Which one of the following statements with regard to the ryotwari settlement is not correct?
In principle, it strengthened the former elite, the zamindars and weakened the peasantry.
Understanding the Ryotwari Settlement in British India
The question asks us to identify the statement that is *not* correct regarding the Ryotwari settlement. Let's examine each statement in detail to understand the characteristics of this land revenue system introduced by the British.
Analysing Statements about Ryotwari Settlement
- Statement 1: In southern and western India, the ryotwari settlement was adopted.
This statement is correct. The Ryotwari system was primarily introduced in the Madras Presidency, Bombay Presidency, and certain parts of Assam and Coorg. These regions fall within southern and western India. Thomas Munro was a key figure in its implementation in the Madras Presidency. - Statement 2: Ryotwari was in principle a direct contract between the ryot and the state.
This statement is correct. A defining feature of the Ryotwari system was that the British government dealt directly with the individual cultivators, known as 'ryots'. The state collected land revenue directly from the ryots, bypassing intermediaries like zamindars who were prominent in other systems like the Permanent Settlement. This created a direct contractual relationship. - Statement 3: It means a tax contract valid for usually 30 years.
This statement is generally correct. Under the Ryotwari system, the land revenue rates were not fixed permanently. Periodic settlements were conducted, typically every 20 to 30 years, to revise the revenue demand based on factors like soil type, crop yield, and market prices. So, the tax contract was indeed valid for a specific period, often around 30 years. - Statement 4: In principle, it strengthened the former elite, the zamindars and weakened the peasantry.
This statement is incorrect. The core principle of the Ryotwari system was to eliminate intermediaries and deal directly with the ryot. While the system had its flaws and often led to high revenue demands that distressed the peasantry, its *principle* was not to strengthen the zamindars. In areas where Ryotwari was introduced, the role of zamindars as land revenue collectors was either significantly reduced or eliminated. The system aimed to recognise the ryot as the owner or holder of the land, from whom revenue was directly collected. Therefore, it did not strengthen the zamindars; in fact, it often weakened their position compared to systems like the Permanent Settlement. While the high revenue demands under Ryotwari often weakened the peasantry economically, the statement incorrectly asserts that it strengthened the zamindars.
Conclusion on the Ryotwari Settlement
Based on the analysis, the statement that is *not* correct about the Ryotwari settlement is the one claiming it strengthened the zamindars. The system's design was inherently anti-zamindar, favouring a direct relationship with the cultivators.
Revision Table: Comparing Land Revenue Systems (Ryotwari vs. Zamindari)
| Feature | Ryotwari Settlement | Permanent Settlement (Zamindari) |
|---|---|---|
| Parties Involved | State and individual Ryot (cultivator) | State and Zamindar (landlord/intermediary) |
| Area of Implementation | Madras, Bombay, parts of Assam, Coorg | Bengal, Bihar, Odisha, parts of Varanasi |
| Revenue Fixation | Periodically revised (e.g., every 20-30 years) | Fixed permanently |
| Position of Cultivator | Recognised as owner/holder of land, pays directly | Tenant of the Zamindar, pays rent to Zamindar |
| Intermediaries | Bypassed | Zamindars acted as intermediaries |
Additional Information on Ryotwari Settlement
Introduced partly due to the failure of the Permanent Settlement in generating predictable long-term revenue and partly based on the belief that it would be more just to deal directly with the actual cultivators, the Ryotwari system had significant impacts:
- It aimed to secure the rights of the cultivators by recognizing them as proprietors.
- However, the revenue rates were often set very high, leading to indebtedness and land alienation among the ryots.
- The state became a direct landlord, which meant it took on the responsibilities and risks associated with land management and revenue collection directly.
- Periodic revisions of revenue often led to uncertainty and exploitation.
Despite the intention to empower the peasantry, the high demands and rigidity of collection under Ryotwari often led to hardship, forcing many ryots to borrow from moneylenders, leading to loss of land.
Similar Questions
Which one of the following wasnotincluded in the terms and conditions of Subsidiary Alliance System of Lord Wellesley?
Consider the following statements about the initial development of railways in India by the British:
1. Private financial investors for railways would get land free from the British Government in India.
2. The investors would get a return of 5 percent on their capital from the government if they ran at a loss or secured inadequate profit.
3. The railways would be jointly managed with the government.
How many of the above statements is/are correct?
Which of the following industries was most affected by the 'de-industrialisation' of India in the 19th century?
The Ryotwari experiment in land revenue was started by
The Bengal Famine of 1769 - 70 was worsened by
When was the monopoly of China trade lost by East India Company ?
The British policy towards Afghanistan in the first half of the 19 th century aimed at
Consider the following statements about the treaty of Allahabad (1765):
1. It was an agreement between the Mughal emperor Shah Alam II and the English East India Company
2. It made the English East India Company the Diwan of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa
3. As per the provisions of the treaty, the East India Company was granted Diwani in exchange for an annual tribute to Mughal Emperor
4. The treaty was worked out after the defeat of the Mughal emperor in the battle of Buxar
How many of the above statements is/are correct?
Important Questions from India under East India Company’s Rule
Which of the Governor Generals adopted the policy of Subsidiary Alliance with Indian States ?
Consider the following statements :
1. St. Francis Xavier was one of the founding members of the Jesuit Order.
2. St. Francis Xavier died in Goa and a church is dedicated to him there.
3. The Feast of St. Francis Xavier is celebrated in Goa each year.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
In which year was there a furore over the attempt by the government to introduce the Ilbert Bill by the white opposition that forced the government to withdraw the bill?
Name the treaty signed in 1826 at the end of the First Anglo-Burmese War. This treaty sealed the victory of the British powers.
The name of Holt Mackenzie is associated with which land settlement policy?
