Statement: Some ponds are lakes. Some lakes are rivers. Some rivers are seas
Conclusions:
1. Some seas are lakes
2. No sea is a lake
We are given three statements:
We need to determine which of the following conclusions logically follows:
Let P represent the set of Ponds, L the set of Lakes, R the set of Rivers, and S the set of Seas.
The given statements can be represented as:
We need to find the logical relationship between Lakes (L) and Seas (S) based on these premises.
The premises establish that the set of Lakes (L) has a non-empty intersection with the set of Rivers (R), and the set of Rivers (R) also has a non-empty intersection with the set of Seas (S).
The crucial point is that the overlap between Lakes and Rivers ($L ∩ R$) might involve different members of the River set than the overlap between Rivers and Seas ($R ∩ S$).
Since the given statements allow for both possibilities (overlap or no overlap between Lakes and Seas), neither Conclusion 1 nor Conclusion 2 is guaranteed to be true in all cases.
However, the relationship between Lakes and Seas must be one of the two possibilities: either they overlap (Conclusion 1 is true) or they do not overlap (Conclusion 2 is true). The premises do not allow for any other relationship (like 'All seas are lakes' or 'All lakes are seas'). Because the premises allow for scenarios validating Conclusion 1, and also for scenarios validating Conclusion 2, the correct choice is that either one or the other follows.
Consider the given statement as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements:
Statement:
All rivers are holy. All gods are holy.
Conclusion:
1. All rivers are gods.
2. All gods are rivers.
In this question, two statements are given, followed by three conclusions labelled I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, and decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow(s) from the given statements.
Statements:
All mansions are palaces.
No castles are palaces.
Conclusions:
I: Some palaces are mansions.
II: Some castles are mansions.
II: No mansions are castles.Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All forests are hills.
Some hills are deserts.
Conclusions:
(I): All hills are forests.
(II): Some deserts are hills.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All bottles are ludo.
All ludo are dancer.
Conclusions:
(I): Some dancers are ludo.
(II): All bottles are dancers.