The landmark Supreme Court judgment in the case Subhash Sharma v. Union of India (1991) refers to which one of the following basic features of the Constitution of India?
Judicial Review
Understanding the Subhash Sharma v. Union of India Case (1991)
The question asks about the landmark Supreme Court judgment in the case of Subhash Sharma v. Union of India (1991) and which basic feature of the Constitution of India it refers to.
This case is significant in the context of the Indian judiciary. It dealt with the process of appointment and transfer of judges to the Supreme Court and the High Courts. The case examined the interpretation of Articles 124 and 217 of the Constitution, which govern these appointments.
Key Issue in Subhash Sharma v. Union of India
The core issue revolved around the primacy given to the opinion of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) in the appointment and transfer of judges. The judgment discussed the consultative process required under the Constitution and the respective roles of the executive and the judiciary in this process.
In this case, the Supreme Court reviewed the executive's action regarding judicial appointments and transfers, essentially exercising its power to examine the legality and constitutional validity of such actions.
Relating the Case to Basic Features of the Constitution
Let's look at the options provided:
- Judicial Review
- Rule of Law
- Free and fair elections
- Fundamental Rights
The Subhash Sharma case involved the Supreme Court scrutinizing governmental action related to judicial appointments. This act of scrutiny and examination of executive or legislative actions by the judiciary to ensure they are in accordance with the Constitution is known as Judicial Review.
- Judicial Review: This is the power of the judiciary to examine the constitutionality of legislative enactments and executive orders of both the Central and State Governments. Actions found contrary to the Constitution are declared illegal, unconstitutional, and invalid by the Supreme Court and the High Courts. The Subhash Sharma case is a clear instance of the Supreme Court exercising this power to interpret constitutional provisions related to appointments and review executive conduct in that regard.
- Rule of Law: While the case upholds principles associated with the Rule of Law (like actions being subject to law), the specific aspect highlighted by the Court's intervention in reviewing appointments is Judicial Review.
- Free and fair elections: This basic feature relates to the electoral process, which was not the subject matter of the Subhash Sharma case.
- Fundamental Rights: Although the independence of the judiciary is crucial for protecting Fundamental Rights, the direct focus of the Subhash Sharma case was on the appointment procedure and the interpretation of constitutional provisions related to the judiciary, rather than a specific Fundamental Right itself.
Therefore, the Subhash Sharma v. Union of India (1991) judgment primarily refers to and exemplifies the basic feature of the Constitution known as Judicial Review, as the Court reviewed and interpreted the constitutional provisions governing judicial appointments and transfers.
Revision Table: Basic Features and Related Concepts
| Basic Feature | Description | Relevance to Subhash Sharma Case (1991) |
|---|---|---|
| Judicial Review | Power of courts to examine constitutionality of laws/actions. | Court reviewed executive actions regarding judicial appointments. |
| Rule of Law | All actions, incl. government, must be subject to law. | Underpins judicial independence, but Judicial Review is the specific mechanism used here. |
| Free & fair elections | Process for choosing representatives. | Not related to the case subject matter. |
| Fundamental Rights | Basic rights guaranteed by the Constitution. | Independent judiciary protects rights, but case focused on appointment mechanism itself. |
Additional Information: Judicial Appointments and Judicial Review
The Subhash Sharma case (1991) is sometimes referred to as the 'First Judges Case'. It was followed by subsequent cases (the Second and Third Judges Cases) that further clarified and evolved the process of judicial appointments, eventually leading to the collegium system for appointing judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts. These subsequent cases also involved the Supreme Court exercising its power of Judicial Review to interpret the Constitution regarding judicial appointments.
Basic Structure Doctrine: The concept of basic features arose from the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), where the Supreme Court held that Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, but cannot alter its 'basic structure'. Judicial Review, Rule of Law, Free and fair elections, and Fundamental Rights are often considered part of this basic structure, meaning they cannot be taken away or significantly altered by constitutional amendment.
The Subhash Sharma case, by interpreting the constitutional provisions related to judicial appointments and reviewing executive actions, reinforced the principle of judicial independence, which is crucial for the effective functioning of Judicial Review and the protection of Fundamental Rights.
Similar Questions
Which one among the following motions cannot be made while introducing an ordinary Bill in the Parliament ?
Which one of the following amendments to the Constitution of India has introduced reservations in education and in public employment for people from the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) of society?
The category of ‘Overseas Citizens of India was entered in the Citizenship Act of India through an amendment in the year:
As per the Constitution of India, the Writ of Prohibition relates to an order:
1. issued against judicial and quasi-judicial authority.
2. to prohibit an inferior Court from proceeding in a particular case where it has no jurisdiction to try.
3. to restrain a person from holding a public office to which he is not entitled.
Select the correct answer using the code given below.
According to B. R. Ambedkar, which one among the following Articles is the 'heart and soul' of the Constitution of India?
Which of the following statements with respect to the right to have a legal aid is/are correct?
1. Under the Constitution of India, it is given under the Directive Principles of State Policy.
2. It is the duty of the police to inform the nearest Legal Aid Committee immediately after the arrest of a person.
Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Who among the following filed the Writ Petition that led to the famous verdict of the Supreme Court of India recognising the Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right?
Through the Forty Second Amendment to the Constitution of India, which of the following was/were inserted into its Preamble?
1. Liberty of thought, expression and belief' was substituted by Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship'.
2. The expression Unity of the Nation' was substituted by Unity and Integrity of the Nation'.
Select the correct answer using the code given below.
As per the State List under the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India, the States have jurisdiction over agricultural land in connection with which of the following subjects?
1. Taxes on agricultural income
2. Duties in respect of succession of agricultural land
3. Estate duty agricultural land in respect of Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Which one of the following statements relating to cultural and educational rights in India isnotcorrect?
Important Questions from Basics of Constitution
Which article of Indian constitution is related with Official language of the Union?
In which year was the Indian ‘Wildlife (Protection) Act’ implemented?
Which article of the Indian constitution was called the 'heart and soul' of the constitution by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar?
In 1946, who among the following was made the interim president of the Indian Constituent Assembly ?
Who was the Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly of India?
