What is the maximum value of n such that
7 × 343 × 385 × 1000 × 2401 × 77777
is divisible by 35n?
4
The question asks for the maximum integer value of \(n\) such that the product \(7 \times 343 \times 385 \times 1000 \times 2401 \times 77777\) is completely divisible by \(35^n\). To solve this divisibility problem, we need to use the concept of prime factorization. The divisor is \(35^n\). We know that \(35 = 5 \times 7\). Therefore, \(35^n = (5 \times 7)^n = 5^n \times 7^n\). For a number to be divisible by \(5^n \times 7^n\), its prime factorization must contain at least \(n\) factors of 5 and at least \(n\) factors of 7.
Let's find the prime factorization of each number in the given product:
Now, let's write the prime factorization of the entire product by combining the factors we found:
Product \( = (7^1) \times (7^3) \times (5^1 \times 7^1 \times 11^1) \times (2^3 \times 5^3) \times (7^4) \times (7^1 \times 41^1 \times 271^1)\)
To find the total power of each prime factor in the product, we add the exponents for each base:
The prime factorization of the product is \(2^3 \times 5^4 \times 7^{10} \times 11^1 \times 41^1 \times 271^1\).
For the product to be divisible by \(35^n = 5^n \times 7^n\), the number of factors of 5 in the product must be at least \(n\), and the number of factors of 7 in the product must be at least \(n\).
From the prime factorization of the product, we have:
For the product to be divisible by \(35^n\), both conditions must be satisfied simultaneously. Therefore, \(n\) must be less than or equal to the minimum of 4 and 10.
\(n \le \min(4, 10)\)
\(n \le 4\)
The maximum possible integer value for \(n\) that satisfies this condition is 4.
The maximum value of \(n\) is 4.
| Number | Prime Factorization |
|---|---|
| 7 | \(7^1\) |
| 343 | \(7^3\) |
| 385 | \(5^1 \times 7^1 \times 11^1\) |
| 1000 | \(2^3 \times 5^3\) |
| 2401 | \(7^4\) |
| 77777 | \(7^1 \times 41^1 \times 271^1\) |
| Prime Factor | Total Power in Product |
|---|---|
| 5 | \(1 + 3 = 4\) |
| 7 | \(1 + 3 + 1 + 4 + 1 = 10\) |
| Concept | Explanation | Relevance Here |
|---|---|---|
| Prime Factorization | Breaking down a composite number into its prime number components multiplied together. | Essential for understanding the factors available in the product and required by the divisor \(35^n\). |
| Divisibility Rules | Shortcuts to determine if a number is divisible by another number without performing division. | Useful for starting the factorization (e.g., divisibility by 5, 7, 11). |
| Exponents (Powers) | Represent repeated multiplication of a base number. | Used to express the total count of each prime factor in the product and the divisor \(35^n\). |
| Divisibility by \(a^n\) | A number is divisible by \(a^n\) if its prime factorization contains the prime factors of \(a\) raised to at least the power of \(n\). | Applied directly to check if the product is divisible by \(5^n\) and \(7^n\). |
A related concept in number theory involves finding the highest power of a prime number \(p\) that divides a factorial \(n!\). This is given by Legendre's formula:
\(E_p(n!) = \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \lfloor \frac{n}{p^i} \rfloor = \lfloor \frac{n}{p} \rfloor + \lfloor \frac{n}{p^2} \rfloor + \lfloor \frac{n}{p^3} \rfloor + \dots\)
Where \(\lfloor x \rfloor\) is the floor function, giving the greatest integer less than or equal to \(x\).
While this specific formula wasn't directly used in solving the current problem, understanding how prime factors accumulate in products (like factorials) is a fundamental skill for these types of divisibility questions. The core idea remains the same: break down numbers into their prime factors and count the total occurrences of the relevant primes.
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
How many possible values of (p + q + r) are there satisfying 1/p + 1/q + 1/r = 1, where p, q and r are natural numbers (not necessarily distinct)?
What comes at X and Y respectively in the following sequence?
January, January, December, October, X, March, October, Y, September
Team X scored a total of N runs in 20 overs. Team Y tied the score in 10% less overs. Had Team Y’s average run rate (runs per over) been 50% higher, the scores would have been tied in 12 overs. How many runs were scored by Team X?
The price (p) of a commodity is first increased by k%; then decreased by k%; again increased by k%; and again decreased by k%. If the new price is q, then what is the relation between p and q?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and pragmatic message conveyed by the author of the passage?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?