Statement 1 : All minutes are seconds.
Statement 2 : No seconds are hours.
Conclusion I : No hours are seconds.
Conclusion II : Some minutes are hours.
This question requires analyzing logical syllogisms based on given statements and determining which conclusions are valid.
Statement 2 explicitly states that there is no overlap between 'seconds' and 'hours' (\(No seconds are hours\)). This relationship is symmetrical. Therefore, it is equally true that there is no overlap between 'hours' and 'seconds' (\(No hours are seconds\)).
Result: Conclusion I logically follows from Statement 2.
Statement 1 places all 'minutes' inside the 'seconds' category. Statement 2 states that 'seconds' and 'hours' are mutually exclusive categories.
Since all 'minutes' belong to the 'seconds' category, and 'seconds' have no members in common with 'hours', it logically follows that 'minutes' also cannot have any members in common with 'hours'. Therefore, the conclusion \(Some minutes are hours\) must be false.
Result: Conclusion II does not follow from the statements.
Only Conclusion I is logically derived from the given statements. Conclusion II contradicts the information provided.
Therefore, the correct option is the one stating that only Conclusion I follows.
Consider the given statement as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements:
Statement:
All rivers are holy. All gods are holy.
Conclusion:
1. All rivers are gods.
2. All gods are rivers.
In this question, two statements are given, followed by three conclusions labelled I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, and decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow(s) from the given statements.
Statements:
All mansions are palaces.
No castles are palaces.
Conclusions:
I: Some palaces are mansions.
II: Some castles are mansions.
II: No mansions are castles.Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All forests are hills.
Some hills are deserts.
Conclusions:
(I): All hills are forests.
(II): Some deserts are hills.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All bottles are ludo.
All ludo are dancer.
Conclusions:
(I): Some dancers are ludo.
(II): All bottles are dancers.