The price (p) of a commodity is first increased by k%; then decreased by k%; again increased by k%; and again decreased by k%. If the new price is q, then what is the relation between p and q?
p(10⁴ - k²)² = q × 10⁸
This problem involves a commodity's price undergoing a series of percentage changes: an increase, followed by a decrease, another increase, and finally another decrease, all by the same percentage k%. We need to find the relationship between the initial price (p) and the final price (q) after these four changes.
Let the initial price be $p$.
When a price is increased by k%, the new price is the original price plus k% of the original price. Mathematically, this is $p + p \times \frac{k}{100} = p \left(1 + \frac{k}{100}\right)$.
When a price is decreased by k%, the new price is the original price minus k% of the original price. Mathematically, this is $p - p \times \frac{k}{100} = p \left(1 - \frac{k}{100}\right)$.
Let's track the price after each step:
The final price $q$ is $p_4$. So, we have:
\(q = p \left(1 + \frac{k}{100}\right) \left(1 - \frac{k}{100}\right) \left(1 + \frac{k}{100}\right) \left(1 - \frac{k}{100}\right)\)
We can group the terms:
\(q = p \left[\left(1 + \frac{k}{100}\right) \left(1 - \frac{k}{100}\right)\right] \left[\left(1 + \frac{k}{100}\right) \left(1 - \frac{k}{100}\right)\right]\)
Using the algebraic identity \((a+b)(a-b) = a^2 - b^2\), let $a=1$ and $b=\frac{k}{100}$.
\(1 + \frac{k}{100}\) and \(1 - \frac{k}{100}\) terms become \(1^2 - \left(\frac{k}{100}\right)^2 = 1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\).
So, the equation simplifies to:
\(q = p \left[1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right] \left[1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right]\)
\(q = p \left[1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right]^2\)
To match the format of the options, let's find a common denominator inside the bracket:
\(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000} = \frac{10000}{10000} - \frac{k^2}{10000} = \frac{10000 - k^2}{10000}\)
Substitute this back into the equation for q:
\(q = p \left[\frac{10000 - k^2}{10000}\right]^2\)
Using the rule \(\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^2 = \frac{a^2}{b^2}\):
\(q = p \frac{(10000 - k^2)^2}{10000^2}\)
We know that \(10000 = 10^4\), so \(10000^2 = (10^4)^2 = 10^8\).
So, the equation becomes:
\(q = p \frac{(10^4 - k^2)^2}{10^8}\)
To isolate p and q, we can multiply both sides by \(10^8\):
\(q \times 10^8 = p (10^4 - k^2)^2\)
Or, rearranging to match the options format:
\(p (10^4 - k^2)^2 = q \times 10^8\)
Let's compare this derived relationship with the given options to find the correct one.
We found the relation: \(p(10^4 - k^2)^2 = q \times 10^8\)
| Option | Relation | Matches Derived Relation? |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | \(p(10^4 - k^2)^2 = q \times 10^8\) | Yes |
| 2 | \(p(10^4 - k^2)^2 = q \times 10^4\) | No |
| 3 | \(p(10^4 - k^2) = q \times 10^4\) | No |
| 4 | \(p(10^4 - k^2) = q \times 10^8\) | No |
The derived relationship matches Option 1 exactly.
| Concept | Explanation | Mathematical Representation |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Increase | Adding a percentage of the original value. | Initial Value \(\times (1 + \frac{\text{k}}{100})\) |
| Percentage Decrease | Subtracting a percentage of the original value. | Initial Value \(\times (1 - \frac{\text{k}}{100})\) |
| Successive Changes | Applying multiple percentage changes one after another on the new value each time. | Multiply the original value by the change factors sequentially. |
| Difference of Squares | A fundamental algebraic identity useful for simplification. | \((a+b)(a-b) = a^2 - b^2\) |
When an initial value is changed by +a% and then by -b%, the net percentage change is given by \(\left(a - b - \frac{ab}{100}\right)\)%. This problem involves k% increase and k% decrease happening twice.
For the first increase (+k%) and first decrease (-k%), the net change on p results in a price \(p \left(1 + \frac{k}{100}\right) \left(1 - \frac{k}{100}\right) = p \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right)\). This is a net decrease because \(\frac{k^2}{10000}\) is positive (assuming \(k \neq 0\)). The net percentage change is \(-\frac{k^2}{100}\)%. The price becomes \(p \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{100} \times \frac{1}{100}\right)\) which is \(p \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right)\).
The question involves this sequence of (+k%, -k%) applied twice. So, the price after the first pair of changes is \(p' = p \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right)\). The second pair of changes (+k%, -k%) is applied to this new price \(p'\). The final price \(q\) will be \(q = p' \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right)\).
Substituting \(p'\):
\(q = p \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right) \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right) = p \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right)^2\)
This confirms the result obtained through step-by-step calculation and further simplification:
\(q = p \left(\frac{10000 - k^2}{10000}\right)^2 = p \frac{(10000 - k^2)^2}{10000^2} = p \frac{(10^4 - k^2)^2}{10^8}\)
\(q \times 10^8 = p (10^4 - k^2)^2\)
Or, \(p (10^4 - k^2)^2 = q \times 10^8\).
Understanding successive percentage changes is crucial for solving problems involving repeated increases and decreases applied to a value.
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
How many possible values of (p + q + r) are there satisfying 1/p + 1/q + 1/r = 1, where p, q and r are natural numbers (not necessarily distinct)?
What comes at X and Y respectively in the following sequence?
January, January, December, October, X, March, October, Y, September
Team X scored a total of N runs in 20 overs. Team Y tied the score in 10% less overs. Had Team Y’s average run rate (runs per over) been 50% higher, the scores would have been tied in 12 overs. How many runs were scored by Team X?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and pragmatic message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Green energy production can be linked to/integrated with the climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies.
II. Effects of climate change are much more severe in coastal and mountainous regions.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?