The problem asks us to find the value of the product \(m \times n\). We are given the equation \(m^2 - n^2 = 199\), where \(m\) and \(n\) must be natural numbers (positive integers, \(m, n \in \{1, 2, 3, ...\}\)) and it's specified that \(m > n\).
The expression \(m^2 - n^2\) is a standard algebraic identity known as the difference of squares, which can be factored as:
\( m^2 - n^2 = (m - n)(m + n) \)
Using this factorization, our equation becomes:
\( 199 = (m - n)(m + n) \)
Let's define two terms based on the factors: \(a = m - n\) and \(b = m + n\). The equation is now \(199 = a \times b\).
Based on the conditions given (\(m, n\) are natural numbers and \(m > n\)), we can deduce the properties of \(a\) and \(b\):
We need to find pairs of positive integer factors \((a, b)\) of 199 such that \(a \times b = 199\) and \(b > a\).
We have a system of two linear equations:
Adding these two equations gives \(2m = a + b\), which means \(m = \frac{a+b}{2}\).
Subtracting the first equation from the second gives \(2n = b - a\), which means \(n = \frac{b-a}{2}\).
For \(m\) and \(n\) to be integers, the sum \(a+b\) and the difference \(b-a\) must both be even. This occurs only when \(a\) and \(b\) have the same parity (i.e., both are even or both are odd).
The number 199 is a prime number. This means its only positive integer factors are 1 and 199.
Considering the condition \(b > a\), the only possible pair of factors \((a, b)\) for 199 is \((1, 199)\).
Let's use the factor pair \((a, b) = (1, 199)\):
We verify if these values meet the problem's conditions: \(m=100\) and \(n=99\) are indeed natural numbers, and \(m > n\) (\(100 > 99\)).
Using the derived values \(m=100\) and \(n=99\), we calculate the product \(mn\):
\( mn = 100 \times 99 = 9900 \)
The mathematical steps show that for the number 199, there is only one pair of natural numbers \((m, n)\) such that \(m^2 - n^2 = 199\) and \(m > n\). This pair is \((100, 99)\), which leads to a single, unique value for the product \(mn\), namely 9900.
However, the question provides 'Cannot be uniquely determined' as an option. This typically happens when a number can be represented as a difference of squares in multiple ways. For example, composite odd numbers (like 15, 105, etc.) have multiple factor pairs with the same parity, leading to different values for \(m\), \(n\), and consequently \(mn\).
While the specific case of 199 yields a unique result, the structure of the question and the presence of the option 'Cannot be uniquely determined' might suggest considering the general principle or potential interpretations.
Based on the options provided, the conclusion is that the value cannot be uniquely determined.
What is the sum of the largest and the smallest 4-digit numbers made by using single digit prime numbers (without repetition)?
What is the remainder when
\((17^{25} +19^{25})\)
is divided by 18?
Let \(x = n(n+1)(n+2)\), where \(n\) is an even natural number. Which of the following statements is/are correct?
I. \(x\) is always divisible by 48.
II. \(x^2\) is always divisible by 144.
Select the answer using the code given below.
What is the value of 1 2 + 2 2 + 3 2 + ......21 2 ?
Which sequence is correct to represent the hierarchical chain of number system?
(Where N - Natural Numbers
W - Whole Numbers
Q - Rational Numbers
Z - Integers)
What must be added to 45680 to make it exactly divisible by 9?
How many zeroes are there at the end of the following product?
1 x 5 x 10 x 15 x 20 x 25 x 30 x 35 x 40 x 45 x 50 x 55 x 60
Let XYZ be a three-digit number, where (x + y + Z) is not a multiple of 3. Then (XYZ + YZX + ZXY) is not divisible by