What is \(\mathop \smallint \nolimits_{{{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}}}^{{{\rm{e}}^2}} \left| {\frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}} \right|{\rm{dx}}\) equal to?
The problem asks us to evaluate the definite integral \(\mathop \smallint \nolimits_{{{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}}}^{{{\rm{e}}^2}} \left| {\frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}} \right|{\rm{dx}}\).
The integrand is \(\left| {\frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}} \right|\). To handle the absolute value, we need to determine the sign of the expression inside it, which is \(\frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}\), over the interval of integration \([{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}, {\rm{e}}^2]\).
For \({\rm{x}} \in [{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}, {\rm{e}}^2]\), \({\rm{x}}\) is always positive. Therefore, the sign of \(\frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}\) is determined by the sign of \(\ln {\rm{x}}\).
The interval of integration is \([{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}, {\rm{e}}^2]\). We note that \({\rm{e}}^{ - 1} \approx 0.368\), \(1\), and \({\rm{e}}^2 \approx 7.389\). The point \({\rm{x}}=1\) is within the interval \([{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}, {\rm{e}}^2]\) and is where \(\ln {\rm{x}}\) changes sign.
Thus, we must split the integral into two parts based on where \(\ln {\rm{x}}\) is negative and where it is positive:
The integral becomes:
\(\mathop \smallint \nolimits_{{{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}}}^{{{\rm{e}}^2}} \left| {\frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}} \right|{\rm{dx}} = \mathop \smallint \nolimits_{{{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}}}^1 \left( { - \frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}} \right){\rm{dx}} + \mathop \smallint \nolimits_1^{{{\rm{e}}^2}} \frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}{\rm{dx}}\)
Now, let's evaluate the indefinite integral \(\smallint \frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}{\rm{dx}}\). We can use a substitution method.
Let \({\rm{u}} = \ln {\rm{x}}\). Then, the differential \({\rm{du}} = \frac{1}{{\rm{x}}}{\rm{dx}}\).
The integral becomes \(\smallint {\rm{u}} \, {\rm{du}}\), which integrates to \(\frac{{{\rm{u}}^2}}{2} + {\rm{C}}\).
Substituting back \({\rm{u}} = \ln {\rm{x}}\), the indefinite integral is \(\frac{{{{(\ln {\rm{x}})}^2}}}{2} + {\rm{C}}\).
Now, we evaluate the definite integrals:
First Integral: \( - \mathop \smallint \nolimits_{{{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}}}^1 \frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}{\rm{dx}}\)
\( - \left[ {\frac{{{{(\ln {\rm{x}})}^2}}}{2}} \right]_{{{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}}}^1 = - \left( {\frac{{{{(\ln 1)}^2}}}{2} - \frac{{{{(\ln {{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}})}^2}}}{2}} \right)\)
We know that \(\ln 1 = 0\) and \(\ln {\rm{e}}^{ - 1} = -1\).
\( = - \left( {\frac{{0^2}}{2} - \frac{{{{( - 1)}^2}}}{2}} \right) = - \left( {0 - \frac{1}{2}} \right) = \frac{1}{2}\)
Second Integral: \( \mathop \smallint \nolimits_1^{{{\rm{e}}^2}} \frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}{\rm{dx}}\)
\( \left[ {\frac{{{{(\ln {\rm{x}})}^2}}}{2}} \right]_1^{{{\rm{e}}^2}} = \left( {\frac{{{{(\ln {{\rm{e}}^2})}^2}}}{2} - \frac{{{{(\ln 1)}^2}}}{2}} \right)\)
We know that \(\ln {\rm{e}}^2 = 2\) and \(\ln 1 = 0\).
\( = \left( {\frac{{{2^2}}}{2} - \frac{{0^2}}{2}} \right) = \left( {\frac{4}{2} - 0} \right) = 2\)
Finally, we sum the results of the two integrals:
\(\mathop \smallint \nolimits_{{{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}}}^{{{\rm{e}}^2}} \left| {\frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}} \right|{\rm{dx}} = \frac{1}{2} + 2 = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{4}{2} = \frac{5}{2}\)
The value of the definite integral is \(\frac{5}{2}\).
| Interval | Sign of \(\ln {\rm{x}}\) | \(|\frac{\ln {\rm{x}}}{{\rm{x}}}|\) | Integral | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| \([{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}, 1]\) | \(\le 0\) | \( - \frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}\) | \( - \mathop \smallint \nolimits_{{{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}}}^1 \frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}{\rm{dx}}\) | \(\frac{1}{2}\) |
| \([1, {\rm{e}}^2]\) | \(\ge 0\) | \(\frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}\) | \( \mathop \smallint \nolimits_1^{{{\rm{e}}^2}} \frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}{\rm{dx}}\) | \(2\) |
Adding the results from the intervals gives the total value:
\(\frac{1}{2} + 2 = \frac{5}{2}\).
| Concept | Description | Application in this problem |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute Value in Integrals | If the integrand contains an absolute value, split the integral into sub-intervals where the expression inside the absolute value has a constant sign. | Split \([{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}, {\rm{e}}^2]\) at \({\rm{x}}=1\) where \(\ln {\rm{x}}\) changes sign. |
| Substitution Method | Used to simplify integrals of composite functions by replacing a part of the integrand with a new variable. | Used \({\rm{u}} = \ln {\rm{x}}\) to integrate \(\frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}\). |
| Properties of Logarithms | \(\ln 1 = 0\), \(\ln {\rm{e}}^n = n\). | Used to evaluate \(\ln\) at the limits of integration \(1\), \({\rm{e}}^{ - 1}\), and \({\rm{e}}^2\). |
The integral of \(\frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}\) is a common type that is solved using substitution. The key observation is that \(\frac{1}{{\rm{x}}}\) is the derivative of \(\ln {\rm{x}}\). So, if we let \({\rm{u}} = \ln {\rm{x}}\), then \({\rm{du}} = \frac{1}{{\rm{x}}}{\rm{dx}}\).
The integral transforms from \(\smallint \ln {\rm{x}} \cdot \frac{1}{{\rm{x}}}{\rm{dx}}\) to \(\smallint {\rm{u}} \, {\rm{du}}\). This is a basic power rule integral:
\(\smallint {\rm{u}} \, {\rm{du}} = \frac{{{\rm{u}}^{1+1}}}{{1+1}} + {\rm{C}} = \frac{{{\rm{u}}^2}}{2} + {\rm{C}}\)
Substituting back \({\rm{u}} = \ln {\rm{x}}\) gives the result \(\frac{{{{(\ln {\rm{x}})}^2}}}{2} + {\rm{C}}\).
When evaluating definite integrals using substitution, you can either:
In this solution, we used the first method (evaluating the indefinite integral at original limits). For the integral \(\mathop \smallint_{{{\rm{e}}^{ - 1}}}^1 \frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}{\rm{dx}}\) with \({\rm{u}}=\ln {\rm{x}}\), the limits change from \({\rm{x}} = {\rm{e}}^{ - 1}\) to \({\rm{u}} = \ln({\rm{e}}^{ - 1}) = -1\) and from \({\rm{x}} = 1\) to \({\rm{u}} = \ln(1) = 0\). The integral becomes \(\mathop \smallint \nolimits_{ - 1}^0 {\rm{u}} \, {\rm{du}}\). For the integral \(\mathop \smallint_1^{{{\rm{e}}^2}} \frac{{\ln {\rm{x}}}}{{\rm{x}}}{\rm{dx}}\), the limits change from \({\rm{x}} = 1\) to \({\rm{u}} = \ln(1) = 0\) and from \({\rm{x}} = {\rm{e}}^2\) to \({\rm{u}} = \ln({\rm{e}}^2) = 2\). The integral becomes \(\mathop \smallint \nolimits_0^2 {\rm{u}} \, {\rm{du}}\). So the original integral is \( - \mathop \smallint \nolimits_{ - 1}^0 {\rm{u}} \, {\rm{du}} + \mathop \smallint \nolimits_0^2 {\rm{u}} \, {\rm{du}}\).
Summing these gives \(\frac{1}{2} + 2 = \frac{5}{2}\), confirming the result.
What is the value of \(8 I_1^2\)
What is the value of I2 ?
What is \(\mathop \smallint \limits_{ - 2}^2 {\rm{x\;dx}} - \mathop \smallint \limits_{ - 2}^2 \left[ {\rm{x}} \right]{\rm{dx}}\) equal to, where [⋅] is the greatest integer function?
What is \(\displaystyle\int_0^1 \ln \left(\frac{1}{x}−1\right)\) dx equal to ?
What is \(\rm \int^\pi _0 ln\left(tan\frac{x}{2}\right) dx\) equal to?
What is the area bounded by y = [x], where [⋅] is the greatest integer function, the x-axis and the lines x = -1.5 and x = -1.8?
The Legendre polynomials P n(x), n = 0, 1, 2, ..., satisfying the orthogonailty condition \(\int_{{\rm{ - 1}}}^{\rm{1}} {{{\rm{P}}_{\rm{n}}}\left( {\rm{x}} \right){{\rm{P}}_{\rm{m}}}} \left( {\rm{x}} \right){\rm{dx}}\,{\rm{ = }}\,\frac{{\rm{2}}}{{{\rm{2n + 1}}}}{{\rm{\delta }}_{{\rm{nm}}}}\) on the interval [-1, +1], may be defined by the Rodrigues formula P n(x) = \(\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{{\rm{2}}^{\rm{n}}}{\rm{n!}}}}\frac{{{{\rm{d}}^{\rm{n}}}}}{{{\rm{d}}{{\rm{x}}^{\rm{n}}}}}{\left( {{{\rm{x}}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - 1}}} \right)^{\rm{n}}}\) . The value of the definite integral \(\int_{{\rm{ - 1}}}^{\rm{1}} {\left( {{\rm{4 + 2x - 3}}{{\rm{x}}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ + 4}}{{\rm{x}}^{\rm{3}}}} \right){{\rm{P}}_{\rm{3}}}\left( {\rm{x}} \right){\rm{dx}}} \) is
A parametric curve is defined \(x = cos\left(\frac{\Pi t}{2}\right) , Y= sin\left(\frac{\Pi t}{2}\right)\) in the range of \(0\leq t\leq 1\) . It is rotated about X-axis by 360°.
‘What is the area of the surface generated?
if \(\displaystyle\int\dfrac{\sin x}{\sin (x-a)}dx=Ax+B\log |sin(x-a)|+ C\) where A, B and c are real constants then:
Which of the following is NOT a property of definite integral?