This question asks to identify the statement that is factually incorrect regarding the Lokayukta's authority and scope.
The options provided describe potential functions and limitations of the Lokayukta:
The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, established the Lokpal at the central level, while Lokayuktas operate at the state level. The Lokpal has jurisdiction that extends to the Prime Minister, subject to specific conditions.
Specifically, the Lokpal can initiate inquiries into allegations against the Prime Minister concerning corruption or abuse of power. Certain procedures and exclusions apply, such as matters related to national security. Therefore, the absolute statement in Option 4, implying a complete inability of the ombudsman (potentially referring to the Lokpal framework) to question the Prime Minister, is inaccurate.
As the question seeks the statement that is not true, Option 4 is identified as the correct answer because it presents a limitation that does not fully hold true under the Lokpal's jurisdiction.
Which among the following is not a Statutory Body/Constitutional Body?
In which year the Rashtriya Mahila Aayog was founded?
Which of the following is not a constitutional body?
What is the tenure of the Chairperson of National Human Rights Commission?
IBBI stands for 'Insolvency and Bankruptcy _______ of India'.