Kumar Vs. Union of India (1997) has defeated the very raison d'etre of establishing administrative tribunals in India." Discuss.
Administrative tribunals were created to provide speedy, specialized adjudication and to reduce the heavy caseload of High Courts. Their purpose was to function as alternative forums delivering technical justice with efficiency. However, the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997) reshaped this framework. The Court held that judicial review of tribunal decisions by the High Courts and the Supreme Court is part of the Constitution’s basic structure and cannot be excluded. As a result, a two-tier review process was established: decisions of tribunals are first challenged before a Division Bench of the concerned High Court, with a further appeal possible before the Supreme Court.
While the judgment reaffirmed the supremacy of judicial review, it also drew criticism for undermining the intended utility of tribunals. By making them subject to High Court scrutiny, the decision effectively transformed tribunals into preliminary forums, reintroducing delays and costs.
Answered By:
Sarvesh Jha
Sarvesh Jha is a seasoned government exam mentor with firsthand success in top exams like IBPS PO, SBI PO, CDS, RRB JE, SSC CGL, BPSC, and CTET. Known for his deep conceptual clarity and strategic approach, he has guided over 5000 students through personalized mentorship. He has been creating well researched content for last 5 years.
Similar Questions
Where does the Constitution of India vest executive power with respect to subject-matters in the Concurrent List over which both the Union and States have legislative powers? Explain.
Critically examine, with the help of decided cases, the power of the President to consult the Supreme Court.
If Article 21 confers on a person the right to live a dignified life, does it also include a right not to live ? Examine the Constitutional Provisions with the help of decided case laws.
"The doctrine of Separation of Powers in its classical structural form is not followed in any country." Critically evaluate this statement with reasons.
What are the powers, privileges and immunities of Houses of Parliament in India? Do they have the power to expel any of their members for breach of privileges? If so, are such expulsions subject to judicial review ? Discuss.
"The Directive Principles of State Policy are fundamental in the governance of the country, and it shall be the duty of the State to apply these Principles in making laws." Illustrate the legislations, which have been enacted for the implementation of Directive Principles.
"It was claimed in the Constituent Assembly that the Constitution of India has in fact, laid down a very 'facile' procedure for the amendment of the Constitution." Do you think the Doctrine of Basic Structure significantly limits the amending power under Article 368? Elucidate.
"In any democratic society, judicial review of administrative action is the soul of the system. Without it, democracy, and rule of law cannot be maintained." Explain with example.
Examine the provisions under the Indian Constitution that authorize the Parliament to legislate on the subject-matters of the State List of the Seventh Schedule.
"It is significant that the State shall secure the operation of legal system to promote justice on the basis of equal opportunity." Examine the provisions under the Constitution and Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
Important Questions from Miscellaneous
How will you manage a case of misplaced copper-T (Cu-T)?
Describe the embryogenesis, clinical features and principles of management of cleft palate.
Write short notes in 150 words:
MetagenesisWrite short notes in 150 words:
Book lungsWrite short notes in 150 words:
Paedomorphosis
