What is it that tutors do, or should do, in support of the online learner ? Some have sought to explore and clarify by the adoption of particular metaphors, such as moderator, mentor, or facilitator, to describe the tutor's role. These terms have their value in guiding our behaviour as online tutors, but their force is primarily to warn us to stand aside. The evidence is that too much or inappropriate, contribution to tutorial discussion by the tutor can inhibit contributions by the students. The rhetoric of facilitator and moderator speaks of a duty to liberate the students, and empower them to participate in their own learning. This has the ring of critical pedagogy about it, which would seek to remove the authority of the teacher, casting teacher and learner as equal participants in the educational endeavour. Such protestations of equality will ultimately show themselves to being disingenuous, however, when the imperative of assessment rears its ugly head. Worse, though is the fact that these formulations guide us about what we shouldn't do, but remain rather silent about what we should be doing. If the online tutor is going to move from centre stage and sacrifice some ideas of his or her sagacity, what sorts of roles might be taken up to contribute to the guidance of the online learner ? There are paradoxes here.
What will inhibit student's contribution to tutorial discussions?
Too much contribution of the tutor
The question asks us to identify what might inhibit a student's contribution to tutorial discussions. To determine the correct answer, we need to understand the role of a tutor in the context of online learning and the impact of their interaction on student participation.
From the provided comprehension, the tutor's role is explored in terms of being a moderator, mentor, or facilitator. These terms suggest that tutors should guide and support students rather than dominate the discussions. The key point in the comprehension is that excessive or inappropriate contributions by the tutor can inhibit student contributions.
Let's analyze each option:
Therefore, the correct answer is "Too much contribution of the tutor."
This conclusion aligns with the educational philosophy of empowering students to take charge of their learning, where the tutor should facilitate rather than direct the conversation.
In governance, communication is normally used as a means of:
Which of the following elements involving social positions are determinants of communication from the eastern perspectives?
A. Absence of leadership
B. Ego-centric individualism
C. Role
D. Status
E. Power
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Given below are two statements:
Statement I : Coercive communication is ethical, powerful and result-oriented.
Statement II : In international power politics, unethical propagandist communication promotes national prestige and security.
In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:
What was the initial response of western press to Ghandhiji's salt march ?
How did Time magazine describe Gandhi's salt march in its first report ?
The salt march was the first nationalist movement to attract/incur
What was the first effect of the salt March ?
According to the passage, the most significant outcome of the salt march was that
What has been done to describe the role of online tutors?
The passage is an analysis of:
The magazine in which Mahatma Gandhi mentioned what he wanted the Constitution to do is:
Which gas shields the surface of the earth from ultraviolet radiation from the sun?
Which event is marked as an Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity by UNESCO?
Who has been conferred with the rank of the Commander of the Order of the British Empire in 2018?
Who directead the film ‘Bhuvan Shome’?