The petrol price shot up by 10% as a result of the hike in crude oil prices. The price of petrol before the hike was ₹90 per litre. A person travels 2200 km every month and his car gives a mileage of 16 km per litre. By how many km should he reduce his travel if he wants to maintain his expenditure at the previous level?
200 km
This problem asks us to figure out how much a person needs to reduce their monthly travel distance to keep their total petrol expenditure the same, after the price of petrol has increased. We are given the original price, the percentage increase, the monthly travel distance, and the car's mileage.
The original price of petrol was ₹90 per litre. It shot up by 10%. To find the new price, we add the increase amount to the original price.
Increase amount = 10% of ₹90
Increase amount = \( \frac{10}{100} \times 90 = \frac{1}{10} \times 90 = 9 \)
The increase in price is ₹9 per litre.
New Petrol Price = Original Price + Increase amount
New Petrol Price = ₹90 + ₹9 = ₹99 per litre.
The person travels 2200 km every month, and the car gives a mileage of 16 km per litre. To find out how many litres of petrol are consumed per month, we divide the total distance by the mileage.
Monthly Fuel Consumption = Total Distance / Mileage
Monthly Fuel Consumption = \( \frac{2200 \text{ km}}{16 \text{ km/litre}} \)
Let's perform the division:
So, the monthly fuel consumption is 137.5 litres.
Before the hike, the price was ₹90 per litre, and the person consumed 137.5 litres. The original monthly expenditure is the consumption multiplied by the original price.
Original Monthly Expenditure = Monthly Fuel Consumption \( \times \) Original Price
Original Monthly Expenditure = \( 137.5 \text{ litres} \times \text{₹}90/\text{litre} \)
Original Monthly Expenditure = \( 137.5 \times 90 \)
\( 137.5 \times 90 = (137 + 0.5) \times 90 = 137 \times 90 + 0.5 \times 90 \)
\( 137 \times 90 = 137 \times 9 \times 10 = (1233) \times 10 = 12330 \)
\( 0.5 \times 90 = \frac{1}{2} \times 90 = 45 \)
Original Monthly Expenditure = \( 12330 + 45 = 12375 \)
The original monthly expenditure on petrol was ₹12375.
The person wants to maintain the expenditure at the previous level, which is ₹12375. After the hike, the new petrol price is ₹99 per litre. To find out how many litres can be bought with ₹12375 at the new price, we divide the desired expenditure by the new price.
Maximum Fuel Consumption (at new price) = Original Monthly Expenditure / New Petrol Price
Maximum Fuel Consumption = \( \frac{₹12375}{₹99/\text{litre}} \)
\( \frac{12375}{99} \)
Both 12375 and 99 are divisible by 9 (sum of digits of 12375 is 18, sum of digits of 99 is 18).
\( 99 \div 9 = 11 \)
\( 12375 \div 9 = 1375 \)
So we have \( \frac{1375}{11} \).
Let's divide 1375 by 11:
Maximum Fuel Consumption = 125 litres.
With the new price, the person can afford 125 litres of petrol while maintaining the original expenditure. The car's mileage is still 16 km per litre. The maximum distance that can be travelled is the maximum fuel consumption multiplied by the mileage.
Maximum Travel Distance = Maximum Fuel Consumption \( \times \) Mileage
Maximum Travel Distance = \( 125 \text{ litres} \times 16 \text{ km/litre} \)
\( 125 \times 16 = 125 \times (10 + 6) = 125 \times 10 + 125 \times 6 \)
\( 125 \times 10 = 1250 \)
\( 125 \times 6 = 750 \)
Maximum Travel Distance = \( 1250 + 750 = 2000 \) km.
After the petrol price hike, the person can only travel 2000 km to maintain their original expenditure.
The original monthly travel distance was 2200 km. To maintain the expenditure, the new maximum travel distance is 2000 km. The reduction in travel distance is the difference between the original distance and the new maximum distance.
Reduction in Travel Distance = Original Monthly Distance - Maximum Travel Distance
Reduction in Travel Distance = \( 2200 \text{ km} - 2000 \text{ km} \)
Reduction in Travel Distance = 200 km.
The person should reduce his travel by 200 km every month to maintain his expenditure at the previous level.
| Description | Value | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Original Petrol Price | ₹90/litre | Given |
| Petrol Price Hike | 10% | Given |
| New Petrol Price | ₹99/litre | \( 90 \times (1 + 0.10) \) |
| Monthly Travel Distance | 2200 km | Given |
| Car Mileage | 16 km/litre | Given |
| Monthly Fuel Consumption (Original) | 137.5 litres | \( 2200 / 16 \) |
| Original Monthly Expenditure | ₹12375 | \( 137.5 \times 90 \) |
| Max Fuel for Original Expenditure (New Price) | 125 litres | \( 12375 / 99 \) |
| Max Travel Distance (New Price) | 2000 km | \( 125 \times 16 \) |
| Reduction in Travel Distance | 200 km | \( 2200 - 2000 \) |
This problem demonstrates a common real-life scenario where rising costs impact household budgets. When the price of a commodity like petrol increases, individuals or families have a few options to manage their expenditure:
Understanding concepts like percentage increase, calculating costs based on quantity and price, and working with mileage helps in managing personal finances effectively in the face of price fluctuations.
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
How many possible values of (p + q + r) are there satisfying 1/p + 1/q + 1/r = 1, where p, q and r are natural numbers (not necessarily distinct)?
What comes at X and Y respectively in the following sequence?
January, January, December, October, X, March, October, Y, September
Team X scored a total of N runs in 20 overs. Team Y tied the score in 10% less overs. Had Team Y’s average run rate (runs per over) been 50% higher, the scores would have been tied in 12 overs. How many runs were scored by Team X?
The price (p) of a commodity is first increased by k%; then decreased by k%; again increased by k%; and again decreased by k%. If the new price is q, then what is the relation between p and q?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and pragmatic message conveyed by the author of the passage?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?