The converse of "All cats are mammals" is
No mammals are cats
To find the converse of the statement "All cats are mammals," we need to understand what a converse statement is.
The converse of a statement is formed by swapping the subject and predicate of the original statement while retaining the logical form. The original statement "All cats are mammals" is of the form "All P are Q." The converse of this statement will be "All Q are P," which translates to "All mammals are cats."
Let us evaluate the given options to find the correct converse:
Thus, the correct answer for the converse of the statement "All cats are mammals" is "All mammals are cats." However, this option is missing in the given options, suggesting either an error in options or question comprehension. Nonetheless, a logical approach confirms this as the correct converse statement.
Which of the following statement is logically equivalent to "No birds are mammals"?
Which of the following statements is contrapositive to the following statement - "Some dogs are not aggressive animals"?
Which of the following refers to an attribute of every categorical proposition which is determined by whether the proposition affirms or denies class inclusion?
Which of the following is converse of 'Some S is P'?
In the statement “No dogs are reptiles”, which terms are distributed?
'All Judges are fairminded' is an example of __________ proposition.
The proposition 'Some trees are green' is equivalent to which of the following propositions?
(a) Many trees are green.
(b) Some green things are trees.
(c) Some green things are not non-trees.
(d) Trees are usually green.
Select the correct answer from the options given below:
The proposition 'All leaves are green' is equivalent to which of the following propositions?
(a) No leaves are green
(b) No leaves are non-green
(c) No leaves are in other colour than green
(d) No green is leaf
Select the correct answer from the options given below:
'All children are not greedy' is an example of which proposition?
The proposition ‘No historians are non-mathematician’ is equivalent to which of the following proposition?
Match List - I with List - II :
| List - I (Figures of Categorical Syllogism) | List - II (Structure) |
| A. First | I. M-P, S-M $\rightarrow$ S-P |
| B. Second | II. P-M, S-M $\rightarrow$ S-P |
| C. Third | III. M-P, M-S $\rightarrow$ S-P |
| D. Fourth | IV. P-M, M-S $\rightarrow$ S-P |
Choose the correct answer from the options given below :
Which of the following statement is logically equivalent to "No birds are mammals"?