1. The Swadeshi Movement had its genesis in the Anti-Partition movement, which was started to oppose the British decision to partition Bengal.
2. Aurobindo Ghosh was in favour of extending the movement to the rest of India and carrying it beyond the programme of just Swadeshi and Boycott to a full-fledged political mass struggle.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Statement 1 Analysis: Swadeshi Movement Origin
The first statement is correct. The Swadeshi Movement, a significant phase of the Indian independence struggle, indeed originated as a protest against the British decision to partition Bengal in 1905. This Anti-Partition Movement mobilized widespread public opposition, leading directly to the adoption of Swadeshi (use of domestic goods) and Boycott as key strategies.
Statement 2 Analysis: Aurobindo Ghosh's Role
The second statement is also correct. Aurobindo Ghosh was a prominent leader who advocated for a more radical approach. He supported expanding the movement's scope beyond just economic boycott and Swadeshi goods. Ghosh envisioned it as a platform for a nationwide political mass struggle aimed at achieving complete self-rule (Swaraj).
Conclusion: Correct Statements
Since both statements accurately describe the origins and a key leader's vision regarding the Swadeshi Movement, the correct option is that both statements are correct.
Important Questions from India's Freedom Movement
The `Swadeshi' and 'Boycott' were adopted as methods of struggle for the first time during the
The Montague-Chelmsford Proposals were related to
Consider the following :
1. Calcutta Unitarian Committee
2. Tabernacle of New Dispensation 3. Indian Reform Association
Keshab Chandra Sen is associated with the establishment of which of the above?
What was the main reason for the split in the Indian National Congress at Surat in 1907?
The plan of Sir Stafford Cripps envisaged that after the Second World War
