"The parties to a contract must either perform or offer to perform their respective promises unless the performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of the Contract Act or of any other law.” Explain the statement in reference to relevant provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
The statement encapsulates a core principle of contract law: parties are bound to fulfill their promises. This duty of performance is primarily codified in Sections 37 to 39 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Obligation to Perform (Section 37):
Parties must “perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises,” unless performance is dispensed with or excused under the Act or any law. Actual performance is emphasized. If a tendered performance is rejected without justification, the tendering party is discharged from further liability.
Offer of Performance (Tender) (Section 38):
A tender is a valid attempt to perform the promise. If the promisee refuses acceptance, the promisor is excused from further performance and may sue for non-acceptance. A tender must be unconditional, made at the proper time and place, allow inspection (in case of goods), and provide the promisee a reasonable opportunity to ascertain compliance.
Refusal to Perform (Section 39):
If a party wholly refuses or incapacitates themselves from performing, the promisee may terminate the contract unless they have acquiesced. This includes anticipatory breach or repudiation.
Circumstances Excusing Performance:
Conclusion:
The Act provides a structured framework mandating performance while offering equitable exceptions. Tender of performance ensures willing parties are protected, and doctrines like frustration or waiver maintain fairness. This balance safeguards contractual sanctity while accommodating practical realities, ensuring contracts remain enforceable yet flexible in unforeseen circumstances.
Answered By:
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Under what circumstances can the appropriate government commute the sentence of death and life imprisonment for anyother punishment? Discuss.
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
"Doctrine of foreseeability', not the 'proximity', is a correct test of 'remoteness'." Explain with the help of case-laws.
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Explain the principle of liability of master for the torts committed by his servant. Write case-laws.
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Describe the salient features of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955.
"Homicide means killing of a human being by a human being." Explain the statement and distinguish between culpable homicide amounting to murder and not amounting to murder.
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
"The definition of 'public servant' as per the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is only illustrative and not exhaustive." Comment.
"Right to private defence is a valuable right but it must be exercised reasonably." Explain with examples.
Discuss the law of defamation. Is this correct to say that law of defamation gives too much protection to 'reputation' and imposes too a great restriction on the freedom of speech? Comment.
"The law of torts is said to be a development of the maxim ubi jus ibi remedium." Illustrate your answer with the help of decided case-laws.
"Nuisance is no branch of negligence." Explain. Describe who can sue and who is liable for nuisance.
Write a note in 150 words
Mendelian and non-Mendelian traits.
Write a note in 150 words
Theoretical significance of Purum kinship-system.
Write a note in 150 words
Smell as a signal among non-human primates.
Write a note in 150 words
Osteodontokeratik culture and its makers.
Discuss the Miocene hominoid remains and their significance in evolution.