How many possible values of (p + q + r) are there satisfying 1/p + 1/q + 1/r = 1, where p, q and r are natural numbers (not necessarily distinct)?
Three
The question asks for the number of distinct possible values for the sum \((p + q + r)\), where p, q, and r are natural numbers that satisfy the equation \(1/p + 1/q + 1/r = 1\). Natural numbers are positive integers (1, 2, 3, ...).
We are looking for positive integer solutions \((p, q, r)\) to the equation \( \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{r} = 1 \). These kinds of equations are sometimes referred to as Diophantine equations involving unit fractions.
Since p, q, and r are natural numbers, they must be greater than or equal to 1. The terms \(1/p\), \(1/q\), and \(1/r\) are all positive.
Let's assume without loss of generality that \( p \le q \le r \). This ordering helps us systematically find all unique sets of values for \((p, q, r)\). Once we find these sets, we can find their sums \((p+q+r)\) and count the number of distinct sum values.
Since \( p \le q \le r \), we have \( \frac{1}{p} \ge \frac{1}{q} \ge \frac{1}{r} \). Using this in the equation:
\( 1 = \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{r} \le \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{p} = \frac{3}{p} \)
This inequality \( 1 \le \frac{3}{p} \) implies \( p \le 3 \). So, p can only be 1, 2, or 3.
However, if \( p = 1 \), the equation becomes \( \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{r} = 1 \), which simplifies to \( 1 + \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{r} = 1 \). This gives \( \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{r} = 0 \). Since q and r are natural numbers, \(1/q\) and \(1/r\) are positive, so their sum cannot be 0. Therefore, p cannot be 1.
Thus, the only possible values for p (under the assumption \( p \le q \le r \)) are 2 and 3.
If \( p = 2 \), the equation becomes \( \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{r} = 1 \). Subtracting \(1/2\) from both sides, we get \( \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{r} = 1 - \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{2} \).
Now, considering \( p \le q \le r \), we have \( 2 \le q \le r \).
Using \( \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{r} = \frac{1}{2} \) and \( q \le r \), we have \( \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{r} \le \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{q} = \frac{2}{q} \).
This inequality \( \frac{1}{2} \le \frac{2}{q} \) implies \( q \le 4 \). So, the possible values for q when \( p = 2 \) and \( q \ge p \) are 2, 3, or 4.
So, for \( p=2 \), the unique ordered solutions with \( p \le q \le r \) are \((2, 3, 6)\) and \((2, 4, 4)\).
If \( p = 3 \), the equation becomes \( \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{r} = 1 \). Subtracting \(1/3\) from both sides, we get \( \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{r} = 1 - \frac{1}{3} = \frac{2}{3} \).
Now, considering \( p \le q \le r \), we have \( 3 \le q \le r \).
Using \( \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{r} = \frac{2}{3} \) and \( q \le r \), we have \( \frac{2}{3} = \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{r} \le \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{q} = \frac{2}{q} \).
This inequality \( \frac{2}{3} \le \frac{2}{q} \) implies \( q \le 3 \). So, the only possible value for q when \( p = 3 \) and \( q \ge p \) is 3.
So, for \( p=3 \), the unique ordered solution with \( p \le q \le r \) is \((3, 3, 3)\).
As shown earlier, the inequality \( p \le 3 \) must hold for natural number solutions. Therefore, there are no solutions where \( p > 3 \).
The unique sets of natural numbers \((p, q, r)\) satisfying \( \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{r} = 1 \) (when ordered \( p \le q \le r \)) are:
Any permutation of these sets will also satisfy the original equation, but they will result in the same sum \(p+q+r\).
Now we calculate the sum \( p + q + r \) for each of the unique sets:
The possible values for \((p + q + r)\) are 9, 10, and 11.
There are 3 distinct possible values for \((p + q + r)\).
| Unique Solution (p, q, r) with \(p \le q \le r\) | Sum (p + q + r) |
|---|---|
| (2, 3, 6) | 11 |
| (2, 4, 4) | 10 |
| (3, 3, 3) | 9 |
The set of possible sum values is \{9, 10, 11\}. The number of possible values is the number of elements in this set.
Number of possible values = 3.
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 | Understand the equation \(1/p + 1/q + 1/r = 1\) and the constraint that p, q, r are natural numbers. |
| 2 | Assume \(p \le q \le r\) to simplify finding unique combinations. |
| 3 | Establish bounds for the smallest variable, p, using inequalities. Found p can only be 2 or 3. |
| 4 | Analyze Case p = 2: Solve \(1/q + 1/r = 1/2\), finding bounds for q and possible values for q and r. Found solutions (2, 3, 6) and (2, 4, 4). |
| 5 | Analyze Case p = 3: Solve \(1/q + 1/r = 2/3\), finding bounds for q and possible values for q and r. Found solution (3, 3, 3). |
| 6 | Confirm no solutions exist for p > 3. |
| 7 | List the unique (p, q, r) combinations found: (2, 3, 6), (2, 4, 4), (3, 3, 3). |
| 8 | Calculate the sum \(p+q+r\) for each unique combination. |
| 9 | Count the number of distinct values obtained for the sum. |
The equation \( \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{r} = 1 \) is a specific example of an equation involving unit fractions (fractions with a numerator of 1). This type of equation appears in number theory.
Finding integer solutions to equations involving sums of unit fractions is related to covering systems and Egyptian fractions.
A famous unsolved problem related to unit fractions is the Erdos-Straus Conjecture, which states that for all integers \(n \ge 2\), the equation \( \frac{4}{n} = \frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{y} + \frac{1}{z} \) has positive integer solutions for x, y, and z. Our problem is a simpler case where the sum equals 1.
Our systematic approach using the ordered assumption \(p \le q \le r\) is a standard method for finding all integer solutions to such equations where the number of terms is fixed and the sum is positive.
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
What comes at X and Y respectively in the following sequence?
January, January, December, October, X, March, October, Y, September
Team X scored a total of N runs in 20 overs. Team Y tied the score in 10% less overs. Had Team Y’s average run rate (runs per over) been 50% higher, the scores would have been tied in 12 overs. How many runs were scored by Team X?
The price (p) of a commodity is first increased by k%; then decreased by k%; again increased by k%; and again decreased by k%. If the new price is q, then what is the relation between p and q?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and pragmatic message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Green energy production can be linked to/integrated with the climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies.
II. Effects of climate change are much more severe in coastal and mountainous regions.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?