Read the following passage and answer the items that follow the passage. Your answers to these items should be based on the passage only. Passage-1 One of the dismal realities of the agricultural sector in independent India has been that it never experienced a high-growth phase, unlike the non-agricultural economy. The highest decadal growth (compound annual growth rate or CAGR) for agriculture has been just 3-5% in the 1980s. Also, after experiencing a spurt in decadal growth during the 1980s, agricultural growth suffered relative stagnation thereafter. This is in sharp contrast to non-agricultural growth, which consistently increased from the 1980s to 2000s.
With reference to the passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Adapting large-scale cultivation of commercial crops and viable corporate farming.
II. Providing free insurance for all crops and heavily subsidizing seeds, fertilizers, electricity and farm machinery at par with developed countries.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
I only
Understanding Agricultural Growth Stagnation
The passage discusses the performance of the agricultural sector in independent India, noting its failure to achieve a high-growth phase comparable to the non-agricultural economy. Specifically, it mentions that the highest decadal growth was only 3-5% in the 1980s, followed by relative stagnation.
We need to evaluate two assumptions based only on the information provided in this passage.
Analyzing Assumption I: Cultivation and Farming Structure
Assumption I states: “Adapting large-scale cultivation of commercial crops and viable corporate farming.”
The passage highlights the reality of low growth and stagnation in the agricultural sector. While the passage does not explicitly state that the lack of high growth is due to the absence of large-scale commercial cultivation or corporate farming, one could infer that to achieve a “high-growth phase,” structural changes or different farming models might be necessary. The assumption proposes specific changes (large-scale commercial crops, corporate farming) that are often associated with potentially higher productivity and growth compared to traditional, smaller-scale, or subsistence farming.
The passage describes a problem (low growth). Assumption I suggests possible approaches that might address this problem, implying that the current state (described in the passage as having low growth) is implicitly characterized by the limited adoption of such approaches. Therefore, in the context of discussing how to move from a state of low growth/stagnation to high growth, one might assume that adopting these methods is a path being considered or is necessary. Thus, this assumption can be considered valid when referenced against the passage's description of the problem it implies a potential solution or a contributing factor by its absence.
Analyzing Assumption II: Insurance and Subsidies
Assumption II states: “Providing free insurance for all crops and heavily subsidizing seeds, fertilizers, electricity and farm machinery at par with developed countries.”
This assumption lists specific policy interventions and inputs aimed at supporting agriculture. The passage, however, focuses solely on the historical growth rates and stagnation of the agricultural sector. It does not provide any information about:
- The existing levels of insurance coverage for crops.
- The extent of subsidies on inputs like seeds, fertilizers, electricity, or farm machinery.
- Comparisons of India's agricultural support levels with those of developed countries.
Since the passage does not mention any of these factors or policies, there is no basis within the text to validate or invalidate Assumption II. This assumption introduces external information (specific policies and subsidies) that is not discussed or implied by the passage's content about growth statistics.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis:
- Assumption I can be seen as related to potential strategies for overcoming the low growth and stagnation highlighted in the passage, implying that such methods are either lacking or necessary for higher growth.
- Assumption II introduces policy details and comparisons not mentioned or implied by the passage's focus on growth rates.
Therefore, with reference to the passage, only Assumption I is considered valid as it relates to potential structural factors influencing the growth discussed in the passage, whereas Assumption II discusses specific external policies not covered by the text.
Revision Table: Agricultural Sector Growth
| Concept | Details from Passage | Relevance to Assumptions |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural Growth in India | Never experienced a high-growth phase like the non-agricultural economy. | Context for both assumptions; they propose ways to address this low growth. |
| Highest Decadal Growth | 3-5% in the 1980s (CAGR). | Quantifies the limited high growth period. |
| Growth Trend Post-1980s | Suffered relative stagnation thereafter. | Highlights the persistent problem of low growth. |
| Non-agricultural Growth | Consistently increased from the 1980s to 2000s. | Provides a contrast to agricultural performance. |
Additional Information: Agricultural Sector Challenges
Understanding the challenges in the agricultural sector involves looking beyond just growth rates. Several factors contribute to the performance of this sector:
- Fragmentation of Land Holdings: Small farm sizes can hinder mechanization and scaling up operations.
- Dependency on Monsoons: A significant portion of agriculture relies on rainfall, making it vulnerable to climate variations.
- Lack of Infrastructure: Inadequate storage, transportation, and processing facilities can lead to post-harvest losses.
- Access to Credit and Markets: Farmers may face difficulties in accessing affordable credit and getting fair prices for their produce.
- Input Costs: Prices of seeds, fertilizers, and pesticides can impact profitability.
- Technological Adoption: Uneven adoption of modern farming techniques and technology.
- Policy Support: Government policies related to pricing, procurement, subsidies, and insurance play a crucial role.
The passage focuses specifically on the growth outcome, which is influenced by a combination of these underlying factors. Assumptions like the ones presented in the question often touch upon proposed solutions or perceived deficiencies related to these challenges.
Similar Questions
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
How many possible values of (p + q + r) are there satisfying 1/p + 1/q + 1/r = 1, where p, q and r are natural numbers (not necessarily distinct)?
What comes at X and Y respectively in the following sequence?
January, January, December, October, X, March, October, Y, SeptemberTeam X scored a total of N runs in 20 overs. Team Y tied the score in 10% less overs. Had Team Y’s average run rate (runs per over) been 50% higher, the scores would have been tied in 12 overs. How many runs were scored by Team X?
The price (p) of a commodity is first increased by k%; then decreased by k%; again increased by k%; and again decreased by k%. If the new price is q, then what is the relation between p and q?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and pragmatic message conveyed by the author of the passage?
Important Questions from Miscellaneous Topics
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
