A question is given followed by two Statements I and II. Consider the Question and the Statements and mark the correct option. Question: Statement I: P has two sisters, R and S. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above Question and the Statements?
How is Q related to P?
Statement II: R's father is the brother of Q.
The Question cannot be answered even using any of the Statements.
The question asks us to determine the relationship between Q and P based on two given statements. We need to examine each statement individually and then combine them to see if the relationship can be established.
This statement tells us about P's immediate family members, specifically his/her siblings. We know P has two sisters, R and S. This implies R and S are P's sisters. However, this statement does not mention Q at all. Therefore, based on Statement I alone, we cannot determine how Q is related to P.
This statement provides a connection between R's father and Q. It states that R's father and Q are siblings (R's father is male, and he is Q's brother). This statement mentions R and Q, but it does not directly mention P or establish a link to P unless we use information from Statement I. Based on Statement II alone, we cannot determine how Q is related to P.
Let's combine the information from both statements:
Since R's father is P's father, we can deduce from Statement II that P's father is the brother of Q.
This establishes a relationship between P's father and Q. Q is the sibling of P's father. This means Q could be P's paternal uncle (if Q is male) or P's paternal aunt (if Q is female).
The question asks "How is Q related to P?". While we know Q is a sibling of P's father, the gender of Q is not provided in either statement or their combination. Without knowing Q's gender, we cannot definitively say whether Q is P's uncle or aunt. Therefore, the exact relationship between Q and P cannot be uniquely determined.
Let's evaluate if the question can be answered:
Therefore, the question cannot be answered even by using both statements together because Q's gender is unknown, which prevents us from specifying the relationship (uncle or aunt).
| Source | Information Provided | Can relation of Q to P be found? |
|---|---|---|
| Statement I | P has sisters R and S. | No (Q not mentioned). |
| Statement II | R's father is brother of Q. | No (P not directly mentioned, Q's gender unknown). |
| Both Statements I & II | P's father is brother of Q. | No (Q's gender unknown, cannot specify uncle/aunt). |
Based on the analysis, neither statement alone nor both statements together provide sufficient information to determine the exact relationship between Q and P.
Understanding common blood relations is crucial for solving such problems.
| Relation | Description |
|---|---|
| Father's brother | Paternal Uncle |
| Father's sister | Paternal Aunt |
| Mother's brother | Maternal Uncle |
| Mother's sister | Maternal Aunt |
| Brother's son | Nephew |
| Brother's daughter | Niece |
| Sister's son | Nephew |
| Sister's daughter | Niece |
When tackling blood relation problems, especially those with statements, consider the following:
In this specific problem, the missing piece of information was the gender of Q, which prevented determining if Q was P's uncle or aunt, hence the question cannot be answered definitively.
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
How many possible values of (p + q + r) are there satisfying 1/p + 1/q + 1/r = 1, where p, q and r are natural numbers (not necessarily distinct)?
What comes at X and Y respectively in the following sequence?
January, January, December, October, X, March, October, Y, September
Team X scored a total of N runs in 20 overs. Team Y tied the score in 10% less overs. Had Team Y’s average run rate (runs per over) been 50% higher, the scores would have been tied in 12 overs. How many runs were scored by Team X?
The price (p) of a commodity is first increased by k%; then decreased by k%; again increased by k%; and again decreased by k%. If the new price is q, then what is the relation between p and q?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and pragmatic message conveyed by the author of the passage?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?