Ralph Tyler's model of curriculum evaluation, often referred to as "Tyler's Rationale," provides a systematic framework for curriculum development and assessment. A fundamental aspect of this model is the careful identification and formulation of curriculum objectives. Tyler emphasized that these objectives should not be arbitrary but should stem from a thorough analysis of specific sources.
According to Tyler's influential work, curriculum objectives are primarily derived from three crucial areas. Analyzing these sources helps ensure that the curriculum is relevant, meaningful, and effective for learners and society.
The Student: This source focuses on understanding the learners themselves. Key considerations include:
By considering the student, Tyler aimed to create a curriculum that resonates with learners, meets their individual needs, and facilitates meaningful learning.
The Society: This source involves examining the context in which the curriculum operates. Tyler believed that education should contribute positively to society. This involves understanding:
Considering the societal context helps ensure that the curriculum prepares students to be responsible and contributing members of their community and the wider world.
The Subject Matter: This source pertains to the academic disciplines and content areas themselves. Tyler highlighted the importance of:
Focusing on subject matter ensures that the curriculum is academically sound, intellectually rigorous, and provides students with a deep understanding of the knowledge base.
By synthesizing insights from these three distinct sources—the student, the society, and the subject matter—educators can formulate clear, meaningful, and relevant curriculum objectives that guide the entire educational process, from planning and instruction to evaluation.
| LIST-I | LIST-II |
|---|---|
| A. Context | I. To determine the curriculum is accomplish the intended goals. |
| B. Input | II. To address curriculum implementation decision that control and manage the plan of curriculum. |
| C. Process | III. To provide information for determining how to utilize resources to meet curriculum goals. |
| D. Product | IV. To study the environment of curriculum implementation |
| LIST-I Curriculum Development Model | LIST-II Year |
|---|---|
| A. Tylers model | I. 1959 |
| B. States model | II. 1991 |
| C. Scriven model | III. 1949 |
| D. Krikpatrick model | IV. 1967 |