Read the following passage and answer the items that follow the passage. Your answers to these items should be based on the passage only. Passage-1 Each State in India faces a distinctive set of challenges regarding the impact of warming, but also offers its own set of opportunities for reducing emissions depending on its natural resources. For example, coastal States need to take action to protect their shores from sea level rise, districts that are drier need to prepare for variable monsoon precipitation. Himalayan regions have their own unique challenges, and selected parts of peninsular India and offshore areas offer great opportunities for harnessing wind power. These various aspects need to be considered for developing clear and sustainable goals for the future.
Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and pragmatic message conveyed by the author of the passage?
India needs to formulate effective climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies at the State/region level.
The passage discusses the varied challenges and opportunities related to climate change impact and emission reduction across different States in India. It highlights the geographical diversity and its influence on specific needs and potential solutions.
The author provides examples of how different regions face distinct challenges:
The passage concludes by stating that "These various aspects need to be considered for developing clear and sustainable goals for the future." This strongly suggests that a one-size-fits-all approach is not suitable and that strategies must be tailored to the specific conditions of each State or region.
Let's examine each option in light of the passage:
| Option | Analysis based on Passage |
|---|---|
| 1. The mitigation and adaptation strategies to address/tackle the climate change is essentially the responsibility of each State. | The passage focuses on the *need* for state/region-specific strategies based on diverse conditions and opportunities. While this implies state involvement, it doesn't explicitly state that the *entire* responsibility lies *essentially* with each State alone. The passage is more about the *formulation* of strategies considering state specifics, rather than the ultimate responsibility structure. |
| 2. India is too diverse to implement any effective strategy or programme to address/tackle the climate change. | This contradicts the passage. The passage implies that effective strategies *can* be developed, but they need to take diversity into account ("various aspects need to be considered"). Diversity is presented as a factor requiring varied approaches, not an impediment to *any* effective strategy. |
| 3. It is basically the responsibility of the Union Government to implement the climate action plans and ensure net zero emissions. | The passage does not mention the Union Government's role or responsibility at all. Its focus is entirely on the variations across States and regions and the need to consider these specifics for future goals. |
| 4. India needs to formulate effective climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies at the State/region level. | This aligns perfectly with the passage. The passage emphasizes that each State faces a distinctive set of challenges and opportunities. The need to consider these "various aspects" for "sustainable goals" directly supports the idea that strategies must be formulated at the State/region level to be effective and appropriate for the local context. |
Based on the detailed analysis of the passage and the options, the most logical, rational, and pragmatic message conveyed by the author is the necessity of developing climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies that are specific to the conditions found at the State or regional level in India. This approach acknowledges India's diversity and tailors actions to local challenges and opportunities, which is the core point emphasized by the author.
| Concept | Description in Passage |
|---|---|
| State/Region Diversity | Each State faces a distinctive set of challenges and opportunities regarding warming impact and emission reduction. |
| Tailored Challenges | Coastal States have sea-level rise issues, drier districts have variable monsoon issues, Himalayan regions have unique challenges. |
| Tailored Opportunities | Selected parts like peninsular/offshore areas offer wind power opportunities. |
| Need for Consideration | These various aspects (State/region specifics) need to be considered. |
| Outcome | Considering specifics is needed for developing clear and sustainable goals (strategies). |
Climate change action generally involves two main pillars: mitigation and adaptation.
The passage implicitly highlights that effective climate action in a diverse country like India requires a combination of these approaches, specifically tailored to the local context, thus underscoring the importance of formulating strategies at the State/region level.
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
How many possible values of (p + q + r) are there satisfying 1/p + 1/q + 1/r = 1, where p, q and r are natural numbers (not necessarily distinct)?
What comes at X and Y respectively in the following sequence?
January, January, December, October, X, March, October, Y, September
Team X scored a total of N runs in 20 overs. Team Y tied the score in 10% less overs. Had Team Y’s average run rate (runs per over) been 50% higher, the scores would have been tied in 12 overs. How many runs were scored by Team X?
The price (p) of a commodity is first increased by k%; then decreased by k%; again increased by k%; and again decreased by k%. If the new price is q, then what is the relation between p and q?
With reference to the passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Green energy production can be linked to/integrated with the climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies.
II. Effects of climate change are much more severe in coastal and mountainous regions.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?