Consider the following statements: 1. Under Part III of the Constitution of India, individuals can enforce rights guaranteed by this Part when they are violated by the action of a government authority. 2. Under Part III of the Constitution of India, individuals can enforce rights guaranteed by this Part when they are violated by not only the action of a government authority, but also by its inaction. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Both 1 and 2
This question pertains to the enforcement of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Part III of the Constitution of India, specifically focusing on whether these rights can be enforced against the 'action' or 'inaction' of government authorities.
Part III of the Constitution: Enforcement of Fundamental Rights
Part III of the Indian Constitution enumerates the Fundamental Rights essential for the development of individuals. A key feature of these rights is their enforceability. The Constitution empowers individuals to approach the higher judiciary (Supreme Court and High Courts) for the protection and enforcement of these rights if they are violated.
Analyzing Statement 1: Enforcement Against State Action
Statement 1 claims that individuals can enforce rights guaranteed by Part III when violated by the action of a government authority. This statement is correct. The concept of 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution is broad and includes:
- The Government and Parliament of India.
- The Government and Legislature of each State.
- All local or other authorities within the territory of India.
- All local or other authorities under the control of the Government of India.
If any of these entities perform an action that infringes upon an individual's Fundamental Rights (e.g., unlawful detention, discrimination, arbitrary seizure of property), the individual can seek legal remedy. The Supreme Court, under Article 32, and High Courts, under Article 226, can issue various writs (like Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, Quo Warranto) to remedy such violations caused by state action.
Analyzing Statement 2: Enforcement Against State Inaction
Statement 2 suggests that rights can be enforced not only against the action but also against the inaction of a government authority. This statement is also correct.
While Fundamental Rights are often discussed in the context of preventing the State from taking certain actions, they also impose positive obligations on the State in certain situations. When the State fails to act or perform a duty legally required of it, and this failure (inaction) results in the violation of a Fundamental Right, individuals can seek enforcement.
For instance:
- The writ of Mandamus can be issued to compel a public authority to perform its statutory or public duty. If the State fails to perform such a duty, leading to a violation of rights, Mandamus can be sought.
- Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) has been interpreted by the judiciary to include the State's duty to protect life and liberty. A failure by the State to provide adequate security or prevent foreseeable harm might be considered inaction violating Article 21.
Therefore, the judiciary can direct the State to act when its inaction violates Fundamental Rights.
Conclusion on Correctness
Based on the analysis:
- Statement 1 is correct as Fundamental Rights are enforceable against the actions of government authorities.
- Statement 2 is correct as Fundamental Rights are also enforceable against the inaction of government authorities when such inaction leads to a violation of these rights.
Consequently, both statements provided are accurate reflections of the scope of enforceability of Fundamental Rights under Part III of the Constitution of India.
Similar Questions
Which of the following descriptions with regard to Parliamentary Privilege for Members of the Parliament of India is/are correct?
- 1. The Speaker is empowered to refer suo moto any question of privilege for investigation.
- 2. A question of privilege is accorded priority over other items in the List of Business.
- 3. The privilege extends to freedom from preventive arrest or detention.
Select the answer using the code given below:
Which of the following statements with respect to the right to have a legal aid is/are correct?
1. Under the Constitution of India, it is given under the Directive Principles of State Policy.
2. It is the duty of the police to inform the nearest Legal Aid Committee immediately after the arrest of a person.
Select the correct answer using the code given below.
The Citizenship Act, 1955 deals with the determination of citizenship on or after
Which of the following conditions is/are necessary for the issue of a writ of certiorari in India?
1. There should be a tribunal or an officer having legal authority to determine questions affecting rights of subjects and having a duty to act judicially.
2. Such tribunal or officer has acted without jurisdiction
Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Who among the following is given discretionary powers under the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution of India to set up a Tribes Advisory Council in a State which has Scheduled Tribes but not Scheduled Areas?
Which of the following statements regarding the Indian federal system is/are correct?
1. All States have equal representation in the Rajya Sabha.
2. Consent of a State is not required for altering its boundaries.
3. There is no dual citizenship in India.
Select the correct answer using the code given below.Which of the following are the powers of the Supreme Court of India?
1. Original jurisdiction in a dispute between the Government of India and one or more States
2. The power to hear appeals from the High Courts
3 Passing decrees and orders for doing justice in any matter before it
4. Render advice to the President of India in matters of law
Select the correct answer using the code given below.Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding Right to Education in India?
1. Free and compulsory education should be provided to all children of the age of six to fourteen years.
2. The imperative of the provision of the Right to Education Act, 2009 is that schools must have qualified teachers and basic infrastructure.
3. There should be quality education without any discrimination on the ground of economic, social and cultural background.
Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Which of the following statements regarding Article 21 of the Constitution of India is/ is correct?
1. Article 21 is violated when under-trial prisoners are detained under judicial custody for an indefinite period.
2. Right to life is one of the basic human rights and not even the state has the authority to violate that right.
3. Under Article 21, the right of a woman to make reproductive choices is not a dimension of personal liberty.
Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Which one of the following statements regarding freedom to manage religious affairs as per the Constitution of India isnotcorrect?
Important Questions from Basics of Constitution
Which of the following statements with respect to Article 22 of the Constitution and Criminal Law on fundamental rights of an arrested person is NOT correct?
India recognizes the Right to _______ as being part of Right to Life (Article 21).
What was the amendment done to the Indian Constitution by 52 nd amendment done in 1985?
Which of the following languages is NOT a part of the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution?
Which of the following constitutional amendments provided for the Right to Education?
