The price (p) of a commodity is first increased by k%; then decreased by k%; again increased by k%; and again decreased by k%. If the new price is q, then what is the relation between p and q?
p(10⁴ - k²)² = q × 10⁸
This problem involves a commodity's price undergoing a series of percentage changes: an increase, followed by a decrease, another increase, and finally another decrease, all by the same percentage k%. We need to find the relationship between the initial price (p) and the final price (q) after these four changes.
Let the initial price be $p$.
When a price is increased by k%, the new price is the original price plus k% of the original price. Mathematically, this is $p + p \times \frac{k}{100} = p \left(1 + \frac{k}{100}\right)$.
When a price is decreased by k%, the new price is the original price minus k% of the original price. Mathematically, this is $p - p \times \frac{k}{100} = p \left(1 - \frac{k}{100}\right)$.
Let's track the price after each step:
The final price $q$ is $p_4$. So, we have:
\(q = p \left(1 + \frac{k}{100}\right) \left(1 - \frac{k}{100}\right) \left(1 + \frac{k}{100}\right) \left(1 - \frac{k}{100}\right)\)
We can group the terms:
\(q = p \left[\left(1 + \frac{k}{100}\right) \left(1 - \frac{k}{100}\right)\right] \left[\left(1 + \frac{k}{100}\right) \left(1 - \frac{k}{100}\right)\right]\)
Using the algebraic identity \((a+b)(a-b) = a^2 - b^2\), let $a=1$ and $b=\frac{k}{100}$.
\(1 + \frac{k}{100}\) and \(1 - \frac{k}{100}\) terms become \(1^2 - \left(\frac{k}{100}\right)^2 = 1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\).
So, the equation simplifies to:
\(q = p \left[1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right] \left[1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right]\)
\(q = p \left[1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right]^2\)
To match the format of the options, let's find a common denominator inside the bracket:
\(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000} = \frac{10000}{10000} - \frac{k^2}{10000} = \frac{10000 - k^2}{10000}\)
Substitute this back into the equation for q:
\(q = p \left[\frac{10000 - k^2}{10000}\right]^2\)
Using the rule \(\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^2 = \frac{a^2}{b^2}\):
\(q = p \frac{(10000 - k^2)^2}{10000^2}\)
We know that \(10000 = 10^4\), so \(10000^2 = (10^4)^2 = 10^8\).
So, the equation becomes:
\(q = p \frac{(10^4 - k^2)^2}{10^8}\)
To isolate p and q, we can multiply both sides by \(10^8\):
\(q \times 10^8 = p (10^4 - k^2)^2\)
Or, rearranging to match the options format:
\(p (10^4 - k^2)^2 = q \times 10^8\)
Let's compare this derived relationship with the given options to find the correct one.
We found the relation: \(p(10^4 - k^2)^2 = q \times 10^8\)
| Option | Relation | Matches Derived Relation? |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | \(p(10^4 - k^2)^2 = q \times 10^8\) | Yes |
| 2 | \(p(10^4 - k^2)^2 = q \times 10^4\) | No |
| 3 | \(p(10^4 - k^2) = q \times 10^4\) | No |
| 4 | \(p(10^4 - k^2) = q \times 10^8\) | No |
The derived relationship matches Option 1 exactly.
| Concept | Explanation | Mathematical Representation |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Increase | Adding a percentage of the original value. | Initial Value \(\times (1 + \frac{\text{k}}{100})\) |
| Percentage Decrease | Subtracting a percentage of the original value. | Initial Value \(\times (1 - \frac{\text{k}}{100})\) |
| Successive Changes | Applying multiple percentage changes one after another on the new value each time. | Multiply the original value by the change factors sequentially. |
| Difference of Squares | A fundamental algebraic identity useful for simplification. | \((a+b)(a-b) = a^2 - b^2\) |
When an initial value is changed by +a% and then by -b%, the net percentage change is given by \(\left(a - b - \frac{ab}{100}\right)\)%. This problem involves k% increase and k% decrease happening twice.
For the first increase (+k%) and first decrease (-k%), the net change on p results in a price \(p \left(1 + \frac{k}{100}\right) \left(1 - \frac{k}{100}\right) = p \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right)\). This is a net decrease because \(\frac{k^2}{10000}\) is positive (assuming \(k \neq 0\)). The net percentage change is \(-\frac{k^2}{100}\)%. The price becomes \(p \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{100} \times \frac{1}{100}\right)\) which is \(p \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right)\).
The question involves this sequence of (+k%, -k%) applied twice. So, the price after the first pair of changes is \(p' = p \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right)\). The second pair of changes (+k%, -k%) is applied to this new price \(p'\). The final price \(q\) will be \(q = p' \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right)\).
Substituting \(p'\):
\(q = p \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right) \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right) = p \left(1 - \frac{k^2}{10000}\right)^2\)
This confirms the result obtained through step-by-step calculation and further simplification:
\(q = p \left(\frac{10000 - k^2}{10000}\right)^2 = p \frac{(10000 - k^2)^2}{10000^2} = p \frac{(10^4 - k^2)^2}{10^8}\)
\(q \times 10^8 = p (10^4 - k^2)^2\)
Or, \(p (10^4 - k^2)^2 = q \times 10^8\).
Understanding successive percentage changes is crucial for solving problems involving repeated increases and decreases applied to a value.
A natural number N is such that it can be expressed as N = p + q + r, where p, q and r are distinct factors of N. How many numbers below 50 have this property?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and pragmatic message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Green energy production can be linked to/integrated with the climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies.
II. Effects of climate change are much more severe in coastal and mountainous regions.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. People above the poverty line also are prone to suffer from anxiety about economic insecurity.
II. Eradication of poverty can result in peace and social equality in the country.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
A solid cube is painted yellow on all its faces. The cube is then cut into 60 smaller but equal pieces by making the minimum number of cuts. Which of the following statements is/are correct?
I. The minimum number of cuts is 9.
II. The number of smaller pieces which are not painted on any face is 6.
If 7 *24 = 25 and 12 *16 = 20, then what is 16 * 63 equal to?
The petrol price shot up by 10% as a result of the hike in crude oil prices. The price of petrol before the hike was ₹90 per litre. A person travels 2200 km every month and his car gives a mileage of 16 km per litre. By how many km should he reduce his travel if he wants to maintain his expenditure at the previous level?
A 4-digit number N is such that when divided by 3, 5, 6, 9 leaves a remainder 1, 3, 4, 7 respectively. What is the smallest value of N?
A natural number N is such that it can be expressed as N = p + q + r, where p, q and r are distinct factors of N. How many numbers below 50 have this property?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and pragmatic message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Green energy production can be linked to/integrated with the climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies.
II. Effects of climate change are much more severe in coastal and mountainous regions.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the passage?