Statement 1: No boats are ships.
Statement 2: All ship are steamers.
Conclusion I: Some boats are steamers.
Conclusion II: No ships are boats.
Conclusion III: Some steamers are ships.
We are given two statements and three conclusions. We need to determine which conclusions logically follow from the statements.
Statements:Statement 1 says boats and ships are completely separate categories. Statement 2 places ships entirely within the steamer category. However, these statements do not provide any information about the relationship between boats and steamers. It is possible that no boats are steamers, or some are, or all are. Therefore, Conclusion I does not necessarily follow from the given statements.
Statement 1 states "No boats are ships". This is a universal negative statement. The statement "No ships are boats" is the direct converse and is logically equivalent. If no boats are ships, then it must be true that no ships are boats. Therefore, Conclusion II follows directly from Statement 1.
Statement 2 states "All ships are steamers". This means the set of all ships is a subset of the set of steamers. If there exists at least one ship (which is implied), then that ship must also be a steamer. Thus, it logically follows that some steamers are ships. Therefore, Conclusion III follows from Statement 2.
Based on the analysis:
Therefore, only conclusions II and III logically follow from the given statements.
Consider the given statement as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements:
Statement:
All rivers are holy. All gods are holy.
Conclusion:
1. All rivers are gods.
2. All gods are rivers.
In this question, two statements are given, followed by three conclusions labelled I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, and decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow(s) from the given statements.
Statements:
All mansions are palaces.
No castles are palaces.
Conclusions:
I: Some palaces are mansions.
II: Some castles are mansions.
II: No mansions are castles.Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All forests are hills.
Some hills are deserts.
Conclusions:
(I): All hills are forests.
(II): Some deserts are hills.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All bottles are ludo.
All ludo are dancer.
Conclusions:
(I): Some dancers are ludo.
(II): All bottles are dancers.